About the Journal

Focus and Scope

JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) focuses on the research and research review in the field of engineering material and manufacturing processes. The journal covers various themes namely:

  • Engineering Designs
  • Process Optimization
  • Process Problem Solving
  • Manufacturing Processes
  • Automation Processes
  • Advanced Materials
  • Solid and Fluid Mechanics
  • Energy Harvesting 
  • Renewable Energy
 
 

Peer Review Process

Determination of the article that will be published in JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) carried out through double-blind peer review by editors and reviewers by considering two main aspects, namely: relevance and contribution of articles on the material and manufacture theory and practical development. Editors and reviewers provide constructive feedback on the evaluation results to the author.

  1. Submission of manuscript by author(s). The submission is only processed via online i.e. OJS of JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur).
  2. All submitted manuscripts are read by JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) Editor in Chief initially for desk evaluation (Point 2 and 3). In this stage the submitted manuscript would be checked whether it complies JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) author guidelines and template for submission, also whether the manuscript matches JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) focus and scope. If appropriate, the next process would be carried out, and if not, we would reject the manuscript so that it could be submitted to another journal.
  3. The submitted manuscript would be checked with Turnitin (similarity check). If the level of similarity is more than 15%, the manuscripts would be rejected promptly without substantive review by section editor and peer reviewer. The submitted manuscripts that passed this stage would be sent to section editor.
  4. The submitted manuscript would be reviewed by the assigned section editor to find out whether it contributes sufficiently to the development of science and practice in the field of development economics and multidisciplinary concern to systemic problems in developing countries. Manuscripts with insignificant novelty are rejected in this stage. While the manuscript that qualifies would be proceeded to the substantive review stage by two people namely a section editor and a peer reviewer.
  5. Once substantive review process is finished, the JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) Editor in Chief then make a decision based on the section editor's and  reviewer’s recommendation with several decision possibilities as the following: (1) rejected = the manuscript is not considered for publication in JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) due to several reasons such as the manuscript has no significant novelty and contribution, the manuscript has been prepared poorly, very similar study was found, etc.; (2) accepted with major revision = the manuscript requires substantial revisions prior to publication. It might associate with state of the art, novelty, significance of the study, methodology, and etc. The editor would give four to 12 weeks to complete the revisions; (3) accepted with minor revision = the manuscript needs few revisions but not substantial prior to publication. Usually, it relates with JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) author guidelines compliance. The editor would give one to four weeks to complete the revisions; (4) accepted without revision = the manuscript would be published without any revisions. However, proofreading to the manuscript still would be conducted.
  6. The submitted manuscript that is accepted with revisions (minor or major) would get comments (feedback) from section editor and peer reviewer and would be returned to the author(s) for revisions.
  7. The author(s) is/are given certain time to complete manuscript revisions in accordance with the status of manuscript i.e. accepted with minor revision or accepted with major revision (refer to explanation about decision possibilities above). Extra time to complete the revisions should be asked to the JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) Editor in Chief via email (jmpm@umy.ac.id). If the author(s) does/do not submit the revised manuscript until the due date and no notification sent to JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) editorial team, then the author(s) is/are deemed to resign. It is important to note that revisions submissions should be accompanied with Author(s) responses form.
  8. Manuscript that has gone through final revisions and got acceptance would be published in the JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) in the edition determined by the JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) Editor in Chief. The author(s) might ask the Editor in Chief if he/she/they prefer(s) to publish his/her/their article in specific editions (volume and number). For this purpose, the author(s) must submit the request to the JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) Editor in Chief via email (jmpm@umy.ac.id).

NOTE:

  • The manuscript review process for desk evaluation (point 2 and 3) takes one week in maximum. Manuscript that passes this stage can be seen from its status in OJS that is changed from "Awaiting Assignment" to "In Review". Meanwhile, substantive review by section editor and reviewer usually takes four to eight (8) weeks (point 4). This review period depends on the editors and reviewers' duration in reviewing the manuscript. If the author(s) does not get confirmation from the JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) for a long time, the author(s) can confirm by email at jmpm@umy.ac.id

 

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative.

 

Plagiarism Policy

JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) will immediately reject papers leading to plagiarism or self-plagiarism. Articles submitted to JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) will be screened for plagiarism using Turnitin plagiarism Checker detection tools with similarity maximum 20%. 

 

Author Fees

JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) is a journal publications that are not oriented to profit. Therefore, for the publication process, JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) regarding certain costs, namely:

  1. The cost of article submission: FREE
  2. Processing Fees for the publication of articles received: IDR 500.000
 

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.

 

Publication Ethics

JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. ISSN ISSN (print): 2580-3271 and ISSN (online): 2656-5897. JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) publishes the new editions every June and December. By June 2017, JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) had published both printed (book) and electronic (PDF) version. Electronic articles are accessible openly on the web page: http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jmpm 

 

Duties of Editor

Publication Decisions

The editors of JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) ensure that all submitted manuscripts being considered for publication undergo peer-review by at least two reviewers who are experts in the field. The Principal Editor is responsible for deciding which of the manuscripts submitted to the journal will be published, based on the validation of the work in question, its importance to researchers and readers, the reviewers’ comments, and such legal requirements as are currently in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The Editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play
Editors evaluate submitted manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit (importance, originality, study’s validity, clarity) and its relevance to the journal’s scope, without regard to the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy or institutional affiliation. Decisions to edit and publish are not determined by the policies of governments or any other agencies outside of the journal itself. The Principal Editor has full authority over the entire editorial content of the journal and the timing of publication of that content.

Confidentiality

The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

The Editors will not use unpublished information disclosed in a submitted manuscript for their own research purposes without the authors’ explicit written consent. Privileged information or ideas obtained by editors as a result of handling the manuscript will be kept confidential and not used for their personal advantage. Editors will recuse themselves from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships/connections with any of the authors, companies or institutions connected to the papers; instead, they will ask another member of the editorial board to handle the manuscript.

Management of unethical behavior(s)

The editors, together with the publisher(s), should take rationally responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented regarding a submitted manuscript or published article. Every reported act of unethical publishing behavior will be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication.

Duties of Authors

Reporting Standards

Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed and the results, followed by an objective discussion of the significance of the work. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Review articles should be accurate, objective and comprehensive, while editorial ‘opinion’ or perspective pieces should be clearly identified as such. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data access and retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access, and should, in any event, be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another's paper as the author's own paper, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts of another's paper (without attribution), to claiming results from research conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. We will check each manuscript using a plagiarism checker (Turnitin) to ensure the originality of the article. Furthermore, each submitted article should be accompanied by a letter of statement from the author(s) stating that the article is free from plagiarism.

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication

Papers describing essentially the same research should not be published in more than one journal or primary publication. Hence, authors should not submit for consideration a manuscript that has already been published in another journal. Submission of a manuscript concurrently to more than one journal is unethical publishing behavior and unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of sources

Authors should ensure that they have properly acknowledged the work of others, and should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately (from the conversation, correspondence or discussion with third parties) must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Authors should not use information obtained in the course of providing confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications unless they have obtained the explicit written permission of the author(s) of the work involved in these services.

Authorship of the paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or the publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, it is the obligation of the author to promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Hazards and human or animal subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. The authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.
For human subjects, the author should ensure that the work described has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans.  

Declaration of competing interests

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could be viewed as inappropriately influencing (bias) their work. All sources of financial support for the conduct of the research and/or preparation of the article should be disclosed, as should the role of the sponsor(s), if any, in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) had no such involvement, then this should be stated. The author must declare competing interests in the manuscript/paper template.

Image integrity

It is not acceptable to enhance, obscure, move, remove, or introduce a specific feature within an image. Adjustments of brightness, contrast, or color balance are acceptable if and as long as they do not obscure or eliminate any information present in the original. Manipulating images for improved clarity is accepted, but manipulation for other purposes could be seen as scientific ethical abuse and will be dealt with accordingly. Authors should comply with any specific policy for graphical images applied by the relevant journal, e.g. providing the original images as supplementary material with the article, or depositing these in a suitable repository.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

Copyright Notice

License

Creative Commons License


JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free to :

  1. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms, which include the following:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Copyright

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

  1. The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  2. The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
  3. Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  4. The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  5. The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
  6. If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.

 

Author Guidelines

 

A Short Title that Describes the Content

(Center, Bold, Arial 16, max 14 words) 

First Autora, Second Authorb, Third Authorc

a Institution/affiliation

Address, city, country

Telephone/fax of institution/affiliation

e-mail: xxxx@xxxx.xxx

b,c Institution/affiliation

Address, city, country

Telephone/fax of institution/affiliation

e-mail: xxxx@xxxx.xxx

 Abstract

                 Abstract is written in English and should be presented briefly and accurately also determine its relevance to its interest. Abstract should be informative and completely self-explanatory, provides clear statements on the problems and proposed approach or solutions, and point out major findings and deduction. Abstract should consist of 100 to 200 words and is written in past tense. Use nomenclature standard and avoid abbreviation. Furthermore, keywords are written to be used as indexing services. The use of keywords may increase the ease with which interested parties to find our articles.

                   Keywords: keywords consists of 3 to 5 words or phrases separated by semi colon

1.  Introduction          

       This guideline is a template for writing the manuscript for JMPM Journal submission and authors are allowed to modify this template for submission. If the manuscript was really having high originality, which proposed a new approach or algorithm, additional chapter is allowed to be after the "Introduction" chapter before the "Methods" chapter to explain briefly on it.

       This manuscript divided into four chapters where those are Introduction, Methods, Result and Discussion, and the last chapter is Conclusion. The Introduction should provide clear background and statements of the problem, review of related literature on the subject, proposed approach and/or research design, and the new value of research which it is innovation. It should be understandable to colleagues from a broad range of scientific disciplines. In Methods, authors should present and describe the method used in research; presenting instruments and objects of research with its explanation and time to conduct research. For Result and Discussion chapter, authors should present their research finding and its description. It would be more interesting manuscript when in this chapter, the author complete it with figures, tables and equations.    Last but not the least is Conclusion chapter. In this chapter, authors should present their explanatory deductive reasoning based on research finding. The authors also allowed giving suggestion for further research and researchers.

2.  Writing Layout     

       Manuscript should be submitted online in English via Journal website. Authors invited to register on JEMMME website to get username and password for submission login. Registration helps authors to have access to submit the article, track it and getting information on the process of reviewing.

2.1   Manuscript processing

       The main text format should not be exceed 14 pages and is written in Microsoft Office Word (.doc/.docx) format by attaching figures and table also equations (if available). The text should be written orderly in single justified column on A4 paper by margin for left, right, top, and bottom is 3 cm. It is no need to embed page number as it would be reordered at printing processes.

2.2   Writing Format

       A title of article should be the fewest possible words that accurately describe the content of the paper.  Indexing and abstracting services depend on the accuracy of the title, extracting from it keywords useful in cross-referencing and computer searching. An improperly titled paper may never reach the audience for which it was intended, so be specific.

       Organization and citation of the bibliography are made in Vancouver style in sign [1], [2] and so on. The terms in foreign languages are written italic.

2.3   Sub-title level 1

       Sub-title should be presented only in three levels. The fourth would not be allowed. For sub-title level 1, it is written in Arial font, bold, 10 pt and in single space. The number for sub-title is written with two numbers and separated by dot.

2.3.1 Sub-title level 2

       Sub-title level 2 is written in small caps title case with 10 pt Arial font in single space. It is written in italic bold and numbered by three number separated by dot.

a)    Sub-title level 3

       Sub-title level 3 is written in small caps title case with 10 pt Arial font in single space. It is written in italic bold and numbered by a letter in closed bracket.

b)    Sub-title level 3

       In every sub-title, they are written in left alignment. 

3.  Writing Structure

       The authors’ manuscripts should be completed with title, abstract, keywords and the main text. Furthermore, the authors should present tables, figures, and equations in good order.

3.1   Title

       Title of manuscript should be brief and informative. Avoid writing abbreviation and equation (if it is possible). Academic title and rank are not allowed to be written behind the name of authors.

3.2   Abstract

       Write abstract in brief explanation and not exceed 200 words. It should be presented purpose of research, prominent finding and deduction.

3.3   Keywords

       Keywords consist of terms and multiple concepts in research. Avoid presenting abbreviation in keywords, it is better for the authors to present phrases. They would be used for indexing purposes. It is written before the main text with 3 to 5 words or phrases separated by semi colon.

3.4   Main Text

       Main text here is what had been mentioned in the previous parts, which consist of four chapters.

3.4.1 Introduction

       As the initial of the main text, the authors must present explanatory reasoning of their research, it is written in Introduction. In chapter of Introduction, the authors must present their purpose, background and summary of research finding and explain how the author addressed the problem.

3.4.2 Methods

       In methods, research chronological is explained including research design, research procedure (in the form of algorithms, Pseudocode or other), how to test and data acquisition. The description of research should be supported by references, so the explanation can be accepted scientifically.

3.4.3 Result and Discussion

       Research finding should be explained comprehensively here. Result or phenomenon describe in scientific. In discussion, significance of work result must be explored. Prevent to quote citations extensively and discussion of published literature. Results can be presented in figures, graphs, tables and others that make the reader understand easily. The discussion can be made in several sub-chapters.

3.4.3 Conclusion

       Write your deductive explanation for conclusion. Authors should persuade the reader to important matter of the article. Conclusion could be embedded with suggestion or recommendation for further research or researchers.

       Provide a statement on what is expected as stated in "Introduction" chapter. It can be ultimately result in "Results and Discussion" chapter, so there is compatibility. Moreover, it can also be added the prospect of the development of research finding and application prospects of further research.

4.  Manuscript Completeness

4.1   Tables or graphics

       Tables or graphics should be presented in the center. For table, it should be colorized and readable tables. Caption should be written above the table and numbered orderly based on the chapter (i.e. Table 1.1, Table 1.2 if it is in the first chapter. The front number shows the chapter and the second number after dot shows the order of table). It is written in 9 pt italic Arial font. Write the source under the table (if it is available) with the same font with the caption. But it is in regular font. For graphic, caption should be written under the graphic with 9 pt italic Arial font. Number format for graphic resemblance to the table number.

