Twitter Diplomacy @Kemlu_RI: A Case Study of Bali Democracy Forum 2019

Ludiro Madu

Abstract


Following the increasing use of social media, particularly Twitter, the Indonesian MOFA made an official Twitter account @Kemlu_RI for disseminating information. The paper aims to to analyse the trend of tweeting at the official Twitter account of the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), @Kemlu_RI. This research used a qualitative approach through online media, Twitter. Data was obtained through observation of the conversation trend on Twitter by monitoring @Kemlu_RI account. This research focussed on the use of hashtag #BDF2019. Using ‘Drone Emprit Academic’ (DEA), this research collected data on five days of Twitter conversation. The DEA analysis resulted in 1.088 conversations. Rather than only disseminating information, the use of DEA for analysing #BDF2019 at @Kemlu_RI turned out to produce more findings. The result of this study shows that the DEA usage gives more benefits to Indonesian digital diplomacy, such as top hashtag, top influencer, social network analyses, and most engaged users, rather than just general dissemination of information of the BDF 2019. Therefore, the use of the DEA is very significant for resulting in more accurate data for Indonesian MOFA in order to manage a better strategy for using Twitter in its future diplomatic agenda.


Keywords


Drone Emprit Academic, @Kemlu_RI, Indonesian MOFA, Bali Democracy Forum, Indonesian digital diplomacy, #BDF2019

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Muftah, H., Weerakkody, V., Rana, N. P., Sivarajah, U., & Irani, Z. (2018). Factors influencing e-diplomacy implementation: Exploring causal relationships using interpretive structural modelling. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 502–514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.002

Albishri, O., Tarasevich, S., Proverbs, P., Kiousis, S. K., & Alahmari, A. (2019). Mediated public diplomacy in the digital age: Exploring the Saudi and the U.S. governments’ agenda-building during Trump’s visit to the Middle East. Public Relations Review, 45(4), 101820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101820

Anam, K., M Kolopaking, L., & A Kinseng, R. (2020). The Effectiveness of Social Media Usage within Social Movement to Reject the Reclamation of the Jakarta Bay, Indonesia. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 8(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.22500/8202028955

Booten, K. (2016). Hashtag Drift. 2401–2405. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858398

Brigg, M., Wilson, L., de Jalong, F., & Sugiono, M. (2016). Diversity, democratisation and Indonesian leadership. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(4), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1153599

Chhabra, R. (2020). Twitter Diplomacy: A Brief Analysis. orfonline.org. Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/ORF_IssueBrief_335_TwitterDiplomacy.pdf

Collins, S. D., DeWitt, J. R., & LeFebvre, R. K. (2019). Hashtag diplomacy: twitter as a tool for engaging in public diplomacy and promoting US foreign policy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(2), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00119-5

Dodd, M. D., & Collins, S. J. (2017). Public relations message strategies and public diplomacy 2.0: An empirical analysis using Central-Eastern European and Western Embassy Twitter accounts. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.004

Duncombe, C. (2017). Twitter and transformative diplomacy: social media and Iran–US relations. International Affairs, 93(3), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix048

Fahmi, I. (2017). Drone Emprit: Konsep dan Teknologi. Retrieved October 28, 2019, from IT Camp on Big data and Data Mining, Jakarta website: https://www.slideshare.net/IsmailFahmi3/drone-emprit-konsep-dan-teknologi

Felt, M. (2016). Social media and the social sciences: How researchers employ Big Data analytics. Big Data and Society, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716645828

Gruzd, A., & Wellman, B. (2014). Networked Influence in Social Media: Introduction to the Special Issue. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(10), 1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214527087

Grzywacz, A. (2019). Indonesia’s (inter)national role as a Muslim democracy model: effectiveness and conflict between the conception and prescription roles. Pacific Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1585387

Hadiansyah, H., Purwandari, B., Satria, R., & Yudhoatmojo, S. B. (2018). Social media strategies for public diplomacy: A case study in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Informatics and Computing, ICIC 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAC.2017.8280636

