Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The focus of the BERDIKARI study is on the competitiveness of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (UMKM) and Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDES), cooperation between village administrations, the capacity of women's organizations, creativity and information technology in education and learning in schools and colleges, community social institutions in disaster management, litigation for the resolution of disputes in the community, productivity of the food processing industry, public health and hospital management, and the digitization of Islamic symbols. BERDIKARI aims to encourage the development of government policy praxis, the application of appropriate technology, information technology innovation, and community empowerment models in the framework of the human development ecosystem and the flora and fauna environment in line with the issues of sustainable development goals (SDGs). 

 

Section Policies

Front Pages

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

End Page

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The review process applies a double-blind review.

Articles submitted to the editorial office of BERDIKARI: Journal of Innovation and Application of Science and Technology will be reviewed initially by the Managing Editor, and the following decisions will be made.

  1. The publication process continues by appointing an editor according to scientific expertise.
  2. The publication process continues by revising the Managing Editor's initial review notes.
  3. It is rejected because it does not meet the basic requirements, especially regarding the focus and scope.
The editor appoints a reviewer (Mitra Bestari) suited to his/her expertise to carry out the review.
  1. If the results of the review state that it is ELIGIBLE to be published with notes on improvements, the author is obliged to correct the article according to the reviewer's notes.
  2. If the article is not suitable for publication because the substance does not contain new data and research results (novelty), it becomes archives of BERDIKARI editorial staff.
The editor will further review and edit (using BERDIKARI style) the article after the author's improvements according to the review.
  1. The author revises the article according to the editor's notes.
  2. The editor sends the revised results to the Chief Editor.

The Chief Editor carries out a final review (proofreading) of the results of revision by the author according to the notes of reviewers and editorial teams.


After the Chief Editor’s approval, the language editor performs a Turnitin check and language editing to the article.

The graphic designer carries out the layout and cover design in line with the aesthetic taste of BERDIKARI: Journal Inovasi dan Penerapan Ipteks.

* The length of time for the review process (the process from the article being submitted until accepted) takes between 4-12 weeks (8 weeks on average)

For the Chart of Peer Review Process can you see link Download Here

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes Garuda (Garba Rujukan Digital), Google Scholar and Dimension to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

 

Publication Ethic

Publication Ethics on Berdikari is based on Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). We have personalized this COPE that suitable from our journal such as: Authorship, Complaints, Conflict of Interest Policy, Publication Ethics (Authors, Editors, and Reviewers), Privacy Statement, Copyright, Publication Charges, About this Publishing System, Open Access Policy, Peer Review Process, and Disclaimer. For detail of this ethics, you can find the explanation below.

Authorship

Authorship or a co-author means a person who has made a significant contribution to manuscript and who shares responsibilities and accountability of the results.  If a manuscript is written by more than one author, you’ll choose one person to be the corresponding author. This person will handle all correspondence about the manuscript and sign the publishing agreement on behalf of all the authors. If you are a co-author, this means that

  1. You have made a significant contribution to the research, whether it is in the concept or design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas.
  2. You have drafted, written, or revised the article.
  3. You have reviewed and agreed on the final version of the article before submission.
  4. You have agreed on the journal to which your manuscript will be submitted.
  5. You are aware that you are taking responsibility and accountability for the content of the manuscript.
  6. You are aware that the corresponding author will be acting on your behalf in any communication about the article, through submission, peer review, production, and after publication.
  7. In line with standard publishing ethics, if your article is found to be unsafe, have errors, in some way fraudulent, or in breach of the publishing agreement, that responsibility is shared by all named co-authors.

 

Complaints

Authors who may have grievances about any aspect of their interaction with the Berdiakri should e-mail the Editor-in-Chief by email. All questions or complaints will be responded within 7 days. If required, the Editor-in-Chief will consult with other editors regarding the complaint. The Editor-in-Chief will liaise directly with the complainant and thoroughly explain the steps they have taken to resolve the matter.

