Omnibus Law on Job Creation: State Capture?

Siska Ambarwati

Abstract


The study aims to analyze whether there is a state capture in making the Job Creation Law. Since the Job Creation Law was raised, many parties have criticized the existence of the Law because in the making of the Job Creation Law it is believed that it is more beneficial to employers, giving rise to an indication of state capture in its making. The research method used is a form of normative research with a statutory approach. The result shows that there is a state capture carried out by the authorities and employers in the making of the Job Creation Law. About 262 or 45.5 percent of the 575 House of Representatives members are affiliated with the company and therefore the regulations to be made more favorable for employers or investors while the welfare of workers is at stake. The rushed legislative process causes the values and aspirations of the people to be unable to be proportionally aggregated and accommodated, and this is certainly contrary to the principle of participation and the principle of openness as stipulated in the provisions of laws and regulations.


Keywords


corruption; omnibus law on job creation; state capture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Books with an author

Arief, B.N. (2001). Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana.

Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arief, B.N. (2007). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam

Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Arief, B.N. (2015). Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Nasional (Indonesia). Semarang: Penerbit

Pustaka Magister Hukum.

Hamzah, A. (1991). Korupsi di Indonesia dan Pemecahannya. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka

Utama.

Ibrahim, J. (2012). Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.

Jerry, B. et al. (2020). Tinjauan Lingkungan Hidup 2020: Menabur Investasi, Menuai Krisis

Multidimensi. Jakarta: Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (WALHI)

Keraf, A.S. (2010). Filsafat Lingkungan Hidup: Alam Sebagai Sebuah Sistem Kehidupan

Bersama Fritjof Capra. Yogyakarta: Kanisius

Magdoff, F. & Foster, J.B. (2018). Lingkungan Hidup dan Kapitalisme: Sebuah Pengantar.

Jakarta: Marjin Kiri

Marzuki, P.M. (2008). Penelitiаn hukum. Jakarta: Kencаnа.

Mulyadi, L. (2008). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana: Perspektif, Teoritis, dan Praktik.

Bandung: Alumni.

Poerwadarminta, W.J.S. (1982). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PN Balai

Pustaka.

Sasmita, R.A. (2004). Sekitar Masalah Korupsi: Aspek Nasional dan Aspek Internasional.

Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Surachmin & Cahaya, S. (2011). Strategi & Teknik Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Wijayanti, S.N. & Satriawan, I. (2009). Hukum Tata Negara. Yogyakarta: Fakultas

Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

World Bank. (2000). Anticorruption in Transition: A Contribution to the Policy Debate.

Washington DC: World Bank, p .xv-xvii

Journal Articles

Adelina, F. (2019). Bentuk-bentuk Korupsi Politik. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(1), 59-75.

URL: https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/256

Alam, S. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis atas Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Praktek di

Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Replik, 5(2), 157-171. URL:

https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.31000%

Fjhr.v5i2.924

Dassah, M.O. (2018). Theoretical Analysis of State Capture and Its Manifestation as a

Governance Problem in South Africa. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in

Southern Africa, 14(1), 1-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v14i1.473

Hariyani, H.F. (2016). Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Korupsi di Kawasan

Asia Pasifik. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebjakan Pembangunan, 5(2), 32-44. URL:

http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/82576

Kaseger, R.B. (2017). Perbuatan Merugikan Keuangan Negara Berdasarkan UndangUndang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, 6(6), 14-22. URL:

https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/16949

Kurniawan, F. (2020). Problematika Pembentukan RUU Cipta Kerja dengan Konsep

Omnibus Law pada Klaster Ketenagakerjaan Pasal 89 Angka 5 tentang

Pemberian Pesangon Kepada Pekerja yang di PHK. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 5(1),

-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.21067/jph.v5i1.4437

Nasution, R.D. (2013). Korupsi dan Pelanggaran Hak Ekonomi, Sosial, dan Budaya di

Indonesia. Jurnal Aristo, 1(2), 1-17. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.24269/ars.v1i2.23

Purawan, A.A. (2014). Korupsi Legalisasi dalam Proses Pembentukan PerundangUndangan (Legislative Corruption in Law Making Process). Rechtsvinding, 3(3),

-371. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i3.30

Ramiza, H. (2020). Korupsi State Capture sebagai Crime Against Humanity. Media

Iuris, 3(2), 181-198. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/mi.v3i2.20891

