The market reactions for deferred compliance of IAS 41: an analysis of the agriculture sector in Indonesia

Ersa Tri Wahyuni, Sandra Trianadewi Lucin, Zubir Azhar

Abstract


Research aims: This study aims to investigate the market reaction of post-IAS 41 implementation in Indonesia. IAS 41 Agriculture requires companies to measure biological assets at fair value, which will increase asset values and profit in the first year of its implementation. The increase in the asset values can have a favorable impact on companies’ share prices as fair value was not applied in Indonesia prior to the adoption of IAS 41. In addition, this study analyzes the disclosure compliance of IAS 41 in the interim reports during the implementation year.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This study used non-parametric statistics, precisely the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and content analysis of financial statement disclosure about IAS 41 Agriculture. The sample of the study comprised 27 Indonesian companies with agriculture assets during the first year of the implementation of IAS 41.
Research findings: The results of this study suggest no significant difference in market abnormal return after the first annual financial statements post-IAS 41 implementation were released in the first quarter of 2018. The results also indicate that at least 50% of the 27 sample companies did not use fair value for their biological assets in their first quarter of interim report during the implementation year. The use of fair value was only observed in the last quarter of 2018, as most companies made an effort to apply fair value. The late implementation of fair value in IAS 41 may explain the insignificance of the market's abnormal return reaction in the first quarter of the adoption year when the financial reports were released.
Practitioner/Policy implication: The adoption of the new standard requires companies to comply with it right in the first quarter of the implementation year. The capital market regulator should impose stricter requirements for listed companies to apply the new standard starting with the first quarter of financial reports.
Research limitation/Implication: The limitations of this study concern the observation period used for calculating abnormal returns, which did not conclude a ‘pure’ market reaction, and the sample of this research was limited to three industries: agriculture, basic chemicals, and consumer goods.


Keywords


IAS 41; Event Study; Disclosure Content Analysis; Agriculture Assets; Market Reaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abduh, M. (2023). Indonesia Agricultural Transformation: How Far? Where Would It Go?. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 7(1), 48-82.

Amelda, R. N., & Kristina, U. V. (2021). Market Efficiency of Exchange Rate of Bitcoin with Dollar and Rupiah of Foreign Exchange Markets: Weak and Semi-Strong Form Test. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 21(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.25124/jmi.v21i2.3667

Armitage, S. (1995). Event Study Methods and Evidence on Their Performance. Journal of Economic Surveys, 9(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1995.tb00109.x

Batista, A. R. de A., Maia, U., & Romero, A. (2018). Stock market under the 2016 Brazilian presidential impeachment: A test in the semi-strong form of the efficient market hypothesis. Revista Contabilidade e Financas, 29(78), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201805560

Fama, E. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of the Theory. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.

Gao, P., Jiang, X., & Zhang, G. (2019). Firm value and market liquidity around the adoption of common accounting standards. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 68(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.11.001

Hsu, A. W., Liu, S., Sami, H., & Wan, T. H. (2019). IAS 41 and stock price informativeness. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26(1–2), 64–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2019.1545928

Landsman, W. R., Maydew, E. L., & Thornock, J. R. (2012). The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory adoption of IFRS. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.04.002

Nelmida. (2020). Is Indonesia Stock Exchange Semi-Strong Form Efficiency? Jurnal Manajemen, 24(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.24912/jm.v24i2.653

Ningrum, M. L., & Risman, A. (2022). Semi-Strong Efficient Market Hypothesis in Dividend Announcements at Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 2(33), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.35678/2539-5645.2(33).2022.23-34

OJK. (2017). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 75 /POJK.04/2017 Tentang Tanggung Jawab Direksi Atas Laporan Keuangan. https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/Tanggung-Jawab-Direksi-atas-Laporan-Keuangan.aspx

Rachmawati, Y., Oktariyani, A., & Ermina. (2019). Implementasi Perlakuan Akuntansi Aset Biologis Berbasis PSAK 69 yang Berlaku Efektif 1 Januari 2018 Pada Perusahaan Perkebunan (Studi Kasus PT.PP London Sumatera Indonesia,Tbk). Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 14(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.30630/jam.v14i2.50

Sedláček, J. (2010). The methods of valuation in agricultural accounting. Agricultural Economics, 56(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.17221/1487-agricecon

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach (8th edition). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Sellhorn, T., & Stier, C. (2019). Fair Value Measurement for Long-Lived Operating Assets: Research Evidence. European Accounting Review, 28(3), 573–603. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16019

Setiono, B., & Strong, N. (1998). Predicting stock returns using financial statement information. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 25(5–6), 631–657. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5957.00205

Sun, Y., Steelyana, E., & Cahyadi, Y. (2014). Market Reaction to the Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standard in Indonesia. Binus Business Review, 5(2), 466. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v5i2.1005

Yasar, B., Martin, T., & Kiessling, T. (2020). An empirical test of signalling theory. Management Research Review, 43(11), 1309–1335. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-08-2019-0338




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v25i2.20019

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id

Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View My Stats