 

Conflict of Interest Policy

Authors who submit their manuscripts to Berdikari must disclose all relationship or interest that could influence, or bias the work. Although authors may  not be aware of potential conflicts, disclosure of relationships and interest affords a more transparent process, leading to an accurate and objective assessment of the work. A few potential conflicts of interests that are directly or indirectly related to the research may include but are not limited to the following:

    1. Research grants from funding agencies (please give the research funder and the grant number)

    2. Honoraria for speaking at conferences

    3. Financial support for attending conferences

    4. Financial support for educational programs

    5. Support from a project sponsor

    6. Position on advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationships

    7. Multiple affiliations

    8. Intellectual property rights (e.g. patents, copyrights and royalties from such rights)

The corresponding author of the manuscript will include a summary statement on the title page that is separate from their manuscript. This statement reflects what is recorded in the potential conflict of interes disclosure form(s).

 

Publication Ethics - Authors

  1. Reporting Standard: Reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient details and references to permit others to replicate the work.
  2. Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
  3. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior which is not accepted.
  4. Acknowledgement of Sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  6. Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Publication Ethics - Editors

  1. Fair Play: An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. 
  2. Confidentiality: The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a sub-mitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
  3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
  4. Criteria of Editors: Editors, both local and international, should have a, minimum of H Index / Scopus ID or a paper or manuscript published in an International Journal with a Scopus Index, especially on the topic of Community Engagement. An editor can help the reviewers to give an input to manuscript beside the result of review by reviewer.
  5. Publication Decisions: The editorial board is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal to be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
  6. Review of Manuscripts: Editors must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. Editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

Publication Ethics - Reviewers

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer reviewers assist the editors in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author for improving the paper.

  2. Criteria of Reviewers: Reviewers, both local and international, must have a paper or manuscript which have been published in International Journal with a Scopus Index, especially on the topic of Community Empowerment. And also the reviewers have been publish an article with the same theme with the manuscript that will be reviewing. Or the reviewer have a community empowerment program with the same theme.

  3. Standards of Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

  4. Confidentiality: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

  5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

  6. Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by relevant citations. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  7. Time Periode of Reviewing: Reviewers should review the manuscript within 1 until 2 month (maximum). And total of reviewer every manuscript is 2 reviewer (minimum) and 5 reviewer (maximum).

 

Indexing site

Berdikari is Indexed and Abstracted by:

1. Sinta

2. Garuda

3. Google Scholar

4. Crossref

5. Dimension

6. BASE

7. ROAD

 

 

Plagiarism Checker

Berdikari uses google scholar and Turnitin plagscan checking before deciding whether an article is accepted or not. Maximum permitted similarity is 25%

 

Publication Fee

Berdikari: Jurnal Inovasi dan penerapan ipteks charges the author fees for article publication IDR 400,000.

Authors are required to pay an article publication fee once their article gets accepted for publication.

 

 

Retraction, Withdrawal and Correction-Policy

Retraction, Withdrawal and Correction-Policy

 Policy Statement

The BERDIKARI Jurnal Inovasi dan Penerapan IPTEK acknowledges that the author(s) have worked precisely  in preparing the  manuscript and peer-review procedures will be carried out by the Editors.. However, for research purposes, there is also the possibility for published papers to be removed or even withdrawal

It is not lighly to do and can only be done under exceptional circumstances..

 Consequesntly, corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies, if necessary, will also be carried out with strict criteria to preserve confidence in the authority of its electronic archives. Our dedication and strategy are to preserve the quality and completeness of relevant scientific documents in the collections of researchers and librarians.

  Content Integrity and Maintenance

The BERDIKARI Jurnal Inovasi dan Penerapan IPTEK recognizes the importance to scholars and librarians of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record and attaches the utmost importance to preserving confidence in the authority of its electronic archive. Clicking on the CrossMark icon will remind the reader of the current status of the document and will also provide additional publication record information on the document. Applying the CrossMark icon is a promise made by the BERDIKARI Jurnal Inovasi dan Penerapan IPTEK to keep content published and warn readers to change as and when occurred.

  Article Retraction

BERDIKARI Jurnal Inovasi dan Penerapan IPTEK is committed to conduct its part in upholding the credibility of the scholarly record, and it is therefore appropriate, on occasion, to remove the article(s). Article(s) can be removed if:

There is a significant scientific mistake that may invalidate the conclusions of the article, for example, there is strong proof that the findings are not credible, either as a result of fraud (e.g. data manufacturing) or an honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error).

The results have previously been published elsewhere without sufficient cross-reference, permission or justification.

