Analisis Prioritas Rehabilitasi Bendung:Studi Kasus Bendung Cokrobedog, Gamping, Pendowo dan Pijenan di Kali Bedog
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/st.211206Keywords:
The damage of weirs, Rehabilitation priority of weirs, MADMAbstract
The government provided Special Allocation Budget via APBD for rehabilitation activities in order to increase the function and physical condition of the weirs. The rehabilitation performances must be run stage by stage due to the limitation of allocation budget, however, it would be continual. Hence the analysis of rehabilitation priority was needed. The case study of this research was the determination of rehabilitation priority towards the weirs of Cokrobedog, Gamping, Pendowo, and Pijenan. These four weirs were at Kali Bedog, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.The method used for priority analysis in this research was Multi Attribute Decision Making method (MADM), consisted of AHP, ELECTRE, SAW, TOPSIS, and WP. The criterias used were the infrastructure conditions, the availability of water, and the command areas by the percentage weighting of assessment criteria at 57 , 29 and 14. The damage percentage of Gamping was 44.66%, ranked as serious damage. The damage percentage of Cokrobedog, Pendowo and Pijenan for each of it was 36.11%, 33.57% and 30.30%, ranked as average damage. The order of priority rehabilitation of dams tend not begin with the largest command area. TOPSIS method is a method most appropriate MADM applied in the prioritization of rehabilitation because it has a significantly different end value.
References
BNPB, (2008). Peraturan Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana No. 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Pedoman Rehabilitasi dan rekonstruksi Pasca Bencana, Jakarta.
Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, (2015). Peraturan Menteri PUPR No. 03/PRT/M/2015 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penggunaan Dana Alokasi Khusus Bidang Infrastruktur. Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air, Jakarta.
Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, (2015). Peraturan Menteri PUPR No. 12/PRT/M/2015 Tentang Eksploitasi dan Pemeliharaan Jaringan irigasi. Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air, Jakarta.
Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, (2015). Peraturan Menteri PUPR No. 23/PRT/M/2015 Tentang Pengelolaan Aset irigasi. Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air, Jakarta.
Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air. (2011). Standar Perencanaan Irigasi KP 01. Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air, Jakarta.
Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air. (2011). Standar Perencanaan Irigasi KP 02. Direktorat Jenderal Sumber Daya Air, Jakarta.
Fatchan Nurrochmad, (2008). Analysis of Rehabilitation Priority of Irrigation Infrastructure, Dinamika Teknik Sipil Vol.8, No.1, Januari 2008, Yogyakarta.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, (1974). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tentang Pengairan, Jakarta.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, (1982). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tentang Tata Pengaturan Air, Jakarta.
Sri Kusumadewi, Hartati, S., Harjoko, A., Wardoyo, R., (2006). Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM), Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta.
Yunita Aprilina, (2013). Analisis Prioritas Operasi dan pemeliharaan serta Rehabilitasi Daerah Irigasi (Studi Kasus 8 daerah Irigasi Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta), Tesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Semesta Teknika is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).