The Comparation of Building Information Modelling and Conventional Method in Planning Multi-storey Building Structure

Authors

  • Utami Dewi Arman Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Putra Indonesia YPTK, Padang
  • Maiyozzi Chairi Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Putra Indonesia YPTK, Padang
  • Afrilda Sari Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Putra Indonesia YPTK, Padang
  • Lesti Febria Zolla Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Putra Indonesia YPTK, Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/st.v28i1.24194

Keywords:

BIM, conventional method, comparation, time, budget

Abstract

The construction sector in Indonesia is experiencing rapid development so that Architectural, Engineering Construction (AEC) companies compete with each other and adopt technology that significantly increases the efficiency and effectiveness of construction project implementation. This study is aimed to compare the implementation of BIM with conventional method based on the duration of process, the number of personnel needed and the budget of implementation. Research data are data and information obtained through questionnaires and interviews with 3 (three) AEC companies in Padang city, either implementing BIM or conventional method. Based on the result, it was concluded that conventional method requires longer time in planning structural work compared to BIM method with reducing time 76.4% in the design process, 33.3% in the number of personnel and 16.11% in salary costs compared with BIM method. By efficiency and sustainable benefits considered, it is necessary to encourage AEC companies in Padang city to implement BIM method in their business processes.

References

Berlian, P.C.A., Putranto. R., Hidayat, A., Nugroho, H.(2016). Perbandingan efisiensi waktu, biaya, dan sumber daya manusia antara metode Building Information Modelling (BIM) dan conventional (Studi kasus: Perencanaan gedung 20 lantai). Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, 5 (2). 220-229. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jkts/article/view/12641

Fitriani, H., Budiarto, A., Saheed, A. and Idris, Y. (2019). Implementing BIM in architecture, engineering and construction companies: Perceived benefits and barriers among local contractors in Palembang, Indonesia. International Journal of Construction Supply Chain Management, 9(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.14424/ijcscm901019-20-34

Fuad, S & Suroso, A. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat penerapan BIM (Building Information Modelling) 4D di BUMN Konstruksi. Jurnal Konstruksia, 14 (1). 79-87. https://doi.org/10.24853/jk.14.1.79-87

Gunawan, M., Kartika, N. (2021). Penerapan Building Information Modelling (BIM) Pada Proyek Pasar Soreang Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Student Teknik Sipil. 3(2). 407-420. https://doi.org/10.37150/jsts.v3i2.1655

Megawati, W.B.,Purwanto, H. (2022). Perbandingan BIM Dengan Conventional Pada Hasil BQ Proyek X. Journal of Applied Civil Engineering and Insfrastructure Technology, 3 (2). 01-09. https://doi.org/10.52158/jaceit.v3i2.247

Mieslenna, C.S & Wibowo, A. (2019). Mengeksplorasi penerapan Building Information Modelling (BIM) pada industri konstruksi Indonesia dari perspektif pengguna. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pekerjaan Umum, 11(1), 44-58.

Muhsin, A., Prawiradinata., R. Y. S., Razaq, Y. N., Novianti. (2021). Perbandingan antara alur kerja BIM dengan CAD pada proses renovasi rumah tinggal. Jurnal Arsitektur Terracotta, 2(3), 194-204. https://doi.org/10.26760/terracotta.v2i3.4899

Nugrahini, F. C., & Permana, T. A. (2020). Building Information Modelling (BIM) dalam tahapan desain dan konstruksi di Indonesia, peluang dan tantangan: Studi kasus perluasan T1 Bandara Juanda Surabaya. AGREGAT, 5(2). 459-467. https://doi.org/10.30651/ag.v5i2.6588

Pantiga, J., Soekiman, A. (2021). Kajian implementasi Building Information Modelling (BIM) di dunia konstruksi. REKAYASA SIPIL,15 (2). 104-110.

Pratama, A & Marzuki, P.F. (2023). Kajian implementasi BIM (Building Information Modeling) di Indonesia berdasarkan perspektif pelaksana konstruksi (Studi kasus: Proyek kontraktor BUMN). JURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL, 30(2). 277-296. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2023.30.2.16

Rahmani, I., Herumanta, B. (2020). Comparison of estimation of reinforced concrete structure working costs based on the concept of Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and Building Information Modelling (BIM) in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 1(10), 1237-1244. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v1i10.188

Rizky Hutama, H & Sekarsari, J. (2019). Analisa faktor penghambat penerapan Building Information Modelling dalam proyek konstruksi. Jurnal Infrastruktur, 4(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.35814/infrastruktur.v4i1.716

Rizqy, R. M., Martina, N., & Purwanto, H. L. (2021). Perbandingan metode konvensional dengan BIM terhadap efisiensi biaya, mutu, waktu. Ceylon Medical Journal, 3(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.32722/cmj.v3i1.3506

Suwarni, A., & Anondho, B. (2021). Perbandingan perhitungan volume kolom beton antara Building Information Modeling (BIM) dengan metode konvensional. JUTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 6(2). 75-83.

Tama, Y. P. D, & Renaningsih, R. (2023). Perbandingan perhitungan volume dan estimasi biaya beton pile cap RS Kasih Ibu Surakarta antara metode Building Information Modelling (BIM) dengan conventional. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Muhammadiyah. Surakarta. 705-710. https://proceedings.ums.ac.id/sipil/article/view/2784

Downloads

Published

2025-05-19

How to Cite

Arman, U. D., Chairi, M., Sari, A., & Zolla, L. F. (2025). The Comparation of Building Information Modelling and Conventional Method in Planning Multi-storey Building Structure. Semesta Teknika, 28(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.18196/st.v28i1.24194

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 1 (2025): MEI

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Utami Dewi Arman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Semesta Teknika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).