Strengthening ADR System in Indonesia: Learning from ADR Practices in Hungary

Beny Saputra

Abstract


Integrating Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) into legal systems is essential for improving access to justice, decreasing litigation expenses, and promoting enforced outcomes. This article examines the ADR practices in Hungary, a country that has successfully integrated ADR into its legal system, to gain significant insights for Indonesia, as both countries share the same sociocultural practices for communal dispute resolution. This normative legal research examines Hungary's extensive legal framework, the roles of institutional support structures, and the enforcement of ADR awards. The study employs comparative analysis that systematically evaluates pertinent legal documents, institutional reports, and scholarly literature from Hungary and Indonesia. The study found fundamental factors that contribute to the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in Hungary including the existence of a clearly established legislative framework, sufficient institutional infrastructure, and effective regulation to enforce ADR decisions. Indonesia can adopt these techniques to improve its Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) system, resulting in more streamlined, cost-efficient, and fair processes for resolving disputes and to establish a more unified and efficient ADR system.


Keywords


Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR); Hungary; Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

References


ACERIS LAW LLC, ‘Arbitration in Hungary’, 2022

‘Act LX of 2017 on Arbitration’ [accessed 26 March 2024]

Albar, Andi Ardillah, ‘Dinamika Mekanisme Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Konteks Hukum Bisnis Internasional’, 2019

Anggita, Citra, and Tsuyoshi Hatori, ‘Customary Practices of Musyawarah Mufakat: An Indonesian Style of Consensus Building’, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 589.1 (2020), p. 012027, doi:10.1088/1755-1315/589/1/012027

Ar Raidah, Salsabila Fakhriyyah, ‘Comparative Study of Alternative Settlements in Indonesia and Timor Leste’, Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 5.2 (2021), doi:10.15294/jpcl.v5i2.30339

Ardiansyah, Ardiansyah, ‘Comparative Study of the Implementation of Alternative Disputes Resolution (ADR) in Tax and Customs Disputes in Indonesia’, Journal Evidence of Law, 1.1 (2022), pp. 55–69, doi:https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v1i1.15

Balzer, Benjamin, and Johannes Schneider, ‘Managing a Conflict: Optimal Alternative Dispute Resolution’, The RAND Journal of Economics, 52.2 (2021), pp. 415–45, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12374

Begum, Mehnaz, Shabir Ahmed Khan, and Muhammad Zubair Khan, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Contemporary World’, Global International Relations Review, V (2022), pp. 11–16, doi:https://doi.org/10.31703/girr.2022(v-iii).02

‘Black’s Law Dictionary - Free Online Legal Dictionary’, 2022

‘EU Justice Scoreboard’, 2023

Faludi, Zoltan, ‘New Arbitration Regime in Hungary’, 2020

Fejős, Andrea, and Ágnes Herczeg, ‘Hungary-Report in State of Collective Redress in the EU in the Context of the Implementation of the Commission Recommendation’, 2017

Folberg, Jay, Dwight Golann, Thomas J Stipanowich, Jennifer Reynolds, and Amy J Schmitz, Resolving Disputes (Aspen Publishing, 2021)

Gill, Chris, Jane Williams, Carol Brennan, and Carolyn Hirst, ‘Models of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): A Report for the Legal Ombudsman’, 2014

Herliana, Herliana, Umar Mubdi, Arief Sempurno, and Erma Nuzulia Syifa, ‘Optimizing Clinical Legal Education for Enhancing Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Collaborative Approach between Law Schools and the Indonesian Arbitration Institution (BANI)’, The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 5.2 (2023), doi:10.15294/ijicle.v5i2.67001

‘Home - Hungarian Arbitartion Association’ [accessed 20 March 2024]

Hwang, Michael, ‘The New York Convention and the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Existing Models for Legal Convergence in Asia?’, in Convergence and Divergence of Private Law in Asia, ed. by Gary Low (Cambridge University Press, 2022), pp. 62–80, doi:DOI: 10.1017/9781108566391.004

Illankoon, I M C S, Vivian W Y Tam, Khoa N Le, and K A T O Ranadewa, ‘Causes of Disputes, Factors Affecting Dispute Resolution and Effective Alternative Dispute Resolution for Sri Lankan Construction Industry’, International Journal of Construction Management, 22.2 (2019), pp. 218–28, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1616415

Irvine, Charlie, Bryan Clark, and Rachel Katrina Robertson, ‘Alternative Mechanisms for Resolving Disputes: A Literature Review’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2011, doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1816743

Körtvélyesi, Zsolt, ‘Nation, Nationality, and National Identity: Uses, Misuses, and the Hungarian Case of External Ethnic Citizenship’, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 33.3 (2020), pp. 771–98, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09731-8

Kovac, Cvetan, and Ivana Kristo, ‘Mediation - Alternative Dispute Resolution’, Safety Engineering, 9.1 (2019), doi:https://doi.org/10.7562/se2019.9.01.04

Lestari, Rika, ‘Perbandingan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa secara Mediasi di Pengadilan dan di Luar Pengadilan di Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4.2 (2013), p. 217, doi:https://doi.org/10.30652/jih.v3i2.1819

Llc, Aceris Law, ‘Arbitration in Hungary’, 2023

‘Mediation as a Remedy in Trust and Probate Disputes: A Review of the Comparative Approach for International Lawyers’, Journal of Mediation & Applied Conflict Analysis, 6.1 (2019), pp. 728–42, doi:https://doi.org/10.33232/jmaca.6.1.10944

Purcell, J, ‘Individual Disputes at the Workplace: Alternative Disputes Resolution’, 2010, doi:https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:155736213

Raman, Parth, Mehak, Ayush Tandon, and Piyush Pandey, ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) with Human Rights through European Legislation’, Journal of Legal Studies & Research, 08.05 (2022), pp. 137–45, doi:https://doi.org/10.55662/jlsr.2022.8503

Reyes-Monjaras, María Elena, Lorena Zaleta-Morales, Rosa Iliana Ortega-Cortés, and Valentín Gómez-Barrera, ‘Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution in the 21st Century’, ECORFAN Journal Mexico, 2020, pp. 24–35, doi:https://doi.org/10.35429/ejm.2020.25.11.24.35

Saputra, Beny, ‘Modelling Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) for Indonesia in Order to Combat Financial Crime’, NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance, 1.2 (2021), p. 81, doi:http://doi.org/10.29240/negrei.v1i2.3822

Siems, Mathias M, ‘Comparative Law’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014, doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2512938

Subrata, Rusli, ‘Mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Conflict and Dispute Resolution in Indonesia’, Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023), 24, 2023, doi:https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.7198

Yuniarti, S, ‘Online Dispute Resolution as Future Dispute Settlement in Indonesia’, in Proceedings of the Proceedings of The 1st Workshop Multimedia Education, Learning, Assessment and Its Implementation in Game and Gamification, Medan Indonesia, 26th January 2019, WOMELA-GG (EAI, 2019), doi:10.4108/eai.26-1-2019.2283268




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v6i2.21984

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Beny Saputra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.