Museum Diplomacy and Postcolonial Memory: The Revolusi! Exhibition in Indonesian-Dutch Relations

Authors

  • Budi Riyanto Department of Communication, LSPR Institute of Communication and Business, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-0308
  • Willemijn Mechteld Maria Dortant Department of International Public Policy and Leadership, The Hague University of Applied Sciences (THUAS), The Hague, Netherlands
  • Claudia Christianauli Department of Communication, LSPR Institute of Communication and Business, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Past Novel Larasaty Department of Communication, LSPR Institute of Communication and Business, Jakarta, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-1760

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jhi.v14i1.25858

Keywords:

Museum Diplomacy, Non-State Actors, Memory Politics, Postcolonial International Relations, Soft Power, Indonesian-Dutch Relations

Abstract

This article analyzes the Revolusi! Indonesia Independent exhibition (2022) at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam as a case study of memory diplomacy, demonstrating how museums function as non-state actors in international relations. The exhibition, which aimed to foster reconciliation between the Netherlands and Indonesia, became the center of controversy over the curatorial treatment of the term Bersiap. The study employed a tripartite framework to examine this case, integrating museum diplomacy, memory politics, and postcolonial International Relations (IR) theory. The first lens highlights museums as cultural actors projecting national identity and contributing to soft power while navigating asymmetrical power relations. The second lens situates the exhibition as an arena of norm contestation, where hegemonic Dutch-Indo victimhood narratives clashed with Indonesian decolonial counter-memories. The third lens interprets the controversy through postcolonial diplomacy, revealing how unresolved colonial legacies complicate bilateral reconciliation. Drawing on qualitative methods, the article argues that the Rijksmuseum became a contested diplomatic arena rather than a neutral space of cultural dialogue. The findings underscore that museums have been deeply embedded in power struggles over identity, soft power, and historical memory, making them critical sites for understanding the intersections of heritage, trauma, and diplomacy in postcolonial international relations.

References

Bachleitner, K. (2023). Memory in international diplomacy (Chapter 7, p. 246–257). In Mälksoo, M., Handbook on the Politics of Memory. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800372535.00034

Bandlien, B. (2013). Hegemonic memory, counter-memory, and struggles for royal power: The rhetoric of the past in the age of King Sverrir Sigurðsson of Norway. Scandinavian Studies, 85(3), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.5406/scanstud.85.3.0355

Beyond Walls. (2023, February 11). Afterlives of revolution. Inside Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.insideindonesia.org/editions/edition-150-oct-dec-2022/afterlives-of-revolution

Bijl, P. (2012). Colonial memory and forgetting in the Netherlands and Indonesia. Journal of Genocide Research, 14(3-4), 441-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2012.719375

Boffey, D. (2022a, February 9). Dutch officials drop case against Rijksmuseum over ‘racist’ word. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/09/dutch-officials-drop-case-against-rijksmuseum-over-racist-word

Boffey, D. (2022b, February 17). Dutch PM apologises for state’s role in abuses in 1940s Indonesian war. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/17/dutch-state-condoned-extreme-violence-in-indonesian-war-inquiry-concludes

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.

Dibbits, T. (2022, January 14). ‘Bersiap blijft, en het Rijksmuseum is niet woke.’ NRC. Retrieved from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2022/01/14/bersiap-blijft-en-het-rijksmuseum-is-niet-woke-a4079333

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789

Greenberger, A. (2022, January 14). Use of the ‘Racist’ term in the Rijksmuseum Indonesia show provokes controversy. Art News. Retrieved from https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/rijksmuseum-indonesia-exhibition-racist-term-controversy-1234615817/

Grincheva, N. (2013). “Psychopower” of cultural diplomacy in the information age. Figueroa Press.

