Turkish Foreign Policy to European Union and Its Chance to be a European Union Member

Anton Minardi


The Modern Turkish was established as a secular state whose special characteristic was brought from the Ottoman Islamic empire. The area of Turkey’s geopolitics is stretching from Asian to European continent, and always more inclined to the West. These circumstances have formed Turkish foreign policy for decades by indicating the bridging for the Asia on the East and Europe on the West with its motto “peace at home, peace abroad”. As the secular state, Turkey recognized themselves as a country whose identity similar to the Western states given the fact that Turkish foreign policy always strive to join  the European Union as their priority, as well as Turkey as a NATO member. Turkey showed a great effort through their involvement in various European affairs such as member of the Europe Council 1949, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) 1952, European Economic Community (EEC) 1959, member of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 1961, European Community 1964, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) in 1973, and officially applied to be member of European Union (EU) on April 14 1987. However, some obstacles remain such as the reluctance of the West toward Turkish performance in dealing with the Cyprus and Kurdish crises. This article explains how Turkish government perform its foreign policy by considering the discussion of Turkish Geopolitics, Turkish Foreign Policy, Turkey - EU Relation, Membership Issue in the EU, The Role of the U.S. to Turkish Membership in the EU, and the Chances for Turkey to be the EU member.


Peradaban Turki modern dibentuk atas sekularitas negara dengan karakteristik khusus yang diadopsi dari kerajaan Islam Ottoman. Wilayah strategis Turki yang membentang dari benua Asia hingga Eropa telah membentuk politik luar negeri Turki selama berabad-abad dimana negara ini menempatkan diri sebagai jembatan yang menghubungkan kedua benua dengan motto “peace at home, peace abroad. Meskipun demikian Politik luar negeri Turki dianggap lebih condong pada Eropa karena kesamaan identitas yang dimilikinya. Hal ini ditandai dengan keikutsertaan Turki dalam beberapa agenda internasional Uni Eropa seperti Europe Council tahun 1949, North Atlantic treaty Organization (NATO) 1952, European Economic Community (EEC) 1959, maupun agenda-agenda lainnya dan secara resmi mendaftar sebagai anggota Uni Eropa pada 14 April 1987. Akan tetapi, kebijakan Turki terhadap krisis Cyprus dan Etnis Kurdi menyebabkan kecanggungan bagi negara-negara yang tergabung dalam Uni Eropa. Tulisan ini menjelaskan politik luar negeri Pemerintah Turki terkait isu keanggotaan dalam UE serta pengaruh Amerika dalam kasus tersebut.


Turkish Geopolitics; Turkish Foreign Policy; European Union; the Role of the U.S.; Membership Issues; Geopolitik Turki; Politik Luar Negeri Turki; Uni Eropa; Peran Amerika; Isu keanggotaan Turki

Full Text:




Berridge, G.R. 2010. Diplomacy-Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave.

Cendrowicz, Leo. 2009. Fifty Years On, Turkey Still Pines to Become European. (Online), (http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1920882,00.html).

Davutoglu, Ahmet. 2010. Turkey’s Zero-Problems Foreign Policy. (Online), (http://foreignpolicy.com/2010/05/20/turkeys-zero-problems-foreign-policy/).

Hill and Smith. 2011. International Relations and the European Union. New York: Oxford University press.

Hudson, M., Valerie, Vore, S., Christopher. 1995. Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Mershon International Studies Review (online), Volume 39, Issue 2, October 1995, (http://www.jstor.org).

_____ A Guide to The United States’ History of Recognition, Diplomatic, and Consular Relations, by Country, Since 1776: Turkey. (Online), (https://history.state.gov/countries/turkey).

_____ Turkish Foreign Policy During Ataturk's Era. (online), (http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkish-foreign-policy-during-ataturks-era.en.mfa)

Jackson, J., Robert. 2013. Global Politics in the 21th Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kapucu, Naim, Palabiyik, Hamit. 2008. Turkish Public administration from Tradition to the Modern Age. Ankara: International Strategic Research Organization (ISRO).

Modebadze, Valeri, Sayin, Mehmet, Fatih. 2015. Why Turkey Should Join the European Union: Arguments In Favor of Turkish Membership. The Institute for Research and European Studies: Journal of Liberty and International Affairs (online), Vol. 1, No. 2. (http://e-jlia.com/papers/v2_8.pdf.)

Müftüler-Baç, Meltem. (n.d.). Turkish Foreign Policy in Turbulent Times. (Online), (http://Www.E-ir.info/2015/01/25/turkish-foreign-policy-in-turbulent-times/).

Neack, Laura. 2008. The New Foreign Policy Power Seeking in a Globalized Era. The U.S.A: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Sayari, Sabri. (n.d.). The United States and Turkey’s Membership in The European Union. (Online), (http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/44/674/8589.pdf)

Turan, Ilter. 2011. Turkish Foreign Policy: Interplay Between the Domestic and External. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (Online), (http://carnegieendowment.org/2011/09/21/turkish-foreign-policy-interplay-between-domestic-and-external#).

Zanotti, Jim. 2015. Turkey: Background and U.S. Relations. Congressional Research Service (online). (www.crs.gov).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.5291

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 4 times
PDF - 2 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Hubungan Internasional

Creative Commons License   

Jurnal Hubungan Internasional by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jhi.

Print ISSN: 1829-5088 / Online ISSN: 2503-3883