Email this article Collaborative Governance’s Risk Management (Case Study: Implementation of Tobacco Control Policy in Kulonprogo and Pekalongan City)
Abstract
This article explored collaborative governance risk management on implementing tobacco control policy in Kulonprogo Regency and Pekalongan City. The research methods used qualitative methods based on primary and secondary data. The authors collected the primary data through interviews with some actors. In contrast, the secondary data comprised online mass media and previous research on relevant topics. This article also uses the tool Nvivo12 Plus to help with data processing. The results showed that the collaborative governance of Kulonprogo Regency and Pekalongan City had some risks in their collaboration. Kulonprogo Regency could resolve those risks through decision-making to achieve the integrated mechanism. This step is easy to implicate because the actor has high cooperation to solve their problem through a joint decision. While the risk collaboration of Pekalongan city could not be solved properly cause of the lack the mechanical integration of the actor in that collaboration. The actor has different principles and impacts on a joint decision to achieve an integrated mechanism when solving the problems.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andrew, S. A., & Carr, J. B. (2013). Mitigating Uncertainty and Risk in Planning for Regional Preparedness: The Role of Bonding and Bridging Relationships. Urban Studies, 50(4), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012455718
Ansell, Chris, & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Ansell, Chris, & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030
Ansell, Christopher, Doberstein, C., Henderson, H., Siddiki, S., & ‘t Hart, P. (2020). Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: a mixed methods approach. Policy and Society, 39(4), 570–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726
Ansell, Christopher, Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2017). Improving policy implementation through collaborative policymaking. Policy and Politics, 45(3), 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14972799760260
Baird, J., Plummer, R., Schultz, L., Armitage, D., & Bodin, Ö. (2019). How Does Socio-institutional Diversity Affect Collaborative Governance of Social–Ecological Systems in Practice? Environmental Management, 63(2), 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1123-5
Baldwin, E., Chen, T., & Cole, D. (2019). Institutional analysis for new public governance scholars. Public Management Review, 21(6), 890–917. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1538427
Barrutia, J. M., & Echebarria, C. (2019). Drivers of exploitative and explorative innovation in a collaborative public-sector context. Public Management Review, 21(3), 446–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1500630
Batory, A., & Svensson, S. (2020). Regulating Collaboration: The Legal Framework of Collaborative Governance in Ten European Countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(9), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1658771
Bell, E., & Scott, T. A. (2020). Common institutional design, divergent results: A comparative case study of collaborative governance platforms for regional water planning. Environmental Science and Policy, 111, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.04.015
Berardo, R., Fischer, M., & Hamilton, M. (2020). Collaborative Governance and the Challenges of Network-Based Research. American Review of Public Administration. 50(8), 898–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020927792
Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114
Bodin, Ö., Sandström, A., & Crona, B. (2017). Collaborative Networks for Effective Ecosystem-Based Management: A Set of Working Hypotheses. Policy Studies Journal, 45(2), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12146
Bonomi, S., Sarti, D., & Torre, T. (2020). Creating a collaborative network for welfare services in public sector. A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Business Research, 112, 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.050
Bradford, N. (2016). Ideas and Collaborative Governance: A Discursive Localism Approach. Urban Affairs Review, 52(5), 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415610011
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Seo, D. (2020). Using a design approach to create collaborative governance. Policy and Politics, 48(1), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15613696433190
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
Cain, B. E., Gerber, E. R., & Hui, I. (2020). Public Perceptions of Collaborative Governance in Transportation Policy. Political Research Quarterly. 74(4), 899–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920943954
Calanni, J. C., Siddiki, S. N., Weible, C. M., & Leach, W. D. (2015). Explaining Coordination in Collaborative Partnerships and Clarifying the Scope of the Belief Homophily Hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 901–927. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut080
Carr, J. B., Hawkins, C. V., & Westberg, D. E. (2017). An Exploration of Collaboration Risk in Joint Ventures: Perceptions of Risk by Local Economic Development Officials. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(3), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417710325
Feiock, R. C. (2013). Print Read 22 .Pdf. 41(3), 397–425.