Table 4.1 Write caption of the table here

Carbon (C)

Silicon (Si)

Manganese(Mn)

Phosphor (P)

Sulfur (S)

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

0,17%

0,36%

1,11%

0,011%

0,018%

Source: Here is the example of writing source for the table

 

Graphic 4.1 Write caption of the graphic here

4.2   Figures

       Figures are presented in center as shown below. Caption for figures is as the tables’. But there is difference between them. For figures, caption must be written under the figures. And source is written under the caption.

 
   

 

 

Figure 4.1 Write caption of the figure here

Source: Here is the example of writing source for the figure

 

4.3   Mathematical Equations

       When the manuscript included mathematical equation, it should be written in order by number and followed by information needed.

                            (1)

Where Q is notation explanation, n is notation explanation, and D is also notation explanation, etc.

4.4   References

       The main references are international journals and proceeding. All references should be to the most pertinent and up-to-date sources.  It is recommended to use a library management application (Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, Referance Manager). References are written in IEEE style. Please use a consistent format for references – see examples below:

References

Journal:

[1] Author1 A, Author2 B. Title of Manuscript. Name of Journal or its Abbreviation. Year; Vol. (Issue): pages.


[2] Liu, X., Wang, M., Zhang, S., Pan, B. Application potential of carbon nanotubes in water treatment: A review. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2013; 25: 1263–1280.

Proceeding:

If the proceedings consist of several volumes:

[1]   Author1 A, Author2 B. Title of Manuscript. Name of Conference of Seminar. City. Year; volume: pages.

[2]   Sarma, P.K., Subramanyam, T., Kishore, P.S., Dharma Rao, V., Kakac, S, 2002, A new method to predict convective heat transfer in a tube with twisted tape inserts for turbulent flow, International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 41, 955–960

 

If the proceedings in single volume

[3]   Author1 A, Author2 B. Title of Manuscript. Name of Conference or Seminar. City. Year: pages.

[4]   Yamin L, Wanming C. Implementation of Single Precision Floating Point Square Root on FPGAs. IEEE Symposium on FPGA for Custom Computing Machines. Napa. 2008: 226-232.

Textbooks:

If the references are refer to specific page range in a book

[1]   Author1 A, Author2 B. The Title of the Book. Edition. City: Publisher. Year: pages.

[2]   Anderson, J. D., Wendt, J. Computational Fluid Dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1995: 25-29

Translated Books:

[1]   Original Author. Year. Title of the Translated Book. Translator. City: Publisher of the translated book. Year of the translated book.

[2]   Pabla. 2004. Sistem Distribusi Tenaga Listik. Abdul Hadi. Jakarta: Erlangga. 2007.

Thesis/Dissertation:

[1]   Author. Title of Thesis/Dissertation. Thesis/Dissertation. City & Name of University/Institute/College; Year.

[2]   Rusdi M. A Novel Fuzzy ARMA Model for Rain Prediction in Surabaya. PhD Thesis. Surabaya: Postgraduate ITS; 2009.

Paten:

[1]   Author1 A, Author2 B. Title (this should be in italics). Patent number (Patent). Year of publication.

[2]   Ahmad LP, Hooper A. The Lower Switching Losses Method of Space Vector Modulation. CN103045489 (Patent). 2007.

Standards:

[1]   Name of Standard Body/Institution. Standard number. Title (this should be in italics). Place of publication. Publisher. Year of publication.

[2]   IEEE Standards Association. 1076.3-2009. IEEE Standard VHDL Synthesis Packages. New York: IEEE Press; 2009.

Reports:

[1]   Author/Editor (if it is an editor/editors always put (ed./eds.) after the name). Title (this should be in italics). Organization. Report number: (this should be followed by the actual number in figures). Year of publication.

[2]   James S, Whales D. The Framework of Electronic Government. U.S. Dept. of Information Technology. Report number: 63. 2005.

 

Journal History

  1. JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) was established in June 2017.
  2. JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) has published both printed (book) and electronic (PDF) versions. ISSN 2656-5897 (Online) and 2580-3271 (Print).
  3. By December 2020, JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) had been indexed by Science and Technology Index (Sinta) and obtained accreditation predicate in grade 3 by the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of Indonesia, Decree (SK) No. 200/M/KPT/2020 valid from vol 2 no 1 (2018) until vol 6 no 2 (2022). 
  4. By May 2023, JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur) had been indexed by Science and Technology Index (Sinta) and obtained accreditation predicate in grade 3 by the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of Indonesia, Decree (SK) No. 79/E/KPT/2023 valid from Vol 6 No 1 (2022) until Vol 10 No 2 (2026).