ANALISIS DOKTRINAL TARAF SINKRONISASI VERTIKAL PENERAPAN NILAI KEADILAN SOSIAL DI BIDANG PENGELOLAAN SUMBER DAYA AIR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v16i1.15469Keywords:
Vertical Synchronization, Social Justice, Water ResourcesAbstract
The researches about Water Resources Management were often have been done by previous researchers, but haven’t reach the basic idea of water resources management related the social justice. The doctrinal analysis was chosen to examine synchronization in vertical perspective. There are two problems in this research, those are (1) How vertical synchronization grade in Water Resources Management? (2) Why vertical synchronization grade in Water Resources Management was very difficult to be realized? These problems will be solved by doctrinalresearch approach. The results show that there is inconsistency in implementing of social justice value in regulation of water resources management. There is no vertical synchronization in regulation between UUD 1945, UUSDA, PP 16 Tahun 2005, Permendagri No. 23 Tahun 2006 serta Perpres No. 77 Tahun 2007. Based on analysis of document about RUU SDA meeting and Decision of Constitutional Court (MK) about Judicial Review of UUSDA, there was evident that DPR and Constitutional Court were trapped into legal-positivism thinking. They did not conduct ‘moral reading’ of Indonesian constitution. Through Perpres No. 77 Tahun 2007 that permits the foreign investors are able to occupy the share of water corporation until 95% more shows that disharmony in vertical perspective has occurred in regulation of water resources management.References
Asshidiqie, Jimly, 2006, Kemerdekaan Berserikat, Pembubaran Partai Politik dan Mahkamah
Konstitusi, Jakarta, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MK.
Asshidiqie, Jimly, dan Ali Safa’at, 2006, Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum, Jakarta, Konstitusi
Press.
Asshidiqie, Jimly, 2006, Hukum Acara Pengujian Undang-Undang, Jakarta, Sekretariat
Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia.
Barber, Charles V., 2003, The State, The Environment and Development: The Genesis of
Transformation of Social Forestry in New Order Indonesia, Berkeley, Doctoral Disertation
of California University.
Barry, Brian, 1989, Theories of Justice, Harverster-Wheatssheaf, London, Vol. I.
Darmodiharjo, Darji, 1979, Santiaji Pancasila, Jakarta, Usaha Nasional.
Dworkin, Ronald, 1996, Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of The American Constitution, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
Hadi, Sudharto P., 2002, Dimensi Hukum Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Semarang, BP.
UNDIP.
Hadi, Sudharto P., 2002, Dimensi Hukum Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Semarang, BP.
UNDIP.
Hamidi, Jazim, 2006, Kedudukan Hukum Naskah Proklamasi 17 Agustus 1945 dalam
Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 3, Nomor 1,
Februari 2006, Jakarta, MK RI.
Hanitijo S., Ronny, 1990, Metodologi Penelitian dan Yurimetri, Semarang, Ghalia Indonesia.
Himawan, Charles, 2003, Hukum Sebagai Panglima, Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Kaelan, 2003, Pendidikan Pancasila, Yogyakarta, Paradigma.
Kelsen, Hans, 1961, General Theory of Law and State, New York, Translated by Anders
Wedberg, Russel & Russel.
Notohamidjojo, 1975, Soal-soal Filsafat Hukum, Jakarta, BPK Gunung Mulia.
Pranarka, A.M.W., 1985, Sejarah Pemikiran tentang Pancasila, Jakarta, CSIS.
Rachman, Budhy Munawar, 2004, Refleksi Keadilan Sosial dalam Pemikiran Keagamaan,
dalam Keadilan Sosial Upaya Mencari Makna Kesejahteraan Bersama di Indonesia,
Jakarta, Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Rahardjo, Satjipto, 2007, Mendudukkan Undang-Undang Dasar (Suatu Pembahasan dari
Optik Ilmu Hukum Umum), Semarang, Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Rasuanto, Bur, 2005, Keadilan Sosial (Pandangan Deontologis Rawls dan Habermas),
Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sumaryono, E., 2002, Etika & Hukum: Relevansi Teori Hukum Kodrat Thomas Aquinas,
Yogyakarta, Penerbit Kanisius.
