Accounting Treatment for Heritage Assets: A Case Study on Management of Pari Temple

Heri Widodo, Nur Ravita Hanun, Retno Wulandari

Abstract


Research Aims: This research is conducted to find out how the accounting treatment of the Heritage Asset, Candi Pari, how the assets are recognized, recorded and reported in the financial statements using a case study viewpoint.

Design/Methodology/Approach: The Researchers collected the research data in three phases; first, the Researcher interviewed informants or sources from relevant department or manager of Candi Pari, namely the Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya, Jawa Timur (BPCB), second, the researcher checked documents of the Heritage Assets Candi Pari, how it’s recognized, as what, recorded, until now the value of Heritage Assets is, and the last data searching. Methods of data analysis in research is divided into three stages, first, data reduction, data selection, concentration, attention, abstraction and transforming the raw data from the field, second, the data display, presents data in the narrative and tables form to explain the phenomenon under study and the last is the conclusion.

Research Findings: The results of this study is the recognition of the BPCB Jawa Timur is that Candi Pari is recorded as a plant asset, and Candi Pari is deliberate without value, so the Heritage Assets can not be traded. The amount of this recording conforms with based government accounting standards (PSAP) no. 07 the year 2010 statement no 69 that Heritage Assets must be recorded in the number of units without value.

Theoretical contribution/Originality: The research contributes to find out how the accounting treatment of the Heritage Assets Candi Pari

Practitioner/Policy implication: Heritage assets are a material cultural heritage in the form of cultural heritage objects, cultural heritage buildings, cultural heritage structures, cultural heritage sites and cultural heritage areas on land or in water that needs to be preserved because they have essential values for history, science, education, religion, or culture through the determination process.

Research limitation/Implication: The limitation of this research is that it has only a few informants since, in order to improve the effectiveness of research time, the researcher focuses more on the accounting treatment for Pari Temple as heritage assets.


Keywords


Heritage Assets; Recognition; Recording; Assessment; Pari temple; BPCB Jawa Timur

Full Text:

PDF

References


Act Accounting Policy (2009). Heritage and Community Assets: Measurement of Heritage and Community Assets.

Agustini, A. T. (2011). Arah Pengakuan Pengukuran, Penilaian dan Penyajian Aset Bersejarah dalam Laporan Keuangan pada Entitas Pemerintah Indonesia (Studi Literatur). Skripsi, Universitas Jember, Jember. Retrieved from http://repository.unej.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/187/AISA%20TRI%20A-AKT2.pdf;sequence=1

Anggraini, F. G. (2014). Perlakuan Akuntansi untuk Aset Bersejarah (Studi Fenomenologi pada Pengelolaan Candi Borobudur). Skripsi, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang. Retrieved from http://eprints.undip.ac.id/42920/1/10_ANGGRAINI.pdf

Aversano, N. (2016). Heritage Assets. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-3-319-31816-5_2274-1

Aversano, N. d. J. C. (2012). Governmental Financial Reporting of Heritage Assets in The Perspective of User Needs. Social Science.

Barton, A. D. ( 2000). Accounting for public heritage facilities - assets or liabilities of the government? Accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(2), 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570010323434

Basnan, N., Salleh, M. F. M., Ahmad, A., Harun, A. M., & Upawi, I. (2015). Challenges in accounting for heritage assets and the way forward: Towards implementing accrual accounting in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Society, 11, (63-73). Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Challenges-in-accounting-for-heritage-assets-and-in-Basnan-Salleh/328f254e4537bc773b16a38c265f9d117abb1421

Biondi, L. & Lapsley, I. (2014). Accounting, transparency and governance: the heritage assets problem. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 11(2), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-04-2014-0035

Darmawan, C. B., Yadnyana, I. K. & Sudana, I. P. (2017). Menguak Perlakuan Akuntnasi Aset Bersejarah (Studi interpretif pada Museum Semarjaya Klungkung). E-Journal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana. 6(5), 1785-1816. Retrieved from https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/EEB/article/view/28032

Dhani, U. O., Husaini, & Abdullah T. (2017). Peranan Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya (BPCB) Aceh Dalam Pelestarian Situs-Situs Bersejarah di Kota Banda Aceh Tahun 1990-2015. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM) Program Studi Pendidikan Sejarah. 2(1), 114-125. Retrieved from http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/sejarah/article/download/2521/1334

GRAP. (2012). Generally Recognised Accounting Practice: National treasury. Departement National Treasury Republic of South Africa.

Halim, A. d. M. S. K. (2014). Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi Akuntansi Sektor Publik, Vol. 2. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

IPSAS. (2010). International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) 17 Property Plant and Equipment. New York: International Federation of Accounting.

Moleong, L. ( 1993). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Ouda, H. A. G. T. (2014). Towards a Practical Accounting Approach for Heritage Assets: An Alternative Reporting Model for the NPM Practices. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(2), 29. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303390426_Towards_a_Practical_Accounting_Approach_for_Heritage_Assets_An_Alternative_Reporting_Model_for_the_NPM_Practices

Pallot, J. (1992). Elements of a theoretical framework for public sector accounting. Accounting, Auditting & Accountability Journal, 5(1), 3859. Retrieved from http://www.sciepub.com/reference/48737

PSAP. (2010). Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan (PSAP) Nomor 07 Tahun 2010 Tentang Aset Tetap.

Safitri, M. R., & Indriani, M. (2017). Praktik Akuntansi untuk Aset Bersejarah Studi Fenomenologi pada Museum Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA). 2(2), 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/EKA/article/view/2387

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfa Beta.

Suwardjono. (2010). Teori Akuntansi :Pengungkapan dan Sarana Interpretatif (Vol. 3). Yogyakarta BPFE.

Wild, S. (2013). Accounting for Heritage, Cultural, and Community Assets-Alternative Metrics from a New Zealand Maori Education Institution. AABFJ, 7(1). Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/aabfj/vol7/iss1/2/

Wulandari, D., & Utama, A. A. G. S. (2016). Perlakuan Akuntansi untuk Aset Bersejarah: Pengakuan, Penilaian dan Pengungkapannya dalam Laporan Keuangan (Studi kasus pada Museum Anjuk Ladang Kabupaten Nganjuk). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting. 4(3), 1-11. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/3693

Yusuf. (2010). Langkah Pengelolaan Aset Daerah Menuju Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Terbaik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.2101138

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id

Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View My Stats