Gerber, E. R., Henry, A. D., & Lubell, M. (2013). Political homophily and collaboration in regional planning networks. American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 598–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12011
Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research, 280, 112516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
Hansen, K., Mullin, M., & Riggs, E. K. (2020). Collaboration Risk and the Choice to Consolidate Local Government Services. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(3), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz017
Hawkins, C. V., Hu, Q., & Feiock, R. C. (2016). Self-Organizing Governance of Local Economic Development: Informal Policy Networks and Regional Institutions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(5), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12280
Herranz, J. (2008). The multisectoral trilemma of network management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum004
Jovita, H. D., Nurmandi, A., Mutiarin, D., & Purnomo, E. P. (2018). Why does network governance fail in managing post-disaster conditions in the Philippines? Jamba: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v10i1.585
Kathrin, B. (2019). Collaborative governance in the making: Implementation of a new forest management regime in an old-growth conflict region of British Columbia, Canada. Land Use Policy, 86, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.019
Kim, S. (2016). The workings of collaborative governance: Evaluating collaborative community-building initiatives in Korea. Urban Studies, 53(16), 3547–3565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015613235
Kim, S. Y., Swann, W. L., Weible, C. M., Bolognesi, T., Krause, R. M., Park, A. Y. S., Tang, T., Maletsky, K., & Feiock, R. C. (2020). Updating the Institutional Collective Action Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 50(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12392
Koebele, E. A. (2020). Cross-Coalition Coordination in Collaborative Environmental Governance Processes. Policy Studies Journal, 48(3), 727–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12306
Lahat, L. (2020). New Institutionalism in Public Policy. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3879-1
Lee, Y. (2016). From Competition to Collaboration: Intergovernmental Economic Development Policy Networks. Local Government Studies, 42(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2015.1096267
Lefèvre, H., Moro, M. R., & Lachal, J. (2019). Research in adolescent healthcare: The value of qualitative methods. Archives de Pédiatrie, 26(7), 426–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2019.09.012
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. In Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Arizona State University. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.25.33.s40
Nair, A., Blome, C., Choi, T. Y., & Lee, G. (2018). Re-visiting collaborative behavior in supply networks – structural embeddedness and the influence of contextual changes and sanctions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 24(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2017.11.006
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (1995). A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393698
Raitio, K. (2012). New institutional approach to collaborative forest planning on public land: Methods for analysis and lessons for policy. Land Use Policy, 29(2), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.001
Ran, B., & Qi, H. (2018). The Entangled Twins: Power and Trust in Collaborative Governance. Administration & Society, 51(2), 607–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399718801000
Shrestha, M. K. (2018). Network Structure, Strength of Relationships, and Communities’ Success in Project Implementation. Public Administration Review, 78(2), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12787
Song, M., Jung, K., Ki, N., & Feiock, R. C. (2020). Testing structural and relational embeddedness in collaboration risk. Rationality and Society, 32(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463120902279
Terman, J. N., Feiock, R. C., & Youm, J. (2020). When Collaboration Is Risky Business: The Influence of Collaboration Risks on Formal and Informal Collaboration. American Review of Public Administration, 50(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019867421
Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science announces. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 14(1), NP-NP. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188637801400102
Weymouth, Robert, Hartz-, Karp, Janette, Weymouth, R., & Hartz-Karp, J. (2015). Deliberative Collaborative Governance as a Democratic Reform to Resolve Wicked Problems and Improve Trust. Journal of Economic and Social Policy, 17(1), 62–95. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.243499798817889
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v10i2.17304
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Governance and Public Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Office:
Master of Government Affairs and Administration (MIP)
Postgraduate Building 2nd Floor UMY
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 173)
Jl. Brawijaya, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.