ESG and firm performance: The role of digitalization

Rizky Eriandani, Wahyu Agus Winarno

Abstract


Research aims: This research aims to examine the impact of social, environmental, and governance (ESG) responsibilities on firm performance – books and markets. It also analyzes the role of digitalization in the relationship between ESG and firm performance.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The population in this study was all companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2017-2021. The sampling technique used purposive sampling with a total sample of 347 firm-years. Testing hypotheses moderated regression analysis and subgroup analysis.
Research findings: Empirical findings demonstrated that ESG responsibilities could improve company performance, both book performance and market performance. On the contrary, digitization could not boost the company's performance. Moreover, digitalization was unable to moderate the relationship between the two. However, when the samples were separated based on digitization variables, the results revealed that ESG had a positive impact on performance only in companies that adopted digital technology.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: In addition to enriching literature related to agency and stakeholder theory, this research reinforces empirical evidence of the role of ESG in increasing the value of the company. The results also highlight digital adoption to support environmentally and socially responsible activities. Nevertheless, the impact of digitization on company performance has not been proven. This research contributes to the literature about ESG and digitalization that imply corporate value creation.
Practitioner/Policy implication: This research contributes to corporate management to enhance social and environmental responsibility, as well as prompt adoption of digital technology.
Research limitation/Implication: This research has some limitations. First, the sample was limited because not all companies in Indonesia had ESG scores in Bloomberg. Second, the measurement of digitalization on the sub-sample only used a dummy and did not differentiate the type of digitization that the company adopted.


Keywords


ESG; Digitalization; Book Performance; Market Performance; Firm Value

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, M. U., & Murray, J. (2019). Understanding the connect between digitalisation, sustainability and performance of an organisation. International Journal of Business Excellence, 17(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2019.096909

Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043

Anastasiadou, E., Röndell, J., Berglind, M., & Ekman, P. (2023). Identifying factors needed for business actor engagement in sustainable development goal (SDG) initiatives. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 38(13), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2022-0156

Atan, R., Alam, M. M., Said, J., & Zamri, M. (2018). The impacts of environmental, social, and governance factors on firm performance: Panel study of Malaysian companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 29(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2017-0033

Behl, A., Kumari, P. S. R., Makhija, H., & Sharma, D. (2022). Exploring the relationship of ESG score and firm value using cross-lagged panel analyses: Case of the Indian energy sector. Annals of Operations Research, 313(1), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04189-8

Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676–707. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094913

Bhaskaran, R. K., Ting, I. W. K., Sukumaran, S. K., & Sumod, S. D. (2020). Environmental, social and governance initiatives and wealth creation for firms: An empirical examination. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(5), 710–729. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3131

Bogoviz, A. V, Osipov, V. S., Chistyakova, M. K., & Borisov, M. Y. (2019). Comparative analysis of formation of industry 4.0 in developed and developing countries. Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94310-7_15

Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., & de Reuver, M. (2019). Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommunications Policy, 43(9), 101828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101828

Brenner, B. (2018). Transformative sustainable business models in the light of the digital imperative—A global business economics perspective. Sustainability, 10(12), 4428. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124428

Castro, G. D. R., Fernandez, M. C. G., & Colsa, A. U. (2021). Unleashing the convergence amid digitalization and sustainability towards pursuing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A holistic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 122204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122204

Chairani, C., & Siregar, S. V. (2021). The effect of enterprise risk management on financial performance and firm value: the role of environmental, social and governance performance. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-09-2019-0549

Chauhan, C., Singh, A., & Luthra, S. (2021). Barriers to industry 4.0 adoption and its performance implications: An empirical investigation of emerging economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124809

Dalal, K. K., & Thaker, N. (2019). ESG and corporate financial performance: A panel study of Indian companies. IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 18(1), 44–59.

Dam, L., & Scholtens, B. (2015). Toward a theory of responsible investing: On the economic foundations of corporate social responsibility. Resource and Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2015.04.008

De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., & Bartlett, M. (2020). Does good ESG lead to better financial performances by firms? Machine learning and logistic regression models of public enterprises in Europe. Sustainability, 12(13), 5317. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135317

Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Pezzi, A., & Kalisz, D. E. (2021). The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 123, 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042

Dkhili, H. (2023). Does environmental, social and governance (ESG) affect market performance? The moderating role of competitive advantage. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-10-2022-0149

Drnevich, P. L., & Croson, D. C. (2013). Information technology and business-level strategy: Toward an integrated theoretical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 483–509.

Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w

Eriandani, R., & Winarno, W. A. (2021). Corporate social activities and adjusted firm performance: An SOE’s context. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 20(2), 329-343.

Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.04.028

Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global finance journal, 38, 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001

Feldman, E. R. (2016). Corporate spinoffs and analysts’ coverage decisions: The implications for diversified firms. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1196–1219. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2397

Ferreira, J. J. M., Fernandes, C. I., & Ferreira, F. A. F. (2019). To be or not to be digital, that is the question: Firm innovation and performance. Journal of Business Research, 101, 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.013

Folger-Laronde, Z., Pashang, S., Feor, L., & ElAlfy, A. (2022). ESG ratings and financial performance of exchange-traded funds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(2), 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1782814

Forcadell, F. J., Aracil, E., & Ubeda, F. (2020). Using reputation for corporate sustainability to tackle banks digitalization challenges. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2181–2193. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2494

Garcia, A. S., & Orsato, R. J. (2020). Testing the institutional difference hypothesis: A study about environmental, social, governance, and financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3261–3272. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2570

Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory Social Responsibility Corporate Theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34

Giannopoulos, G., Kihle Fagernes, R. V., Elmarzouky, M., & Afzal Hossain, K. A. B. M. (2022). The ESG disclosure and the financial performance of Norwegian listed firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(6), 237. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15060237

Gouvea, R., Kapelianis, D., & Kassicieh, S. (2018). Assessing the nexus of sustainability and information & communications technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 130, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.023

Gunasekaran, A., Marri, H. B., McGaughey, R. E., & Nebhwani, M. D. (2002). E-commerce and its impact on operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 75(1–2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00191-8

Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2003). The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.9416161

Hossnofsky, V., & Junge, S. (2019). Does the market reward digitalization efforts? Evidence from securities analysts’ investment recommendations. Journal of Business Economics, 89(8–9), 965–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-019-00949-y

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Corporate sustainability: a strategy?. Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper, (19-065). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312191

Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory : A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9507312924

Kim, E.-H., & Lyon, T. P. (2015). Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organization Science, 26(3), 705–723. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0949

Kiron, D., & Unruh, G. (2018). The convergence of digitalization and sustainability. MIT Sloan Management Review, 17.

Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2018). Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0254

Lev, B., Petrovits, C., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.810

Lopez-de-Silanes, F., McCahery, J. A., & Pudschedl, P. C. (2020). ESG performance and disclosure: A cross-country analysis. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 217–241.

Lyon, T., Lu, Y., Shi, X., & Yin, Q. (2013). How do investors respond to Green Company Awards in China? Ecological Economics, 94, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.020

Mahmut, A., Guzhan, G., & Korkmaz, E. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(S2), S119–S127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2022.11.006

Malik, M. (2015). Value-enhancing capabilities of CSR: A brief review of contemporary literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2051-9

Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592–636. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhu082

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4011987

Naeem, M., Ullah, H., & Jan, S. (2021). The impact of ESG practices on firm performance: Evidence from emerging countries. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 20(1), 731–750.

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002

Olsen, B. C., Awuah-Offei, K., & Bumblauskas, D. (2021). Setting materiality thresholds for ESG disclosures: A case study of US mine safety disclosures. Resources Policy, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101914

Papa, A., Santoro, G., Tirabeni, L., & Monge, F. (2018). Social media as tool for facilitating knowledge creation and innovation in small and medium enterprises. Baltic Journal of Management, 13(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-04-2017-0125

Pedersen, L. H., Fitzgibbons, S., & Pomorski, L. (2021). Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 572–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.11.001

PWC. (2023). ESG in Indonesia : Access to Finance.

Ricci, F., Scafarto, V., Ferri, S., & Tron, A. (2020). Value relevance of digitalization: The moderating role of corporate sustainability. An empirical study of Italian listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 123282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123282

Salvi, A., Vitolla, F., Rubino, M., Giakoumelou, A., & Raimo, N. (2021). Online information on digitalisation processes and its impact on firm value. Journal of Business Research, 124(January 2021), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.025

Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics, 86(8), 867–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0819-3

Scholz, R. W. (2017). Digital threat and vulnerability management: The SVIDT method. Sustainability, 9(4), 554. 9(4), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040554

Scuotto, V., Caputo, F., Villasalero, M., & Del Giudice, M. (2017). A multiple buyer–supplier relationship in the context of SMEs’ digital supply chain management. Production Planning & Control, 28(16), 1378–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1375149

Sebastian, I. M., Ross, J. W., Beath, C., Mocker, M., Moloney, K. G., & Fonstad, N. O. (2020). How Big Old Companies Navigate Digital Transformation. . In Strategic information management, 133-150. Routledge.

Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and Analysis of Moderator Variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150970

Theeke, M., Polidoro Jr, F., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2018). Path-dependent routines in the evaluation of novelty: The effects of innovators’ new knowledge use on brokerage firms’ coverage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(4), 910–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217747269

Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2017). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. The SMS Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Capabilities, 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164054.ch23

Truant, E., Broccardo, L., & Dana, L.-P. (2021). Digitalisation boosts company performance: an overview of Italian listed companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121173

Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 8(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-11-2016-0029

Wright, P., & Ferris, S. P. (1997). Agency conflict and corporate strategy: The effect of divestment on corporate value. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199701)18:1<77::AID-SMJ810>3.0.CO;2-R

Xiao, H., Yang, Z., & Liu, M. (2021). Social responsibility promotion effect of enterprise digitalization: Test of internal and external dual paths. Econ. Manag, 43, 52–69.

Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224

Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103635

Zhang, J., & Li, M. (2021). Research on the relationship between corporate social responsibility, internal control and financial performance: Based on the perspective of technological innovation. Forecast, 40, 81–87.

Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Yuan, J., Wu, M., Li, D., Zhou, Y., & Kang, J. (2018). ESG and corporate financial performance: Empirical evidence from China’s listed power generation companies. Sustainability, 10(8), 2607. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082607




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v24i3.20044

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id

Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View My Stats