Ittefaq, M. (2019). Digital diplomacy via social networks: a cross-national analysis of governmental usage of Facebook and twitter for digital engagement. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 18(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.17477/jcea.2019.18.1.049

Karim, M. F. (2016). Role conflict and the limits of state identity: the case of Indonesia in democracy promotion. Pacific Review, 30(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2016.1249908

Laagu, M. A., & Setyo Arifin, A. (2020). Analysis the Issue of Increasing National Health Insurance (BPJS Kesehatan) Rates through Community Perspectives on Social Media: A Case Study of Drone Emprit. Proceeding - ICoSTA 2020: 2020 International Conference on Smart Technology and Applications: Empowering Industrial IoT by Implementing Green Technology for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoSTA48221.2020.1570615599

Lie, W., & Siagian, M. (2018). Indonesian Interests in Bali Democracy Forum. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Volume 241 5th International Conference on Social and Political Sciences (IcoSaPS 2018), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.2991/icosaps-18.2018.15

Manor, I, & Segev, E. (2020). Social Media Mobility: Leveraging Twitter Networks in Online Diplomacy. Global Policy, 11(2), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12799

Manor, Ilan, & Pamment, J. (2019). Towards prestige mobility? Diplomatic prestige and digital diplomacy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1577801

Mattoš, B. (2015). Effects of information and communication technology on diplomacy and foreign policy administration. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsesd.2015010102

Saravanan, C., Masthan, M. A., Kethri K, S., Harsha, C., & Reddy, M. A. (2020). Analysis of trending hastags on

Twitter. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(07), 1863–1867.

Sevin, E., Manor, I., Ittefaq, M., Setiadi, T., Manor, I., Segev, E., & CHHABRA, R. (2018). From embassy ties to Twitter links: Comparing offline and online diplomatic networks. Policy & Internet, 9999, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.199 #

Šimunjak, M., & Caliandro, A. (2019). Twiplomacy in the age of Donald Trump: Is the diplomatic code changing? Information Society, 35(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1542646

Small, T. A. (2011). What the Hashtag? Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2011.554572

Sobel, M., Riffe, D., & Hester, J. B. (2016). Twitter Diplomacy? A Content Analysis of Eight US Embassies’ Twitter Feeds. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 5(2), 75–107. Retrieved from https://www.thejsms.org/index.php/TSMRI/article/view/168/79

Strauß, N., Kruikemeier, S., van der Meulen, H., & van Noort, G. (2015). Digital diplomacy in GCC countries: Strategic communication of Western embassies on Twitter. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 369–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.001

Suharso, P. (2019). Pemanfaatan Drone Emprit dalam Melihat Trend Perkembangan Bacaan Digital melalui Akun Twitter. Anuva, 3(4), 333–346. Retrieved from http://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/anuva%0APemanfaatan

Tucker Yépez, J. J., Pusay Villarroel, B. A., & Samaniego Rojas, P. A. (2019). Analysis of digital diplomacy and E-society in the context of internet governance. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(3), 134–139.

Umakanth, N., & Santhi, S. (2020). Classification and ranking of trending topics in twitter using tweets text. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(4), 895–899. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.04.171

Uysal, N., & Schroeder, J. (2019). Turkey’s Twitter public diplomacy: Towards a “new” cult of personality. Public Relations Review, 45(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101837

Xiong, Y., Cho, M., & Boatwright, B. (2019). Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the# MeToo …. Public Relations Review, 45(1), 10–23. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811118302303




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v10i1.11566

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Hubungan Internasional

 Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Indexed by:

      

Editorial Office of Jurnal Hubungan Internasional 

Ki Bagus Hadikusumo Building, E4, 1st floor, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Jl. Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, 55183, Indonesia
jurnalhi@umy.ac.id ariekusumapaksi@umy.ac.id

 

Jurnal Hubungan Internasional in collaboration with:

   

Creative Commons License   

Jurnal Hubungan Internasional is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats