The impact of audit committee effectiveness on the relationship between company performance and readability of disclosures: a laboratory experiment

Agus Munandar, Kadlina Kadlina

Abstract


Research aims: This paper investigated the impact of audit committees on the relationship between company performance and disclosure readiness.
Design/Methodology/Approach: Some research suggested that poorly performing companies often present their performance positively but use complex, less accessible language. This can be detrimental to market participants. The study explored the moderating role of audit committees in this relationship using a laboratory experiment. Participants, including employed students, were placed in scenarios with varying company performance and audit committee effectiveness and tasked with simulating financial disclosures.
Research findings: The findings revealed that effective audit committees enhance disclosure readability and significantly moderate the relationship between company performance and disclosure readability. High-performing companies tend to use simpler language, while poorly performing companies often employ complex language to obscure their performance.
Theoretical contribution/Originality: This research contributes to the literature by highlighting the role of audit committee effectiveness in ensuring transparent and clear financial disclosures. It extends previous findings by emphasizing different disclosure strategies based on performance and the critical role of audit committees in curbing obfuscation by underperforming firms.
Practitioner/Policy implication: The results underscored the importance of audit committee effectiveness in improving corporate governance and maintaining investor trust. Policymakers should promote audit committee independence and expertise to ensure higher standards of disclosure
Research limitation/Implication: The study's use of employed students limits generalizability to professional accountants. Nonetheless, it provides valuable insights into the influence of audit committees on disclosure readability, offering a basis for future research.


Keywords


Experimental Method; Performance; Readability

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abernathy, J. L., Beyer, B., Masli, A., & Stefaniak, C. (2015). The association between characteristics of audit committee accounting experts, audit committee chairs, and financial reporting timeliness. Advances in Accounting, 30(2), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2014.09.001

Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475-492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0322

Al-Htaybat, K. A. (2014). Codification Theory is a Gateway for Setting Mandatory Reporting Requirements in Emerging Economies. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(11), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v6n11p21

Al-Okaily, J., & Naueihed, S. (2020). Audit committee effectiveness and family firms: impact on performance. Management Decision, 58(6), 1021-1034. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2018-0422

Alijoyo A, & Zaini S. (2004). Komisaris Independen: Penggerak Praktik GCG di Perusahaan. PT. Gramedia.

An, Y. (2023). Does Quality of Audit Commitee Enhance Audit Quality? International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(2), 1–16.

Asare, S. K., Davidson, R. A., & Gramling, A. A. (2003). The Effect of Management Incentives and Audit Committee Quality on Internal Auditors’ Planning Assessments and Decisions. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.403240

Asay, H. S., Libby, R., & Rennekamp, K. (2018). Firm performance, reporting goals, and language choices in narrative disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(2-3), 380-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.02.002

Baird, J. E., & Zelin, R. C. (2000). The Effects of Information Ordering on Investor Perceptions: an Experiment utilizing President’s Letters. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 71–80.

Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2009). The Audit Committee Oversight Process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(1), 65-122. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.26.1.3

Beattie, V., McInnes, B., & Fearnley, S. (2004). A methodology for analyzing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: A comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Accounting Forum, 28(3), 205-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.001

Bloomfield, R. (2002). The “ Incomplete Revelation Hypothesis ” and Financial Reporting. Conference on Experimental Methods, 16(3), 233–243. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2002.16.3.233

Bushee, B. J., Gow, I. D., & Taylor, D. J. (2018). Linguistic Complexity in Firm Disclosures: Obfuscation or Information?. Journal of Accounting Research, 56(1), 85–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12179

Candraningrat, I. R., Salim, U., Indrawati, N. K., & Ratnawati, K. (2018). Influence of Framing Information and Disposition Effect in Decision of Investment : Experimental Study on Investor Behavior at Indonesia Stock Exchange Representative on Denpasar, Bali. International Review of Management and Marketing, 8(3), 59–68.

Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2004). The Corporate Governance Mosaic and Financial Reporting Quality. Journal of Accounting Literature, 87–152.

Collins-Thompson, K. and Callan, J. (2005). Predicting reading difficulty with statistical language models. Journal of the American Society for Information Acience and Technology, 56(13):1448–1462. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20243

Cozby, P. C. (2024). Methods in behavioral research 15th ed. McGraw Hill LLC.

Davis‐Friday, P. Y., Folami, L. B., Liu, C. S., & Mittelstaedt, H. F. (1999). The value relevance of financial statement recognition vs. disclosure: Evidence from SFAS No. 106. The Accounting Review, 74(4), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.1999.74.4.403

Demaline, C. (2020). Disclosure readability of firms investigated for books-and-records infractions. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(1), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-10-2018-0094

Dlamini, Z. V., Mutambara, E., & Assensoh-Kodua, A. (2017). An investigation into the effectiveness of audit committees. Corporate Board role duties and composition, 13(2), 46–54. http://doi.org/10.22495/cbv13i2art5

Ezat, A. N. (2019). The impact of earnings quality on the association between readability and cost of capital. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9(3), 366-385. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-12-2018-0136

Fischer, A. E., Venter, W. D. F., Collins, S., Carman, M., & Lalla-Edward, S. T. (2021). The readability of informed consent forms for research studies conducted in South Africa. South African Medical Journal, 111(2), 180–183. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i2.14752

Gudono. (2012). Analisis Data Multivariat. BPFE UGM.

Hajek, P., & Henriques, R. (2017). Mining corporate annual reports for intelligent detection of financial statement fraud – A comparative study of machine learning methods. Knowledge-Based Systems, 128, 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.05.001

Hasan, M. M. (2020). Readability of narrative disclosures in 10-K reports: Does managerial ability matter?. European Accounting Review, 29(1), 147-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1528169

Hauser, D. J., Ellsworth, P. C., & Gonzalez, R. (2018). Are manipulation checks necessary? Frontiers in Psychology, 9(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00998

Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of accounting and economics, 31(1-3), 405-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00018-0

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Kostyuk, A., Guedes, M. J. C., & Govorun, D. (2020). Corporate Governance: Examining Key Challenges and Perspectives. International Online Conference, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgekcp

Kotzian, P., Stoeber, T., Hoos, F., & Weissenberger, B. E. (2020). To be or not to be in the sample? On using manipulation checks in experimental accounting research. Accounting Research Journal, 33(3), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-06-2019-0128

Kumar, S., Rao, S., Goyal, K., & Goyal, N. (2022). Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance : A bibliometric overview. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 34, 100652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100652

Kusnadi, Y., Leong, K. S., Suwardy, T., & Wang, J. (2016). Audit committees and financial reporting quality in Singapore. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(1), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2679-0

Lambertsen, N. N. (2024). Manipulation and obfuscation of financial reports. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 51(1-2), 276-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12693

Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and economics, 45(2-3), 221-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003

Liyanarachchi, G., & Milne, M. (2005). Comparing the Investment Decisions of Accounting Practitioners and Students: An Empirical Study on the Adequacy of Student Surrogates. Accounting Forum, 29, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.05.001

Lo, K., Ramos, F., & Rogo, R. (2017). Earnings management and annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.09.002

Lonati, S., Quiroga, B. ., Zehnder, C., & Antonakis, J. (2018). On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations. Journal of Operations Management, 64(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2018.10.003

Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2016). Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), 1187-1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12123

Makhlouf, M. H., Qatawneh, A., & Safi, W. (2024). Narrative disclosure and earnings quality: what is the nexus? Evidence from emerging countries. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-11-2023-0323

Mapuasari, S. A., & Sentosa, C. (2016). An Experiment on Fraudulent Reporting: Internal Control versus Framing, Which One More Influencing? Research Journal of Finance and Accounting www.iiste.org ISSN, 7(12), 1–8. https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RJFA/article/view/31506

