Usia Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak dalam Perspektif Neurolaw

Authors

  • M. Hendri Agustiawan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9124-2205
  • Pujiyono Pujiyono Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
  • Umi Rozah Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v4i2.18206

Keywords:

Criminal offense, juvenile criminal responsibility, neurolaw

Abstract

Due to recent discoveries and technological advancements in neuroscience, we can gain a deeper understanding of the human brain that significantly impact juvenile criminal law, particularly concerning children's behavior and ability to regulate impulsive behavior. This study aims to analyze the current age of criminal responsibility in the Indonesian legal system using a neurolaw perspective that considers cognitive neuroscience and legal theory. The research utilizes normative legal research methodology with a statute approach and a neuroscience approach. The data obtained from literature research is then analyzed conceptually. The study results indicate that the age of criminal responsibility for children in Indonesia is 12 years; however, it has not yet reached 18 years. According to the neurolaw perspective, brain development within this age range is not fully matured and continues to undergo behavioral changes. This research implies the urgency of revising regulations regarding the age of criminal responsibility for children in Indonesia, considering the discoveries in neuroscience. Using a neurolaw perspective can encourage changes in legal policies that pay more attention to neurological factors in assessing juvenile criminal responsibility. As far as the law governs human behavior, the brain plays a crucial role in controlling that behavior. Therefore, a better understanding of the brain will lead to better and fairer laws.

References

AbuHasan, Q., Reddy, V., & Siddiqui, W. (2023). Neuroanatomy, Amygdala. StatPearls Publishing LLC. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537102/

Adleman, N. E., Menon, V., Blasey, C. M., White, C. D., Warsofsky, I. S., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L. (2002). A Developmental fMRI Study of the Stroop Color-Word Task. NeuroImage, 16(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1046

Ali, M. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Arain, M., Haque, M., Johal, L., Mathur, P., Nel, W., Rais, A., … Sharma, S. (2013). Maturation of the adolescent brain. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 9, 449–461. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S39776

Aronson, J. D. (2007). Brain imaging, culpability and the juvenile death penalty. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 13(2), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.13.2.115

Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., & Paradiso, M. A. (2016). Neuroscience : exploring the brain. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Blakemore, S.-J. (2018). Avoiding Social Risk in Adolescence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738144

Brockmole, J. R., & Logie, R. H. (2013). Age-Related Change in Visual Working Memory: A Study of 55,753 Participants Aged 8–75. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00012

Burke, A. S. (2011). Under construction: Brain formation, culpability, and the criminal justice system. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34(6), 381–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.10.001

Carlson, S. M., Koenig, M. A., & Harms, M. B. (2013). Theory of mind. WIREs Cognitive Science, 4(4), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1232

Child Rights International Network [CRIN]. (2018). Minimum ages of criminal responsibility around the world. Retrieved from https://archive.crin.org/en/home/ages.html

Cruz, P. De. (2010). Comparative Law in a Changing World. Oxfordshire: Routledge-Cavendish.

Denno, D. W. (2015). The Myth of the Double- Edged Sword: An Empirical Study of Neuroscience Evidence in Criminal Cases. Boston College Law Review, 56(2).

Drabsch, T. (2022). Age of criminal responsibility. Retrieved from https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/researchpapers/Documents/Age of criminal responsibility - Final.pdf

General Assembly resolution 44/25. (1990). Convention on the Rights of the Child. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/crc.pdf

Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., … Thompson, P. M. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(21), 8174–8179. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402680101

Hartley, C. A., & Somerville, L. H. (2015). The neuroscience of adolescent decision-making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 5, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.09.004

Hutahean, B. (2013). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Anak. Jurnal Yudisial, 6(1), 64–79.