There are ethical problems such as plagiarism (appropriation of the ideas, procedures, findings or words of other person(s) without giving due credit, even those gained by confidential analysis of the manuscripts of others) or unauthorized authorship.

 In order to ensure that retractions are treated in compliance with the best practice of publishing and the COPE Retraction Guidelines, BERDIKARI Jurnal Inovasi dan Penerapan IPTEK adopts the following retraction process:

An article requiring possible retraction shall be brought to the attention of the editor of the journal.

The editor of the journal should obey the step-by-step instructions according to the COPE flowcharts (including evaluating a response from the author of the article in question).

Before any decision is taken, the reports of the editor should be forwarded to the Ethics Advisory Board which will be a forum to provide an advise and recommendations regarding ethical issues. The goal of this move is to ensure a consistent approach in line with industry best practices.

The final decision on whether to withdraw is then conveyed to the author and, if necessary, to all other relevant bodies, such as the institution of the author on occasion.

The Retraction Statement is then posted online and released in the next available journal issue (see below for more details of this step).

Notice that if author(s)hold copyright for an article, this does not mean that they automatically have a right to remove it after publication. The credibility of the published scientific record is of utmost importance and the COPE Retraction Rules still apply in such situations.

 Article Withdrawal

The author is not permitted to withdraw the submitted manuscripts because the withdrawal is a waste of valuable resources since editors and referees have spent a great deal of time editing the submitted manuscript and the works invested by the publisher. The author is obliged to approve the checklist provided before sending the manuscript via OJS.

If the manuscript has been published as "Article in Press" (articles that have been accepted for publication but which has not been formally published and will not have the complete volume/issue/page information) that include errors, or are discovered to be accidental duplicates of other published article(s), or are determined to violate our journal publishing ethics guidelines in the view of the editors (such as multiple submissions, bogus claims of authorship, plagiarism, fraudulent use of data or the like), maybe "Withdrawn" From the BERDIKARI Jurnal Inovasi dan Penerapan IPTEK website. Withdrawing means that the article content (HTML and PDF) is deleted and replaced with an HTML page and PDF simply states that the article has been withdrawn.

If the author requests removal of the manuscript, an official letter signed by the corresponding author and Head of Department of the affiliated institution should be submitted to the Principal Editor.

Article Correction

BERDIKARI Jurnal Inovasi dan Penerapan IPTEK should consider making a correction if:

A small part of otherwise reliable publication reports incorrect data or proves to be inaccurate, particularly if this is the product of an honest mistake.

The list of author(s)or contributors is wrong (e.g. a deserving Author has been omitted or someone who does not meet authorship criteria has been included).

Corrections to peer-reviewed material fall into one of three categories:

Publisher correction (erratum): inform readers of a significant error made by the publisher/journal staff (usually a production error) which has a negative effect on the publication record or the scientific credibility of the article or on the reputation of the authors or journals.

Author correction (corrigendum): to inform readers of a significant error made by the authors which has a negative effect on the publication record or the scientific reputation of the paper, or on the reputation of the Authors or the journal.

Addendum: an addition to the article by its authors to clarify contradictions, extend existing work, or otherwise explain or update the details in the main work.

The decision whether a correction should be made is made by the editor(s) of a journal, often with recommendations from the members of the Reviewers or the Editorial Board. Handling Editors will approach the Writers of the paper concerned with a request for clarification, but with a final determination as to whether a correction is needed and, if so, which form of correction rests with the Editors.

  Article Removal

In a very limited number of instances, it may be appropriate to delete a published article from BERDIKARI Jurnal Inovasi dan Penerapan IPTEK online website. This can only happen if the article is explicitly defamatory or infringes the legal rights of others, or if the article is, or we have practical reason to accept it to be, the subject of a court order, or if the article, if acted upon, may pose a significant health danger. In such cases, the metadata (i.e. title and author information) of the article will be preserved, the text will be replaced by a screen showing that the article has been deleted for legal purposes.

  Article Replacement

In situations where an article can pose a significant health risk, the authors of the original paper may decide to remove the original faulty and substitute it with a corrected edition. In such cases, the procedures for retraction referred to above will be followed with the difference that the notice of retraction of the article will include a link to the revised re-published article along with the history of the text.