Menilai Keberhasilan Balanced Scorecard sebagai Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Strategik

Tri Ramaraya Koroy

Abstract


This paper reviews the literature of Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a strategic performance measurement tool. The research concerning the effectiveness of BSC indicate that BSC is a useful tool for communicating strategy, strategic learning and developing organizational culture. However, related research also shows that the implementation of BSC is not associated with economic benefit particularly for short-term period. This suggests that the adoption of BSC need a careful inquiry by the organization and the organization should not accept it as a ‘generic’ solution as a performance measurement tool.


Keywords


Balanced Scorecard; Peformance Measurement; Management Control Systems

Full Text:

Download Article

References


Banker, R.D., G. Potter dan D. Srinivasan. 2000. An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures. The Accounting Review, 75: 65-92.

Banker, R.D. H. Chang, M.J. Pizzini. 2004. The balance scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measure linked to strategy. The Accounting Review, 80.

Behn, B.K. dan R.A. Riley. 1999. Using non-financial information to predict financial performance: the case of the US airline industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 14 (1): 29-56.

Campbell, D., S. Datar, S.C. Kulp dan V.G. Narayanan. 2003. Using the balance scorecard as a control system for monitoring and revising corporate strategy. Working paper, Harvard University

Epstein, M.J. 2002. Measuring the payoffs of corporate actions: the use of financial and non-financial indicators. Dalam Epstein, M.J. dan J-F. Manzoni (eds). Performance Measurement and Management Control: A Compendium of Research. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Epstein, M.J. dan J-F. Manzoni. 1997. The balanced scorecard and tableau de bord: translating strategy into action. Management Accounting, 79: 28-36.

Hoque, Z. dan W. James. 2000. Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impacts on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12: 1-17.

Ittner, C.D dan D.F. Larcker. 1998a. Are non-financial measures leading indicator of financial performance? an analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research, 26 (Supplement): 1-34.

------- dan -------. 1998b. Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10: 205-238.

------- dan --------. 2003. Coming up short on nonfinancial performance measurement. Harvard Business Review, November: 88-95.

-------, ------ dan M.W. Meyer. 2003a. Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review, 78(3): 725-758.

-------, ------ dan T. Randall. 2003b. Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28 (7-8): 715-741.

Kaplan, R.S. dan D.P. Norton. 1992. The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, (January-February): 71-79.

------- dan -------. 1993. Putting balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, (September-October): 134-147.

------- dan -------. 1996. Translating Strategy Into Action: Balanced Scorecard. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

------- dan -------. 2001. The Strategy-Focused Organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Langfield-Smith, K. 1997. Management control systems and strategy: a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22 (2): 207-232.

Libby, T., S. Salterio dan A. Webb. 2002. the effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment. Working paper, Wilfried Laurier University dan Waterloo University.

Lipe, m.G. dan S. Salterio. 2000. The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review, 75(3): 283-298.

Malina, M.A dan F.H. Selto. 2001. Communicating and controlling strategy: an empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13: 47-90.

Marginson, D.E.W. 2002. Management control systems and their effects on strategy formation at middle-management levels: evidence from a U.K. organization. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 1019-1031.

Mendoza, C. dan O. Saulpic. 2002. Strategic management and management control: designing a new theoretical framework. Dalam Epstein, M.J. dan J-F. Manzoni (eds). Performance Measurement and Management Control: A Compendium of Research. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Mintzberg, H., B. Ahlstrand dan J. Lampel. 1998. Strategy Safary. New York: The Free Press.

Nagar, V. dan M. Rajan. 2001. The revenue implications of financial and operational measures of product quality. The Accounting Review, 76: 497-5-513.

Roberts, J., M. Albright dan G. Hibbets. 2004. Debiasing balanced scorecard evaluations. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 16: 75-98.

Said, A.A., H.R. HassabElnaby dan B. Wier. 2003. An empirical investigation of the performance consequences of nonfinancial measures. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 15: 193-223.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Office:
Ruang Jurnal Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis UMY
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ai - E-mail: jai@umy.ac.id

Journal of Accounting and Investment is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

View My Stats