Institute for Criminal Justice Reform [ICJR]. (2015). ICJR : Usia Minimum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Sebaiknya Ditingkatkan. Retrieved from https://icjr.or.id/icjr-usia-minimum-pertanggungjawaban-pidana-anak-sebaiknya-ditingkatkan/

Johnson, S. B., Blum, R. W., & Giedd, J. N. (2009). Adolescent Maturity and the Brain: The Promise and Pitfalls of Neuroscience Research in Adolescent Health Policy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(3), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.05.016

Mills, K. L., Goddings, A.-L., Clasen, L. S., Giedd, J. N., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2014). The Developmental Mismatch in Structural Brain Maturation during Adolescence. Developmental Neuroscience, 36(3–4), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1159/000362328

O’Rourke, S., Whalley, H., Janes, S., MacSweeney, N., Skrenes, A., Crowson, S., … Schwannauer, M. (2020). The Development of Cognitive Emotional Maturity in Adolescents and its Relevance in Judicial Contexts: Literature Review. Edinburgh EH8 9YL: The University of Edinburgh. Retrieved from https://www.scottishsentencingcouncil.org.uk/media/2044/20200219-ssc-cognitive-maturity-literature-review.pdf

Padmanabhan, A., Geier, C. F., Ordaz, S. J., Teslovich, T., & Luna, B. (2011). Developmental changes in brain function underlying the influence of reward processing on inhibitory control. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.06.004

Pamplona, F. (2022). A Guide to Conceptual Analysis Research - MTG. Retrieved from https://mindthegraph.com/blog/conceptual-analysis-research/

Pardo, M. S., & Patterson, D. (2013). Minds, Brains, and Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812134.001.0001

Pillay, A. L. (2015). Deliberating the minimum age of criminal responsibility. South African Journal of Psychology, 45(2), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246315585922

Prasetyo, T. (2012). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Reichelt, A. C. (2016). Adolescent Maturational Transitions in the Prefrontal Cortex and Dopamine Signaling as a Risk Factor for the Development of Obesity and High Fat/High Sugar Diet Induced Cognitive Deficits. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00189

Romeo, R. D. (2013). The Teenage Brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(2), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413475445

Shafi, N. (2009). Neuroscience and Law: The Evidentiary Value of Brain Imaging. Graduate Student Journal of Psychology, 11, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.52214/gsjp.v11i.10841

Shulman, E. P., Smith, A. R., Silva, K., Icenogle, G., Duell, N., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.12.010

Sitepu, R. I. (2022). Peninjauan Kembali Batas Usia Minimum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Yang Terlibat Perdagangan Narkotika. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2(3), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v2i3.90

Soekanto, S. (2010). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Steinberg, L. (2013). The influence of neuroscience on US Supreme Court decisions about adolescents’ criminal culpability. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(7), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3509

Taber-Thomas, B. C., Asp, E. W., Koenigs, M., Sutterer, M., Anderson, S. W., & Tranel, D. (2014). Arrested development: early prefrontal lesions impair the maturation of moral judgement. Brain, 137(4), 1254–1261. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awt377

Taylor, J. S., Harp, J. A., & Elliott, T. (1991). Neuropsychologists and neurolawyers. Neuropsychology, 5(4), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.5.4.293

The Royal Society. (2011). Brain Waves Module 4: Neuroscience and the law. London: The Royal Society.

Tsujimoto, S., & Sawaguchi, T. (2004). Properties of delay-period neuronal activity in the primate prefrontal cortex during memory- and sensory-guided saccade tasks. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19(2), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0953-816X.2003.03130.x

United Nations Children’s Fund [UNICEF]. (2017). The Adolescent Brain: A second window of opportunity. Florence. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/world/adolescent-brain-second-window-opportunity-compendium

Uytun, M. C. (2018). Development Period of Prefrontal Cortex. In Prefrontal Cortex. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78697

Wright, A. (2010). Brain scanning techniques (CT, MRI, fMRI, PET, SPECT, DTI, DOT). Retrieved from https://psicoterapiabilbao.es/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Brain_scanning_techniques.pdf

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang KUHP

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang KUHP

UU Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Pengadilan Anak

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): September

Section

Article

License

Copyright statement
Authors who publish with JURNAL PENEGAKAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

License
This journal is using Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. You are free to:
  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms, which include the following:
  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
  3. ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  4. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)


JPHK is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.