Design of government agency’s performance accountability system best practice implementation: Indonesia experience

Fatih Henggar Panggalih, Indra Bastian

Abstract


Research aims: This study aims to explain the performance accountability system best practice implementation of Yogyakarta Special Region’s (Yogyakarta) Local Government through a valid and reliable design that is ready to be adopted and used as a role model by other local governments.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research used a qualitative method with a case study approach to reach the research objective. Research data was collected using in-depth interviews and documentation techniques.
Research findings: This study succeeds in realizing a design by providing an applicable template as a recommendation tool compiled from seventeen items of success measures that are the performance accountability system’s best practices at the Yogyakarta Local Government. This study becomes more complex because it has been equipped with simulations of template filling out as well as a comparative analysis of the performance accountability system’s implementation between the Yogyakarta Local Government and the Central Java Local Government. The results of filling out the template for the Central Java Local Government revealed that 88% of the success measures have been applied, and another 12% have not.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: This study provides an academic contribution as a reference related to the performance accountability system of government agencies.
Practitioner/Policy implication: This study also provides a practical contribution to other local governments regarding the application of the performance accountability system’s best practices at the Yogyakarta Local Government through the design of the performance accountability system’s best practices that can be adopted and used as a role model in strengthening the performance accountability system.
Research limitation/Implication: This study has limitations, namely that the researcher was unable to conduct interviews with the Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform due to communication problems, which prevented the interview process from being carried out.


Keywords


Design; Local Government; Performance Accountability System; Role Model; Template

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, R., Pilcher, R. A., & Perrin, B. (2015). Implementing performance measurement systems: Indonesian local government under pressure. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0013

Aucoin, P., & Heintzman, R. (2000). The dialectics of accountability for performance in public management reform. International review of administrative sciences, 66(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852300661005

Bappeda Yogyakarta. (2019). Laporan Keterangan Pertanggung Jawaban LKPJ Gubernur DIY. http://bappeda.jogjaprov.go.id/download/index?id_kategori=78

Baskoro, F. R., & Akbar, R. (2018). Mengevaluasi sistem pengukuran kinerja di instansi publik: Studi pada Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah. Jati: Jurnal Akuntansi Terapan Indonesia, 1(2), 52-63. https://doi.org/10.18196/jati.010206

Bovens Mark. (2005). The concepts of public accountability, in The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Ewan Ferlie, Lawrence E. Lynne and Christopher Pollitt.

Brandsma, G. J., & Schillemans, T. (2013). The Accountability Cube: Measuring Accountability. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 953–975. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus034

Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(3–4), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00013-8

Cresswell. (2014). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Edition). Sage Publishing.

Hennink. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications.

Humas Yogyakarta. (2023). DIY Raih Predikat SAKIP AA ke—6 Kalinya, Masih Satu-satunya Di Indonesia. https://jogjaprov.go.id/berita/diy-raih-predikat-sakip-aa-ke-6-kalinya-masih-satu-satunya-di-indonesia

Inanga E. (1991). Accounting and accountability (inaugural lecture series). Ibadan.

Iyoha, F. O., & Oyerinde, D. (2010). Accounting infrastructure and accountability in the management of public expenditure in developing countries: A focus on Nigeria. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(5), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2009.06.002

John Gerring. (2006). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press.

Jurnali, T. & A.K. Nabiha. (2015). Performance Management System for Local Government: The Indonesian Experience. Global Business Review, 16(3), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915569923

Mahmudi. (2010). Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. UPP STIM YKPN.

Mardiarto, T., & Halim, A. (2018). Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah: Best Practice pada Pemerintah Daerah DIY. ABIS: Accounting and Business Information Systems Journal, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v6i4.58810

Mardiasmo. (2005). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Andi Offset.

Ministry of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform. (2019a). Menteri Tjahjo Pastikan Penerapan SAKIP di DIY Terus Berdampak. http://rbkunwas.menpan.go.id/berita/berita-terkini/497-menteri-tjahjo-sakip-diy

Ministry of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform. (2019b). Laporan Kinerja (LAKIP). https://www.menpan.go.id/site/publikasi/unduh-dokumen-2/akuntabilitas-kinerja/laporan-kinerja/file/6267-laporan-kinerja-lakip-2019

Ministry of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform. (2020). Materi Penyerahan Hasil Evaluasi Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Provinsi/Kabupaten/Kota Wilayah III – Yogyakarta, 24 Februari 2020. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/info-terkini/materi-penyerahan-hasil-evaluasi-akuntabilitas-kinerja-instansi-pemerintah-provinsi-kabupaten-kota-wilayah-iii-yogyakarta-24-februari-2020

Ministry of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform. (2024). Kementerian PANRB Pandu Akselerasi Reformasi Birokrasi pada 145 Pemerintah Daerah. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/kementerian-panrb-pandu-akselerasi-reformasi-birokrasi-pada-145-pemerintah-daerah

Palenga, F. H. (2017). Evaluasi Penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Studi Pada Biro Organisasi Sekretariat Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah). Katalogis, 5(1).

Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia.

Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negaradan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 12 Tahun 2015 tentang Pedoman Evaluasi atas Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi

Roberts, J., & Scapens, R. (1985). Accounting systems and systems of accountability—Understanding accounting practices in their organisational contexts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(85)90005-4

Ruscitasari, Z. (2019). Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah. Akmenika: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.31316/akmenika.v16i2.378

Sabaryanto, T. (2017). Evaluasi Implementasi SAKIP Organisasi Publik (Studi pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Kebumen). ABIS: Accounting and Business Information Systems Journal, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v4i2.59335

Sofyani, H., & Akbar, R. (2013). Hubungan Faktor Internal Institusi dan Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) di Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 10(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2013.10

Sofyani, H., & Akbar, R. (2015). Hubungan karakteristik pegawai pemerintah daerah dan implementasi sistem pengukuran kinerja: Perspektif ismorfisma institusional. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 19(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol19.iss2.art6

Syachbrani, W., & Akbar, R. (2013). Faktor-faktor teknis dan keorganisasian yang memengaruhi pengembangan sistem pengukuran kinerja pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v3i2.2112

Syulfa. (2016). Evaluasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah: Studi pada Kabupaten Bangka Tengah. Thesis. Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/106448




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v25i2.20021

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id

Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View My Stats