Kewenangan KPK dalam Melakukan Penggabungan Perkara TPPU dengan Predicate Crime Korupsi

Eki Tolanda, Estes Metelmety, Ragil Sanjaya Marjuki, Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin

Abstract


Crime is an act that can cause harm to other people and even to the state and is called a delict or criminal act which is regulated in the criminal code. The crime of money laundering (TPPU) is one of the criminal acts regulated in Law Number 8 of 2010. Several TPPU cases are crimes originating from corruption, so disclosure of these TPPU cases is carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). ). During the investigation and investigation process, the Corruption Eradication Committee found that the money resulting from corruption had been changed in form through the money laundering process, but in the process of enforcing the court's decision, it only decided on criminal acts of corruption even though money laundering had been carried out. The aim of the research is to determine the authority of the Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) in combining TPPU cases with the predicate crime of corruption. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the research can be concluded based on articles 74 and 75 of the TPPU Law which state that investigators of predicate crimes can carry out TPPU investigations if they find sufficient initial evidence of TPPU occurring when conducting predicate crime investigations in accordance with their authority so that the Corruption Eradication Commission is one of the investigators referred to based on the explanation in article 74 In terms of prosecution, it can be carried out by a public prosecutor from the Prosecutor's Office and a public prosecutor from the Corruption Eradication Commission if the original crime was corruption

Keywords


KPK authority; combining cases; TPPU

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

M. Ridwan dan Ediwarman, Azas-Azas Kriminologi, Medan, USU Press, 1994.

Jurnal

Afnan Wildana Basith. (2021) Penggabungan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Kasus Hukum Di Indonesia. Sintaksis : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1(3).

Aprianto J. Muhaling. (2019). Kelalaian Yang Mengakibatkan Matinya Orang Menurut Perundang – Undangan Yang Berlaku Lex Crimen, 8(3).

Beni Kurnia Illahi dan Muhammad Ikhsan Alia. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara Melalui Kerja Sama BPK dan KPK. Pusat Studi Konstitusi (PUSaKO) Universitas Andalas. Integritas, 3(2).

Budi Saiful Haris. (2016) Penguatan Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Integritas, Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK), 29(1).

M. Ilham Wira Pratama. (2022). Analisis Terhadap Sanksi Pidana Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Perspektif Economic Analysis of Law). Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC).

Yan Patmos. (2017). Penegakan Pasal Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Rangka Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi. Journal Of Law And Policy Transformation, 2(2).

Yonathan Sebastian Laowo. (2022). Kajian Hukum Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Loundring). Jurnal Panah Keadilan, 1(1).

Regulasi

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v5i1.21441

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Pusat Kajian Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
E5 Building, 2nd floor, UMY, Jl.Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Yogyakarta 55183
Telp. +62 274 387656 Ext 472, 082230546322 (WA), Fax: 0274 384646
E-Mail: ijclc@umy.ac.id