Santoso, L. et al. (2014). Korupsi dan Mentalitas: Kendala Kultural dalam

Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan, dan Politik, 27(4),

-183. URL:

https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.20473%

Fmkp.V27I42014.159-172

Sanusi, H.M.A. (2009). Relasi Antar Korupsi dan Kekuasaan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(2), 83-

URL:

https://mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/ejurnal/pdf/ejurnal_Volume%206

%20Nomor%202,%20Juli%202009.pdf

Setiadi, W. (2018). Korupsi di Indonesia (Penyebab, Bahaya, Hambatan, dan Upaya

Pemberantasan, serta Regulasi). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15 (3), 249-262. URL:

http://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/issue/view/19

Setiyono, B. (2017). Memahami Korupsi di Daerah Pasca Desentralisasi: Belajar dari

Empat Studi Kasus. Politika, 8(11), 27-62. doi:

https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.8.1.2017.27-62

Sitorus, L.E. (2011). State Capture: is it a Crime? How the World Perceived it. Indonesia

Law Review, 1(2), 45-68. URL: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/163010-EN-state-capture-is-it-acrime-how-the-worl.pdf

Waluyo, B. (2014). Optimalisasi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis,

(2), 169-182. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.35586/.v1i2.149

Internet:

Geotimes. (2020). Omnibus Law dan Ancaman Korupsi Legalisasi. Available online from:

https://geotimes.co.id/opini/omnibus-law-dan-ancaman-korupsi-legislasi/.

[Accessed on October 12, 2020]

Hellman, J. & Kaufmann, D. (2001). Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in

Transition Economies. IMF (Finance & Development). Available online from:

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/09/hellman.htm

[Accessed on November 25, 2020]

Hukumonline.com. (2020). RUU Cipta Kerja untuk Kepentingan Siapa? Available online

from: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5e4fdfbb4ff5a/ruu-ciptakerja--untuk-kepentingan-siapa/ . [Accessed on March 12, 2021]

Latifah, M. (2020). Perumusan Sanksi Pidana dalam RUU tentang Cipta Kerja. Available

online from: https://berkas.dpr.go.id/puslit/files/info_singkat/Info%20Singkat-XII-6-IIP3DI-Maret-2020-222.pdf. [Accessed on October 14, 2020]

Martini, M. (2014). State Capture: An Overview. Available online from:

https://www.transparency.org/files/content/corruptionqas/State_capture_an_

overview_2014.pdf [Accessed on November 25, 2020]

Pusat Kajian Anti Korupsi (PUKAT) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, RILIS:

Catatan PUKAT UGM terhadap RUU Cipta Kerja. Available online

from: https://pukatkorupsi.ugm.ac.id/?p=4695 . [Accessed on March 10, 2021].

Sekretariat Jenderal dan Badan Keahlian Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik

Indonesia. (2016). Rencana Strategis Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia

-2019. Available online from:

http://www.dpr.go.id/publikasi/Renstra%20DPR.pdf. [Accessed on October

, 2020]

Suara.com. (2020). 5 Isi Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja yang Dianggap Merugikan Pekerja.

Available online from: https://www.suara.com/news/2020/08/14/135509/5-

isi-omnibus-law-cipta-kerja-yang-dianggap-merugikan-pekerja [Accessed on

March 16, 2021].

Tempo. (2020). Pengusaha Kuasai Parlemen. Available online from

https://majalah.tempo.co/read/nasional/158519/pengusaha-kuasai-parlemen. [Accessed

on September 14, 2020]

WALHI. (2020). Omnibus Law RUU Cilaka: Aturan Berwatak Kolonial. Available online

from: https://www.walhi.or.id/omnibus-law-ruu-cilaka-aturan-berwatak-kolonial.

[Accessed on October 14, 2020]

Proceeding:

Rafiqi, I.D. (2020). Alternatif Model Pembentukan Hukum Berbasis Paradigma Profetik

(Kritik terhadap RUU (Omnibus Law) Cipta Kerja dan Sebuah Tawaran Solusi).

Proceedings of Seminar Nasional Dinamika Omnibus Law di Era New Normal:

Peluang serta Tantangan bagi Profesi Hukum, Malang: 22-23 March 2020

Laws and Regulations:

United Nations Convention Against Corruption

Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation

Law No. 15 of 2019 in conjunction with Law No. 12 of 2011 on Law Making Procedure

Law No. 20 of 2001 in conjunction with Law No. 31 of 1999 on Corruption Eradication

Academic Draft of Bill on Job Creation Law




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v28i1.10654

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Siska Ambarwati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

             

  

JMH Visitor