Perjanjian Hudaibiyah Sebagai Model Kepatuhan Terhadap Perjanjian Internasional dalam Perspektif Islam

Sidiq Ahmadi


This research aims to explain why the Prophet Muhammad comply withThe Hudaybiya Treaty although in its articles are considered harmful. By answering the question above, it is expected to build a model of compliance to international agreement in the Islamic perspective. Christian Reus-Smit’sintertistial conception of politics considered appropriate in this study because it provides space for the role of ideas such as identity and norm in explaining a political action. This study found Prophet Muhammad complieswith Treaty of Hudaibiyah because of political deliberation which integrate four type or reason: idiographic, purposive, ethical, and instrumental. Ideographic deliberation determines the formulation of interest (purposive deliberation). The formulation of these interests will determine the action (instrumental deliberation) in accordance with the available resources and external constrain faced, as well as appropriate with or not contrary to Islamic norms and universally applicable norms (ethical deliberation). Ideographically, based on identities: as believers who should obey Allah and His Messenger, as a noble people who hold the promise. Purposively, the mission of Muslims is to preach the religion of monotheism to all mankind, therefore the condition of peace and religious freedom must be realized. Ethically, the question of how should we act is answered by everything done must in concordance with Islamic rules and customary law norms which emphasize the obligation to comply with the concluded agreements. Instrumentally, the chosen action which in line with the formulated interest and in accordance with the norms of Islam is complieswith the peace treaty.


Hudaibiyah Treaty; Compliance; International Agreements; Islam

Full Text:



Abu Sulayman, Abdul Hamid A.1987. The Islamic Theory of International Relations: New Directions for Islamic Methodology and

Thought. Herndon, WV:International Institute of Islamic Thought

Abu Zahrah, Muhammad.1973. Hubungan-Hubungan Internasional

dalam Islam. Terj.Jakarta: Penerbit Bulan Bintang

Al Buqha, Musthafa dan Misto,Muhyidin.2002. Pokok-Pokok Ajaran

Islam: Syarah Arbain An Nawawiyah.Terj. Jakarta: Robbani Press.

Al Ghadban, Munir Muhammad. 2008. Manhaj Haraki: Strategi

Pergerakan dan Perjuangan Politik dalam Sirah Nabi Saw. Terj.

Jakarta: Robbani Press

Al Mubarakfury, Syafiyyurrahman. 1997. Sirah Nabawiyah. Terj.

Jakarta:Pustaka Al Kautsar

Al-Buthy, Said Ramadhan. 2010. Fikih Sirah. Terj. Jakarta:Hikmah

Al-Muafiri, Abu Muhammad Abdul Malik bin Hisyam. 2010. Sirah

Nabawiyah Ibnu Hisyam. Jilid 2. Terj.Bekasi: Darul Falah.

An-Nadwi, Abul Hasan Ali Al Hasani. 2009. Sirah Nabawiyah: Sejarah Lengkap Nabi Muhammad SAW. Terj. Yogyakarta: Mardhiyah Press.

Ar-Rifai, Muhammad Nasib. 2000. Kemudahan dari Allah: Ringkasan

Tafsir Ibnu Katsir. Jilid 4. Terj. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.

Ashri, Muhammad dan Rapung Samudin.2013. Hukum Internasional

dan Hukum Islam tentang Sengketa dan Perdamaian.Jakarta: PT

Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Bao,Wang Yong (Ahmed Musa).2009. Diplomacy: Theory and Practice in Islam. Kuala Lumpur: International Islamic University Malaysia.

Bsoul, Labeeb Ahmed.2008.International Treaties (Mu’ahadaat) in

Islam: Theory and Practice in the Light of Islamic International Law

(siyar) according to Ortodox Schools.Plymouth: University Press of


Chalil, Moenawar. 2001. Kelengkapan Tarikh Nabi Muhammad SAW.

Jilid 4. Terj. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.

Guzman,Andrew T. 2002. “A Compliance Based Theory of International Law”.California Law Review. Vol 90. Tersedia dihttp:// Diakses 15 Juli 2011

Hamidullah, Muhammad. 1987. Muslim Conduct of State.Lahore: SH.

Muhammad Ashraf Hilal, Iyad.2002. Perjanjian-Perjanjian Internasional dalam Pandangan Islam. Bogor: Pustaka Thariqul Izzah.

Iqbal, Afzal.2000. Diplomasi Islam. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kautsar

Khadduri,Majid.1956. “Islam and the Modern Law of Nations”. The

American Journal of International Law. Vol 50.No 2. April. Diakses

melalui JStor di

Khadduri,Majid.2006. War and Peace in the Law of Islam.New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchage,LTD

Kingsbury,Benedict.1998.” The Concept of Compliance as A function of Competing Conceptions of International Law”. Michigan Journal of InternationalLaw. Vol19. No 2. Winter. Tersedia di http://

diakses 17 Juli 2011

Lele, Gabriel dkk. 2010. Panduan Penulisan Akademik. Yogyakarta:

Fisipol UGM

Pipes, Daniel.1999.” Al Hudaibiya and Lesson from Prophet

Muhammads diplomacy “.Middle East Quarterly. September diakses tanggal 18 Juli 2011

Qureshi,Muhammad Siddique.1991. Foreign Policy of Hadrat

Muhammad (saw). New Delhi: Kitab Bavhan

Quthb,Sayyid. 2004. Tafsir Fi Zhilalil Quran: Di Bawah Naungan Al

Quran. Jilid 20. Terj. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.

Rochester, J.Martin. 2006. Between Peril and Promise: The Politics of International Law. Whasington D.C.: CQ Press.

Silverman, David.2005. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical

Handbook.2ed. London: Sage Publications.

Smit, Christian Reus (ed). 2004. The Politics of International Law.

Cambrigde: Cambridge University Press

Smith, Perry. 2006. “Of War and Peace: The Hudaibiya Model of Islamic Diplomacy”. Florida Journal of International Law.Vol 18.p.136-167

Tadjbakhsh, Shahrbanou.2010. “International Relations Theory And The Islamic Worldview”. dalam Acharya, Amitav and Barry Buzan. 2010. Non-Western International Relations Theory Perspectives on and beyond Asia. New York: Routledge

Vienna Convention on the law of treaties (with annex). Tersedia di

volume-1155-I-18232-English.pdf diakses 14 Juli 2014


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1 times
PDF - 1 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Hubungan Internasional

Creative Commons License   

Jurnal Hubungan Internasional by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Based on a work at

Print ISSN: 1829-5088 / Online ISSN: 2503-3883