An Integrated Pest Management System Development: An Economic Valuation Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.21.2.5042Keywords:
Integrated Pest Management System, Willingness to Pay, Stakeholders, Agricultural, Tajuk VillageAbstract
This study aims to determine the socio-economic characteristics of Tajuk Village farmers and determine the conditions as well as management of agriculture on broccoli and cabbage vegetables, also designing alternative proposals for management of conventional farming systems into agriculture using an Integrated Pest Management system in Tajuk Village, Semarang District. By using Mix Method, a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches, the research was to determine the amount of farmers’ willingness to pay using the Contingent Valuation Method and see the benefits that could be obtained with a different farming system. The results showed that by using the Willingness to Pay (WTP) Analysis, there were 94.55% of farmers in Tajuk Village who were willing to pay the value of the offer given. Thus, it obtained an average value of WTP of IDR 41,000 with a total value of WTP on changes in the Integrated Pest Management system of IDR 3,034,000 per harvest. Besides, the total annual WTP value was IDR 6,068,000. This WTP value can be used as the cost of planning the development of an Integrated Pest Management system in Tajuk Village by collaborating with the development plan by the Stakeholders in the planned program involvement. The stakeholders classified as key players were the Agriculture and Plantation Office, Horticultural Food Crops Research Institute (BPTPH), Pest Disease Control (PHP), Plant Disturbing Organism Observers (POPT), and Head of Farmer Groups. The actors were the Village Authority, Sub-district Authority, and business people. While academics act as context setters.References
Adhitya, F. W., Hartono, D., & Awirya, A. A. (2013). Determinan produktivitas lahan pertanian subsektor tanaman pangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 14(1), 110-125. https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v14i1.165
Adnyana, M. O., & Wardana, P. (2016). Willingness to accept dan willingness to pay petani dan konsumen terhadap padi hibrida di sentra produksi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan, 35(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.21082/jpptp.v35n1.2016.p53-62
Agustian, A., & Benny, D. A. N. (2015). Penerapan teknologi pengendalian hama terpadu pada komoditas perkebunan rakyat. Perspektif, 8(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.21082/p.v8n1.2009
Andayani, S. A. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Produksi Cabai Merah. Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 1(3), 261–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/ma.v1i3.46
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2018). Kabupaten Semarang Dalam Angka 2018. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2018/07/03/5a963c1ea9b0fed6497d0845/statistik-indonesia-2018.html
Bendahan, S. (2002). Multi-issue actor strategic analysis models. Thesis. HEC, University of Lausanne.
Dewi, N. L. P. R., Utama, M. S., & Yuliarmi, N. N. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi produktivitas usahatani dan keberhasilan program SIMANTRI di Kabupaten Klungkung. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 6(2), 701–728. Retrieved from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/article/view/24578
Fauzi, A. (2004). Ekonomi Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hadad, M. S. A. (2012). Valuasi ekonomi ekosistem lamun pulau Widoba kabupaten Halmahera Selatan Provinsi Maluku Utara. Master Theses. Insitute Pertanian Bogor. Retrieved from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/jspui/bitstream/123456789/55810/1/2012msa.pdf
Kılıç, O., Boz, İ., & Eryılmaz, G. A. (2020). Comparison of conventional and good agricultural practices farms: A socio-economic and technical perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120666
Loha, K. M., Lamoree, M., Weiss, J. M., & de Boer, J. (2018). Import, disposal, and health impacts of pesticides in the East Africa Rift(EAR) zone: A review on management and policy analysis. Crop Protection, 112, 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.06.014
Mariyono, J., & Irham. (2010). Usaha menurunkan penggunaan pestisida kimia dengan program pengendalian hama terpadu. Manusia dan Lingkungan, 8(l), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.22146/jml.18570
Masithoh, S. W. N. B. P. (2013). Analisis efisiensi penggunaan faktor-faktor produksi usaha tani kubis ( brassica oleracea ) di Kertasari , Bandung , Jawa Barat. Jurnal Pertanian, 4(2), 100–108. https://ojs.unida.ac.id/jp/article/view/61
Philippe, V., Neveen, A., Marwa, A., & Basel, A. Y. A. (2021). Occurrence of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables for the Eastern Mediterranean Region and potential impact on public health. Food Control, 119, 107457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107457
Pomeroy, R. S., & Rivera-Guieb, R. (2005). Fishery co-management: a practical handbook. Cookies on CAB eBooks.
Pomeroy, R. S., Katon, B. M., & Harkes, I. (2001). Conditions affecting the success of fisheries co-management: lessons from asia. Marine Policy. 25(3), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-597x(01)00010-0
Priyambodo, A. W. (2017). Analisis willingness to accept petani dan willingness to pay konsumen sayuran organik di Batu Malang Jawa Timur. 1–82. Master Theses. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Retrieved from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/87395
Rani, D. I. S. (2019). Model tripitate (akademisi-pemerintah-masyarakat) dalam pengelolaan kepulauan karimunjawa untuk pembangunan berkelanjutan. Theses. Universitas Diponegoro.
Sari, N., Fatchiya, A., & Tjitropranoto, P. (2016). Tingkat Penerapan Pengendalian Hama Terpadu (PHT) Sayuran di Kenagarian Koto Tinggi, Kabupaten Agam, Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Penyuluhan, 12(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.25015/penyuluhan.v12i1.11316
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis (D. A. Halim (ed.); 6th ed.). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Srivastav, A. L. (2020). Chemical fertilizers and pesticides: role in groundwater contamination. Agrochemicals Detection, Treatment and Remediation. LTD. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-103017-2.00006-4
Tresnadi, H. (2000). Valuasi komoditas lingkungan berdasarkan contingent valuation method. Jurnal Teknologi, 1(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.29122/JTL.V1I1.162
Whitehead, J. C., & Haab, T. C. (2013). Contingent Valuation Method. Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics, 3, 334-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375067-9.00004-8
Yuantari, M. G. C., Widianarko, B., & Rya, S. H. (2015). Analisis Risiko Pajanan Pestisida Terhadap Kesehatan Petani. Kemas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 2(10), 239-245. https://doi.org/10.15294/kemas.v10i2.3387
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
