SOCIAL FUND AND THE HIERARCHY OF MUHAMMADIYAH ORPHANAGES FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCY
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the Muhammadiyah social fund and the hierarchy of financial independence of seven its orphanages in the Province of Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. This study utilizes primary data which is obtained from interview, questionnaire, document studies, and observations; and analyzed using Analytical Hierarchy Process and SWOT approaches. It finds that the orphanages have the same type of fund resources which collected from the donors, namely, permanent donor (the top priority), incidental, social service and government, permanent business, and seasonal business. Meanwhile, the orphanage funds were allocated to the foster children’s skill improvement, foster children’s tuition fee, orphanages development fund, orphanages activities, kitchen support/daily needs, orphanage’s saving/investment and foster children’s saving/investment. Four of out seven orphanage funds prior allocation went to the foster children’s skill improvement, while the rest, to the orphanage development, foster children’s saving/investment, and orphanage’s saving/investment. It indicates the dependency of the orphanages financial sources toward the donors, or lacks their own investment, despite some are better-off by starting their own-business. These finding could be benefited for the orphanages in managing the social funds for investment and mapping the potential as well as the development of the orphanage financial independence in their future strategies
Article Details
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abror, R. H. (2012). Rethinking Muhammadiyah: Masjid, Teologi Dakwah dan Tauhid Sosial (Persepktif Filsafat Dakwah). Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 6(1), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.15575/idajhs.v6i1.327
Cresswell, J. W. (2007). Quallitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches. USA: SAGE Publication.
Dona, R. (2017). Pengenalan Multifactor Evaluaton Process (MFEP) dan Analytic Hierarchy Process. 3.
Ettekal, A., & Mahoney, J. L. (2017). The SAGE Encyclopedia of out-of School Learning: Ecological System Theory. Thousand Oak: SAGE.
Harker, P. T. (1987). Alternative Modes of Questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Math Modelling, 9(3-5), 353-360.
Huttman, E., & Redmond, S. (1992) Women and Homelessness: Evidence of Need to Look Beyond Shelters to Long Term Social Service Assistance and Permanent Housing. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 19(4), 7. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol19/iss4/7
Lexy, J. M. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ommani, A. R. (2011). Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis for Farming System Businesses Management: Case of Wheat Farmers of Shadervan District, Shoushtar Township, Iran. African Journal of Business Management, 5(22), 9448-9454. Retrieved from: http://www.academicjournals.org/AJBM
Qodir, Z. (2008). Muhammadiyah dan Advokasi Kemiskinan. Lariba Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 141. https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEI/article/view/166/131
Rizki, M. (2018). Muhammadiyah Canangkan Pemberdayaan Panti Asuhan. Retrieved from: http://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2102/08/07/muhammadiyahCanangkan-Pemberdayaan-Panti-asuhan (November 27, 2012)
Saaty, T. L. (2001). Decision Making with the AHP: Why is the Principal Eigenvector Necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00227-8
Silvia, A., & Permana, B. (2018). Strategi Peningkatan Pendanaan Mandiri Panti Asuhan melalui Pelatihan Sablon. Syukur (Jurnal Inovasi Sosial dan Pengabdian Masyarakat), 1(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.22236/syukur_vol1/is1pp12-21
Suara Muhammadiyah. Sertifikasi Aset dan Wakaf Jadi Prioritas Majelis Wakaf dan Kehartabendaan. Suara Muhammadiyah: 25. Retrieved from: http://www.suaramuhammadiyah.id/2016/09/03/sertifikasi-aset-dan-wakaf-jadi-prioritas-majelis-wakaf-dan-kehartabendaan/ (2016, September 16)
Suparno, (2017). Community Participation and The Creation of Social Justice. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 8(8), 1093–1098. Retrieved from: http://http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=8&IType=8
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & Devault, M. (2016). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource, 4th Edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Teehankee, B. (2009). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Capturing Quantitative and Qualitative Criteria for Balanced Decision-Making. National Conference of the OR Society of the Philliphines (ORSP). Philliphines. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256009323_The_Analytic_Hierarchy_Process_Capturing_Quantitative_and_Qualitative_Criteria_for_Balanced_Decision-Making
Wahyuningtias, C. N., Sudarmiatin, & Indrawati, A. (2016). SWOT Analysis for Determining Marketing Strategy at the Primagama Courses. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 18(5), 38-46. Retrieved from: http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol18-issue5/Version-3/G1805033846.pdf
Yüksel, I. (2012). Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for PESTEL Analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n24p52