The Position of Amicus Curiae under the Indonesian Law of Evidence

Fadil Aulia; Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin

doi:10.18196/jmh.20201152

The Position of Amicus Curiae under the Indonesian Law of Evidence

Fadil Aulia, Muchlas Rastra Samara Muksin

Abstract

The use of amicus curiae has been common in Indonesia, especially in criminal courts. Although there is no clear regulation on amicus curiae, in practice, it has been submitted more than 24 times to the courts. Even there are some judges who consider amicus curiae in making their decisions. This paper aims to determine and examine the legal standing and the strength of amicus curiae under the Indonesian law of evidence. This normative legal research relies on the secondary data in the form of legal material. It is found that the opinion of an amicus curiae, which is usually submitted to the court in written form, could be used as a documentary evidence as intended in Article 187 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, it has no binding force. Therefore, the judges are free whether or not to consider the opinion submitted by the amicus curiae.

Keywords

amicus curiae; law of evidence; criminal procedure

Full Text:

PDF

References

Books:

Hamzah, A. (2016). Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Dewata, M, F, N & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualism of Normative & Empirical Legal Research. Yogyakarta: Student Library.

Harahap, M, Y. (2016). Discussion on Problems and Implementation of KUHAP (Court Session Examination, Cassation, and Review). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hiariej, E, O. (2012). Principles of Legality & Legal Discovery in Criminal Law. Jakarta, Erlangga.

Hiariej, E, O. (2012). Theory and Law of Evidence. Jakarta: Erlangga

Mertokusumo, S. (2014). Legal Discovery An Introduction, Revised Edition. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Muhammad, R. (2007). Contemporary Criminal Procedure Law. Bandung :PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sasangka, H. & Rosita, L. (2003). Law of Evidence In Criminal Cases. Bandung: Bandar Maju.

Journal Articles:

Rusyadi. (2016). Strength of Evidence in Criminal Court proceedings. Journal of Law Prjoris, 5 (2): 128-134.

Mohan, S, C. (2010) The Amicus Curiae: Friends No More?. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 20(2): 352-374.

Kochevar, S. (2013). Amici Curiae in Civil Law Jurisdictions. The Yale Law Journal, 122(6): 1653-1669.

Gao, H. S. (2006). Amicus Curiae in WTO Dispute Settlement: Theory and Practice. China Right Forum, No.1 Edition 2006: 51-57.

Documents:

Wicaksana, D, A. Dkk. (2018). Written Comments as Amicus Curiae (Court Friend) Regarding Case Number 1612 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN.Mdn in Medan District Court, Material for Consideration for the Panel of Judges. Jakarta: Indonesian Judicial Monitoring Society.

Aminah, S. (2014). Becoming a Court Friend: A Guide to Compiling an Amicus Brief. Jakarta: ILRC-Hivos.

Ma'ruf, N, J. (2018). Amicus Curiae's Position in the Resolution of Defamation in the Court (Case Study of Decision Number 1269 / Pid.B / 2009 / PN.Tng), (Thesis, Faculty of Law, UII). Thesis, Islamic University of Indonesia.

Adnan, A. W. (2016). The Negative Application of Evidence Theory according to the Law (negatief Wettelijke Stelsel in the Murder Criminal Court Session (Case Study of Court Decision No.1361 / Pid.B / 2005 / PN.Jkt.Pst). Thesis, Gadjah Mada University.

Rishad, A. (2018). The Role of Amicus Curiae for Judges in Deciding in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Thesis, Gadjah Mada University.

LBH Jakarta. (2017). Amicus Curiae (Amicus Brief) on the Blasphemy case of Mr. Basuki Tjahaja Purnama alias Ahok. Jakarta: LBH Jakarta.

Regulations:

Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1981 Number 76, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3285).

Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2009 Number 157, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5076).

Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 1999 Number 165, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3886).

Muaro District Court Decision Number: 45 / PID.B / 2012 / PN.MR.

Denpasar District Court Decision Number: 780 / Pid.B / 2014 / PN.DPS.

Internet:

https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/dukung-hukum-bagi-terpidana-penodaan-agama-meliana-terus-bertambah/4582316.html accessed on 29 October 2018 at 22.45 WIB

https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/06/19/14290231/kontras-serahkan-amicus-curiae-kasus-penyiraman-air-keras-novel-baswedanaccessed July 21 at. 15.00 WIB

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.20201152