Masanja, C. R. (2022). Audit Committee and Internal Control Effectiveness in Public Sector Entities. Business Management Review, 25(2), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.56279/bmrj.v25i2.2

McDaniel, L., R.D. Martin, & L.A. Maines. (2002). Evaluating Financial Reporting Quality: The Effects of Financial Expertise vs Financial Literacy. The Accounting Review, Supplement: Quality of Earnings Conference, 77, 139–167. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.139

Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management?. Journal of Accounting Literature, 26, 116-194.

Mollik, A. T., Mciver, R., Mir, M., & Bepari, md. K. (2020). Effects of Audit Quality and Audit Committee Characteristics on Earnings Management During the Global Financial Crisis – Evidence from Australia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal Volume, 14(4), 85–115. https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v14i4.6

Moreno, A., & Quinn, M. (2021). The Impact of Socioemotional Wealth on Corporate Reporting Readability in a Multinational Family-Controlled Firm. Spanish Accounting Review, 26(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3918887

Mwangi, B. W., Koske, N., & Bonuke, R. (2024). Moderating Role of Audit Committee Effectiveness on the Relationship between Board Gender Characteristic and Quality If Integrated Reporting Among Firms Listed In Nse. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 07(03), 1638–1646. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v7-i3-26

Nahartyo, E. (2012). Desain dan Impelementasi Riset Eksperimen. UPP STIM YKPN.

Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600-2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114

Pandiya, A. (2010). Readability and comprehensibility of informed consent forms for clinical trials. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 1(3), 98.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. 1978. The External Control of Organization: A Resource Dependence Prespective. New York: Harper & Row.

Putri, A. N., Onggo, J., & Andrian, T. (2023). Does Readability Annual Report, External Pressure, and Social Responsibility Disclosure Affect Carbon Emission Disclosure? E3S Web of Conferences, 388(03013), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338803013

Qadri, S. U., Chengang, Y., Jamil, M. F., & Qadri, S. (2018). Corporate Governance and Disclosure Quality: Evidence from the Listed Non-Financial Firms of Pakistan. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 6(11), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0611012

Qinghua, W., Pingxin, W., & Junming, Y. (2006). Audit Committee, Board Characteristics and Quality of Financial Reporting: An Empirical Research on Chinese Securities Marke. Guangli Pinglun Business Review, 49–56.

Reinstein, A., & Houston, M. (2004). Using the securities and exchange commission's “plain English” guidelines to improve accounting students’ writing skills. Journal of Accounting Education, 22(1), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2003.11.001

Rezaee, Z. (2004). Corporate Governance Role in Financial Reporting. Research in Accounting Regulation, 17, 107–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-0457(04)17006-9

Schrand, C. M., & Walther, B. R. (2000). Strategic Benchmarks in Earnings Announcements: The Selective Disclosure of Prior-Period Earnings Components. The Accounting Review, 75(2), 151-177. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.2.151

SEC. (2020). Modernization of Regulation S-K Items 101, 103, and 105. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Stellner, B. (2022). Readability of annual reports on the Vienna stock exchange: A test of management obfuscation hypothesis. Central European Business Review, 11(5), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.307

Tong, H., Wang, Y., Tan, H., Wang, E. Y., & Zhou, B. (2014). When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone , readability , and investor sophistication on earnings judgments When the Use of Positive Language Backfires : Sophistication on Earnings Judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 273–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12039

Yu, K. (2013). Does Recognition versus Disclosure Affect Value Relevance? Evidence from Pension Accounting. The Accounting Review: May, 88(3), 1095–1127. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50381

Yun, F., Lan, T., & Chen, Y. (2023). Cover-up or true? does CSR disclosure really contribute to corporate environmental performance?. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1139088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1139088




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v25i3.21884

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id

Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View My Stats