Comprehensive Model of Bankruptcy and Forensic Accounting

Eka Wirajuang Daurrohmah, Ali Riza, Pesi Suryani, Dekar Urumsah

Abstract


Going concern is an assumption of company establishment but some companies go bankrupt. Fraud can be a cause of bankruptcy, used to hide bankruptcy, and can occur due to bankruptcy. Potential fraud can occur in every main activity of a curator in resolving bankruptcy cases so the curator requires forensic accounting. The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of forensic accounting in bankruptcy cases resolved by a curator and exploring the model of the relationship between bankruptcy and forensic accounting. This study used a qualitative approach with semi-structured interviews. The respondents’ criteria were curators who had practiced for at least three years and had experiences in resolving bankruptcy assets. The data analysis was a content analysis, namely a relational analysis, with software Nvivo 11. The results of this study showed that, in carrying out their duties, there are obstacles that are commonly encountered by currators. Forensic accounting is important and helpful for curators’ work, especially related to fraud or verification of the accuracy of bankruptcy asset transactions and the process of valuing bankruptcy assets. However, not all curators understand forensic accounting

Keywords


Bankruptcy; Curator; Forensic Accounting

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, N. (2019). Konstruksi Akuntansi Kerugian, Praktik Kepailitan Mengungkapkan Fraud Laporan Keuangan Klien. Jurnal Riset Bisnis, 3(1), 9–19.

Albrecht, W. S. et al. (2019). Fraud Examination 6th Edition (6th ed.). U.S: Cengage Learning.

Anggraini, D., Triharyati, E., Novita, H. A., & Bina. (2019). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif dalam Pengungkapan Fraud. Costing: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, 2, 372–380.

Apandi, R. N. N., & Pradista, Y. (2014). Penggunaan Akuntansi Forensik dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Kepailitan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 2(2), 314–325.

Apandi, R. N. N., Dewi Yr, R., & Pradista, Y. (2013). Akuntansi Forensik dalam Proses Kepailitan di Pengadilan Niaga dan Potensi Fraud pada Perusahaan Pailit (Studi Kualitatif). Prosiding Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar, 52–58.

Arboleda, F. J. M., Luna, A. G., & Torres, I.-D. (2018). Fraud detection-oriented operators in a data warehouse based on forensic accounting techniques. Computer Fraud & Security, 2018(10), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(18)30098-8

Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur Penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik (6th ed.). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Artantri, L. P. R. M., Handajani, L., & Pituringsih, E. (2016). Peran E-Procurement terhadap Pencegahan Fraud pada Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Daerah di Pulau Lombok. Jurnal NeO-Bis, 10(1), 16–32.

Astiti, S. H. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Kurator Berdasarkan Prinsip Independensi Menurut Hukum Kepailitan. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 5(2), 277–298.

Bologna, J. (1993). Handbook on Corporate Fraud: Prevention, Detection, and Investigation. U.K: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Carlos, A. M., Kosack, E., & Luis, C. P. (2019). Bankruptcy, Discharge, and the Emergence of Debtor Right in Eighteenth-Century England. Enterprise & Society, 20(2), 475–506. https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2018.69

Dinasmara, C. K., & Adiwibowo, A. S. (2020). Deteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish M – Score dan Prediksi Kebangkrutan Menggunakan Altman Z – Score: Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Termasuk dalam Indeks LQ – 45 Tahun 2016 – 2018. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 9(3), 1–15.

Ellis, J., & Slater, E. (2017). Litigation Finance in Bankruptcy: Unlocking Value for Creditor. American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, 36(3), 34-35,43.

Gultom, S. A., & Safrida, E. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Diamond dan Gone Theory terhadap Academic Fraud: Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Akuntansi Se-Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Eksis, 9(3), 113–127.

Hartono, D. T. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kepailitan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion, 1(4), 1–9.

Haryantho, B., Shubhan, M. H., & Zaidun, M. (2020). The Principle of Solvency as a Consideration for Judge in Solving Bankruptcy Case in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 96(3), 83–84. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/96-03

Jumansyah, Dewi, N. L., & En, T. K. (2011). Akuntansi Forensik dan Prospeknya terhadap Penyelesaian Masalah-Masalah Hukum di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Problematika Hukum dalam Implementasi Bisnis dan Investasi (Perspektif Multidisipliner), 1–9.

