Foot Arch and Plantar Pressure in the Age of 17-21 Years

Arif Wicaksono, Sasanthy Kusumaningtyas, Angela BM Tulaar

Abstract


Research on the plantar segment has not been widely carried out in Indonesia’s population, even though the plantar segment data will be essential in further research and therapy of plantar-related problems. Therefore, this research intends to describe the plantar profile: the foot arch and the plantar pressure difference between the right and left foot. This research applied a cross-sectional study. Subjects were recruited from the Faculty of Medicine students, Universitas Indonesia, class 2012, with inclusion criteria aged 17-21 years and normal gait. Meanwhile, the exclusion criteria consisted of having postural abnormalities, a history of neuromusculoskeletal disorders in the lower limbs, a history of fractures in the spine and legs, a history of surgery on the spine and legs, and refusing to participate in the study. Research subjects stood on a plantar scanner, conducted at the Anatomy Laboratory, the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia. The Mann-Whitney test was then used to analyze the difference in plantar pressure between the right and left foot. The results revealed that a hundred research subjects had a proportion of a low foot arch of 4%, a normal foot arch of 89%, and a high foot arch of 7%. The median right plantar pressure was 273.5 KPa, while the median left plantar pressure was 253.5 KPa. The Mann-Whitney test showed a p-value of 0.954 for the pressure difference between right and left foot. There was no plantar pressure difference between the right and left foot.


Keywords


foot arch; plantar pressure; normal gait

Full Text:

PDF

References


Menz HB, Dufour AB, Riskowski JL, Hillstrom HJ, Hannan MT. Foot Posture, Foot Function and Low Back Pain: The Framingham Foot Study. Rheumatol (United Kingdom). 2013; 52(12): 2275–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket298

Rogati G, Leardini A, Ortolani M, Caravaggi P. Validation of a Novel Kinect-based Device for 3D Scanning of the Foot Plantar Surface in Weight-bearing. J Foot Ankle Res. 2019; 12(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-019-0357-7

Nilsson MK, Friis R, Michaelsen MS, Jakobsen PA, Nielsen RO. Classification of the Height and Flexibility of the Medial Longitudinal Arch of the Foot. J Foot Ankle Res [Internet]. 2012; 5(1): 3. 1 https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-5-3

Buldt AK, Forghany S, Landorf KB, Murley GS, Levinger P, Menz HB. Centre of Pressure Characteristics in Normal, Planus and Cavus Feet. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018; 11(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0245-6

Wong CK, Weil R, de Boer E. Standardizing Foot-type Classification Using Arch Index Values. Physiother Canada. 2012; 64(3): 280–3. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2011-40

Hillstrom HJ, Song J, Kraszewski AP, Hafer JF, Mootanah R, Dufour A, et al. Foot Type Biomechanics Part 1: Structure and Function of the Asymptomatic Foot. Gait Posture. 2013; 37(5): 445–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.09.007

Sanghan S, Chatpun S, Leelasamran W. Plantar Pressure Difference: Decision Criteria of Motor Relearning Feedback Insole for Hemiplegic Patients. 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Technology. Singapore: IACSIT Press; 2012. 29–33.

McKeon PO, Hertel J, Bramble D, Davis I. The Foot Core System: A New Paradigm for Understanding Intrinsic Foot Muscle Function. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49(5): 290. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092690

Wu SC, Jensen JL, Weber AK, Robinson DE, Armstrong DG. Use of Pressure off Loading Devices in Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Do We Practice What We Preach? Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(11): 2118–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-0771

Roth S, Roth A, Jotanovic Z, Madarevic T. Navicular Index for Differentiation of Flat Foot from Normal Foot. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(6): 1107–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1885-6

Roy H, Bhattacharya K, Deb S, Ray K. Arch Index: An Easier Approach for Arch Height (A Regression Analysis). Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2012; 5(2): 10.

Pohl MB, Farr L. A Comparison of Foot Arch Measurement Reliability Using Both Digital Photography and Calliper Methods. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010; 3(1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-3-14

Cobb SC, James CR, Hjertstedt M, Kruk J. A Digital Photographic Measurement Method for Quantifying Foot Posture: Validity, Reliability, and Descriptive Data. J Athl Train. 2011; 46(1): 20–30. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-46.1.20

Carroll M, Annabell ME, Rome K. Reliability of Capturing Foot Parameters Using Digital Scanning and the Neutral Suspension Casting Technique. J Foot Ankle Res [Internet]. 2011; 4(1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-4-9

Chun S, Kong S, Mun KR, Kim J. A Foot-arch Parameter Measurement System Using a Rgb-D Camera. Sensors (Switzerland). 2017;17(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081796

Zheng T, Yu Z, Wang J, Lu G. A New Automatic Foot Arch Index Measurement Method Based on a Flexible Membrane Pressure Sensor. Sensors (Switzerland). 2020; 20(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102892

Stanković K, Booth BG, Danckaers F, Burg F, Vermaelen P, Duerinck S, et al. Three-dimensional Quantitative Analysis of Healthy Foot Shape: a Proof of Concept Study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2018; 11(1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-018-0251-8

Xiong S, Goonetilleke R, Witana C, Lee Au E. Modelling Foot Height and Foot Shape-related Dimensions. Ergonomics. 2008; 51(8): 1272–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130801996147

Abdurrahman IR, Tahid A, Fathurachman. Foot Anthropometric Profile of High School Students in Bandung. Althea Med J. 2018; 5(2): 93–7. https://doi.org/10.15850/amj.v5n2.1418

Lutfie SH. Hubungan antara Derajat Lengkung Kaki dengan Tingkat Kemampuan Endurans pada Calon Jemaah Haji. Cermin Dunia Kedokteran. 2010; 178: 343–6.

Hamill J, Knutzen KM, Derrick TR. Biomechanical Basis of Human Movement. 4th ed. Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2013. 506.

Houglum PA, Bertoti DB. Brunnstrom’s Clinical Kinesiology. 6th ed. Brunnstrom’s Clinical Kinesiology. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 2012. 745.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/mmjkk.v21i2.10799

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


      

Editorial Office:
Journal Room, G1 (Biomedic) Building, Ground Floor, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 
Jalan Lingkar Selatan (Brawijaya), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 231)
WA : +62 811-2650-303
Website: http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/mm 
E-mail: mmjkk@umy.university

Creative Commons License
Mutiara Medika: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. View My Stats