Village Sovereignty in Dispute Resolution after Law No 6 of 2014 concerning Village

Ilham Yuli Isdiyanto

Abstract


The research was conducted in order to strengthen the position of the village as a form of social control institution in solving problems that is present in the village setting which began to disappear since the independence era. A descriptive-qualitative approach with a historical-normative method is used to find the concept of the village sovereignty, obtained from studies of primary and secondary legal data. The research aims to get a historical picture as a conceptual reflection and judicial basis for developing and legitimizing the village as the place for resolving disputes among the populace. Since the monarchy until the colonial era, the village was given the authority to solve the problems of its people independently, this authority is severed after entering the independence era. The government finally began to realize the importance of village as autonomous and independent through Law No. 6 of 2014 concerning Villages and strengthened by Supreme Court Regulation; PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning the Mediation Process in the Court. Through the Regulation, the village head now has the authority to resolve the problems among its populace and create agreements regarding it. Hence, support from the government is needed to the respective village heads and the chosen delegates through regulation and mediation training

Keywords


alternative dispute resolution; mediation; village law; village sovereignty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Book

Attamimi, A. H. S. (1990). Peranan Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Negara. Universitas Indonesia.

Boechari. (1975). Jayapatra Sekelumit Tentang Pelaksanaan Hukum dalam Masyarakat Jawa Kuno. In Simposium Sejarah Hukum. Bandung: BPHN Kemenkuham.

Eko, S. (2005). Mencari Model Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Desa. In R Widodo Triputro dan Supardal (Ed.), Pembaharuan Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan STPMD “APMD” dan APMD Press Yogyakarta.

Hadikusuma, H. (1981). Hukum Tatanegara Adat. Jakarta: Alumni.

Hatta, M. (1966). Demokrasi Kita. Djakarta: PT Pusaka Antara.

Kusumaatmadja, M. (2006). Konsep-Konsep Hukum dalam Pembangunan; Kumpulan Karya Tulisan Prof. Dr. Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, S.H.,LL.M ((Ed.). Otje Salman dan Eddy Damian, Ed.). Bandung: PT Alumni.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2010). Cetak Biru Pembaharuan Pengadian 2010-2035. Retrieved from https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/media/198

Mertokusumo, S. (2011). Sejarah Peradilan dan Perundang-Undangannya Di Indonesia Sejak 1942 dan Apakah Kemanfaatannya Bagi Kita Bangsa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

Pusat Mediasi Indonesia Universitas Gajah Mada. (n.d.). Modul Pendidikan & Pelatihan Mediator Bersertifikat. Yogyakarta.

Raharjo, S. (2011). Peradaban Jawa: Dari Mataram Kuno sampai Majapahit Akhir (Cet II). Jakarta: Komunitas Bambu.

Wignjosoebroto, S. (2014). Desentralisasi dalam Tata Pemerintahan Kolonial Hindia-Belanda: Kebijakan dan Upaya Sepanjang Babak Akhir Kekuasaan Kolonial di Indonesia 1900-1940. Malang: Banyumedia.

Yamin, M. (1962). Tatanegara Madjapahit (Parwa III). Djakarta: Jajasan Prapantja.

Article Journal

Alia, M. I. (2017). Jaminan Konstitusionalitas Hak Asal Usul Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Sumatera Barat. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan, 1(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v1i2.550

Basuki, U. (2017). Desa Mawa Cara Negara Mawa Tata : Dinamika Pengaturan Desa Dalam Sistem. Al Mazahib, 5, 321–344. Retrieved from http://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/syariah/almazahib/article/view/1424

Wantu, F.M.. (2013). Kendala hakim dalam menciptakan kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan di peradilan perdata *. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 25(2), 205–218.

Fitriati. (2017). Karakteristik Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Secara Informal Melalui Peradilan Adat. Media Hukum, 24(2), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2017.0092.164-171

Hanifah, M. (2016). Kajian Yuridis: Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan. ADHAPER : Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 2(1). Retrieved from https://jhaper.org/index.php/JHAPER/article/view/21

Rahayu, S. L., et. al. (2016). Penguatan Fungsi Kepala Desa Sebagai Mediator Perselisihan Masyarakat Di Desa. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 5(2), 340–360. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v95i0.2812

Syamsu, S. (2008). Memahami Perkembangan Desa di Indonesia. Jurnal Government Ilmu Pemerintahan, I(I).

Taufiq, M. et. al. (2017). Mediasi Sebagai Penguatan Kearifan Lokal Banyumas Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana. Media Hukum, 24(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2017.0089.137-146

Internet

Badan Pusat Statistik. (n.d.). Jumlah Desa/Kelurahan Menurut Provinsi dan Topografi Wilayah, 2003-2018. Retrieved from www.bps.go.id website: https://www.bps.go.id/linkTableDinamis/view/id/907

Matanasi, P. (2017). Asal-Usul Rukun Tetangga. Retrieved from tirto website: https://tirto.id/asal-usul-rukun-tetangga-cBhG




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.20190136

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
The Jurnal Media Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 

JMH Visitor