Dispute Resolution for Islamic Banks in Indonesia

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Mar 18, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/ijief.v4i0.10084
Keywords:
Islamic Banks, Indonesia, Litigation, Alternative Dispute Resolutions

Main Article Content

Atharyanshah Puneri
International Islamic University Malaysia

Abstract

The rapid growth of Islamic banking and finance industry demanded an improvement in term of standards, frameworks, policy, technologies, resources, and guidelines in order to go beyond without compromising the core values of Islam itself. In the context of legal framework of Islamic banking and finance, it is most likely this industry needs to be highly regulated in order to avoid manipulation and abuse by the irresponsible parties. One of the crucial issue in the area of Islamic Banks in Indonesia is regarding about the dispute resolution mechanism for Islamic Banks. Based on Indonesian positive law, there are two alternative dispute resolution mechanisms that can be exercised by parties to settle disputes in cases involving Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs) namely through litigation or non-litigation. Litigation comes under the jurisdiction of the Religious Court. Researcher in this study are look deeper into the dispute resolution mechanism for Islamic Banks in Indonesia, as well as going through some decided cases. And based on the study done, it was found that alternative dispute resolution mechanism is more effective to resolve Islamic Banks dispute rather than litigation. In the future, researchers may conduct more research to examine deeper about the dispute resolution mechanism for the whole Islamic Economics and Finance in Indonesia. Moreover, researchers need to look at the regulators' and legislators’ perception towards dispute resolution and legal environment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Puneri, A. (2021). Dispute Resolution for Islamic Banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance (IJIEF), 4(SI), 153–180. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijief.v4i0.10084
Issue
Vol. 4 (2021): IJIEF Vol 4 (SI), Special Issue: Islamic Banking
Section
Articles

License 

This journal is based on the work available at http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ijief/ under a license from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms, which include the following:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Antonio, M. S. (2001). Bank Syariah: Dari Teori ke Praktik. Jakarta: GemaInsani Press.

Arto, A. M. (2015). Pembaharuan Hukum Islam Melalui Putusan Hakim. Yogyakarta, D.I. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar.

Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia. (2016, June 31). Tentang Arbitrase. Retrieved from Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia: http://www.baniarbitraseindonesia. org/id_arbitrase.php?id=1

Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia. (2018, January 1). Bani Arbitration. Retrieved from Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia: https://www.baniarbitration.org/ assets/pdf/BANI%20Arbitration%20Rules%20and%20Procedures%202018-English.pdf

Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. (2015). Masterplan Arsitektur Keuangan Syariah Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.

Basir, C. (2009). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah di Pengadilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syariah. Jakarta: Kencana.

Fariana, A. (2015, December). Peran Strategis Pengadilan Agama Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah. Al-Ihkam, 10 (2), 228-251.

Fuady, M. (2005). Pengantar Hukum Bisnis: Menata Bisnis Modern di Era Global. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harahap, E. H., Runtung, Azwar, T. K., & Barus, U. M. (2014). Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah. USU Law Journal, 59-73.

Harun, B. (2010). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kredit Bermasalah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Pustaka Yustisia.

Hasan, H. (2010). Kompetensi Peradilan Agama Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah. Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia: Gramata Publishing.

Ichsan, N. (2015). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Ahkam, 231-240.

Ka'bah, R. (2013). Hukum ekonomi Syari'ah di Indonesia. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Konradus, D. (2016). Membedah Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Bangka Adinatha Mulia.

Korah, R. S. (2013). Mediasi Merupakan Salah Satu Alternatif Penyelesaian Masalah Dalam Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional. Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 33-42.

Latief, M. N. (2015, May). Reaktualisasi Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama dalam Sengketa Perbankan Syariah. Majalah Peradilan Agama.

Lestari, R. (2013). Perbandingan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Mediasi di Pengadilan dan di Luar Pengadilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 217-237.

Makarim, A. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Lewat Mediasi di Lembaga Litigasi dan Non Litigasi. Jakarta Selatan, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.

Manan, A. (2005). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: Kencana.

Manan, A. (2012). Hukum Ekonomi Syariah: Dalam Perspektif Kewenangan Peradilan Agama (Vol. 1). Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Masykur, A. (2017). Eksekusi Putusan Perkara Akad Murabahah. Jakarta: Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Mujahidin, A. (2014) Pembaruan Hukum Acara Pengadilan Agama. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Nordiansyah, E. (2019, December 09). Media Indonesia. Retrieved from medcom.id: https://www.medcom.id/ekonomi/mikro/VNxZx5gk-pangsa-pasar-bank-syariah-tembus-6

Prakoso, A. L. (2017). Tinjauan Terhadap Arbitrase Syariah Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Bidang Perbankan Syariah. Jurisprudence, 59-67.

Rahmadi, T. (2010). Mediasi: Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Spencer, D., & Brogan, M. (2006). Mediation Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Suadi, A. (2017). Peyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah: Teori dan Praktek. Depok: Penerbit Kencana.

Suadi, A. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah: Penemuan & Kaidah Hukum. Jakarta, Indonesia: PrenadaMedia Group.

Suadi, A. (2019, March 19). Personal Interview.

Sufiarina. (2013). Urgensi Pengadilan Agama Sebagai Penyelesai Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 200-225.

Supriyatni, R. (2010, November). Penerapan Fiqih Muamalat Sebagai Dasar Kewenangan. Syiar Hukum, 12(3), 189-206.

Umar, M. H., & Kardono, A. S. (1995). Hukum dan Lembaga Arbitrase di Indonesia. Jakarta: ELIPS Project.

Widjaja, G. & Yani, A. (2003). Hukum Arbitrase. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.