Kartoningrat, R. B., & Andayani, I. (2020b). Karakteristik Fraud dalam Hukum Kepailitan. Jurnal Perspektif, 25(3), 190–204.

Kılıç, B. İ. (2020). The Effects of Big Data on Forensic Accounting Practices and Education. Contemporary Issues in Audit Management and Forensic Accounting (Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, Vol. 102), Emerald Publishing Limited, 102, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920200000102005

Kornelis, Y., & Amboro, F. Y. P. (2020). Implementasi Restrukturisasi dalam Prosesi Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang di Indonesia. Jurnal Selat, 7(2), 254–277.

Liodorova, J., & Voronova, I. (2020). Financial Ratios for Detection of Companyís Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fraud: Similarities and Differences. Soci‚lo Zin‚tÚu VÁstnesis, 1(30), 7–29.

Lune, H. (Hunter C., & Berg, B. L. 2017). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (9th Editio). California: Pearson.

Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nugroho, S. A. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia dalam Teori dan Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: PrenadaMedia Grup.

Oseni, & Idris, A. (2017). Forensic Accounting and Financial Fraud in Nigeria: Problems and Prospects. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 3(1), 23–33.

Özcan, Ü. A. (2019). Analyzing The Impact of Forensic Accounting on the Detection of Financial Information Manipulation. MANAS Journal of Social Studies, 8(2), 1744–1760.

Panjaitan, I. A. (2018). Whistleblowing: Meningkatkan Hasil Audit Forensik dalam Pengungkapan Tindakan Korupsi oleh Auditor Pemerintah. Jurnal Insitusi Politeknik Ganesha Medan Juripol, 1(1), 50–60.

Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jakarta: Presiden Republik Indonesia.

Republik Indonesia. (2017). Laporan Tahuan 2016 Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Republik Indonesia. (2018). Laporan Tahuan 2017 Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 tahun 2018. Jakarta: Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.

Republik Indonesia. (2019). Laporan Tahuan 2018 Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Republik Indonesia. (2020). Laporan Tahuan 2019 Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Republik Indonesia. (2021). Laporan Tahuan 2020 Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Umum. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.

Riza, A. (2020). Akuntansi Forensik dalam Penyelesaian Tugas Kurator pada Perkara Kepailitan. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Sadaf, R., Oláh, J., Popp, J., & Máté, D. (2018). An Investigation of the Influence of the Worldwide Governance and Competitiveness on Accounting Fraud Cases: A Cross-Country Perspective. Sustainability, 10(3), 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030588

Saija, R. (2018). Perlindungan Kreditur atas Pailit yang Diajukan Debitur dalam Proses Peninjauan Kembali di Pengadilan Niaga. Jurnal Sasi, 24(2), 114–123.

Saputra, S. T. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Kreditur Akibat Adanya Pailit yang Diajukan oleh Debitur Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Kepailitan. Jurnal Rechtens, 9(1), 65–76.

Sembiring, S. (2017). Eksistensi Kurator dalam Pranata Hukum Kepalitan. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 3(1).

Sharp, E. (2018). Invitation to Qualitative Fieldwork: A Multilogical Approach (1st editio). U.K: Ed-Tech Press.

Suci, I. D. A. (2018). Karakteristik Hukum Acara Renvoi Prosedur dalam Perkara Kepailitan. Universitas Jember.

Wiharti, R. R., & Novita, N. (2020). Dampak Penerapan Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigasi dalam Mendeteksi Fraud Pengadaan Barang/Jasa. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Humanika, 10(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiah.v10i2.24698

Yusuf, H., & Isgiyarta, J. (2019). Analisis Praktik Penghindaran Pajak di Bidang Impor pada Kepailitan Perusahaan Ekspor Impor. Jurnal BPPK, 12(1), 20–30.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jati.v5i1.12985

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia is indexed by :

 

Office:

Editorial of Jati UMY, Building D, Jl. Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Yogyakarta.

Telp: (0274) 387656
Fax: (0274) 387646
WA: +62 858-3939-7548 (Puspita Dewi)
Email: jati@umy.ac.id

Based on a work at https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jati/index

Creative Commons License
Jati : Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.