Historia.ID. (2022, March 13). Live tour pameran Revolusi di Rijksmuseum. [@historiadotid]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tugI2F9Nj_s

Hollander, I. (2022, January 25). More Revolusi controversy in the wake of the Rijksmuseum exhibit. The Indo Project. Retrieved from https://theindoproject.org/revolusi-controversy-rijksmuseum/

Janti, N. (2022, February 4). ‘Bersiap’ exposes Dutch-Indonesian historical divide. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from https://www.thejakartapost.com/world/2022/02/03/bersiap-exposes-dutch-indonesian-historical-divide.html

Khoury, N. (2017). Plotting stories after war: Toward a methodology for negotiating identity. European Journal of International Relations, 24(2), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117711743

Kusno, T. A. (2023). Dismantling monuments, decentring narratives: An artistic intervention at the Rijksmuseum. Third Text, 37(4), 435-453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2023.2242194

Macdonald, S. (2009). Difficult heritage: Negotiating the Nazi past in Nuremberg and beyond. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203888667

McGregor, K. (2023, February 11). Review: ‘Revolusi’, an exhibition. Inside Indonesia (Edition 150: Oct–Dec 2022). Retrieved from https://www.insideindonesia.org/editions/edition-150-oct-dec-2022/review-revolusi

Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: Les lieux de mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.

Oosterom, R. (2022, January 11). The bersiap controversy: The Rijksmuseum wants to get rid of the word, Indo-Dutch feel insulted. Trouw. Retrieved from https://historibersama.com/the-bersiap-riot-trouw/

Pamungkas, L., & Koesoemawiria, E. (2022). Revolusi! Indonesië onafhankelijk, by Harm Stevens, Amir Sidharta, Bonnie Triyana, Marion Anker (eds.). Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 178(4), 534–537. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17804011

Priewe, S. (2021). Museum diplomacy: Parsing the global engagement of museums. USC Center on Public Diplomacy, 2(2021). https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/sites/default/files/Museum%20Diplomacy_8.23.21.pdf

Rijksmuseum. (2021, December 15). Revolusi! Indonesië onafhankelijk [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.rijksmuseum.nl/nl/pers/persberichten/revolusi-indonesie-onafhankelijk

Risse, T., Börzel, T. A., & Draude, A. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of governance and limited statehood. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198797203.001.0001

Riyanto, B., Assegaf, A. H., Kurniawan, Y. W., Mawuntu, C., & Aulia, G. R. (2023, April). Forging ASEAN’s cultural identity through digital museum diplomacy (p. 381–386). In Sintowoko, D. A. W., Resmadi, I., Azhar, H., Gumilar, G., & Wahab, T. (Eds.), Sustainable Development in Creative Industries: Embracing Digital Culture for Humanities (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003372486-71

Sastramidjaja, Y. (2023a, February 11). Revolusi revisited. In Inside Indonesia (Edition 150: Oct–Dec 2022). Retrieved from https://www.insideindonesia.org/editions/edition-150-oct-dec-2022/revolusi-revisited

Sastramidjaja, Y. (2023b, February 11). Interview: Bonnie Triyana on history as a movement. Inside Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.insideindonesia.org/editions/edition-150-oct-dec-2022/interview-bonnie-triyana-on-history-as-a-movement

Sending, O. J., & Neumann, I. B. (2006). Governance to governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, states, and power. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00418.x

Seth, S. (2011). Postcolonial theory and the critique of international relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(1), 167-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811412325

Siegal, N. (2022, February 10). Looking back on a colonial struggle, a museum stirs new disputes. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/10/arts/design/rijksmuseum-revolusi-indonesia-independent.html

Smith, M. (2020, March 11). How unique are British attitudes to empire? YouGov. Retrieved from https://yougov.co.uk/international/articles/28355-how-unique-are-british-attitudes-empire

Stevens, H., Sidharta, A., Triyana, B., & Anker, M. (Eds.). (2022). Revolusi! Indonesia independent. Atlas Contact.

Tempo. (2022, February 27). Bonnie Triyana, pameran Revolusi, periode Bersiap, hingga isu ditangkap di Belanda. Tempo. Retrieved from https://www.tempo.co/wawancara/bonnie-triyana-pameran-revolusi-periode-bersiap-hingga-isu-ditangkap-di-belanda-840228

Triyana, B. (2022a, January 10). Schrap de term 'Bersiap', want die is racistisch. NRC. Retrieved from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2022/01/10/schrap-term-bersiap-voor-periodisering-want-die-is-racistisch-a4077367

Universiteit Leiden. (2022, March 17). Curator of the National Museum Marion Anker: ‘History can cause friction’. Retrieved from https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/news/2022/03/curator-of-the-national-museum-marion-anker-history-can-be-very-hurtful

Wirayudha, R. (2022, May 14). Menyesapi cerita-cerita tersembunyi di pameran Revolusi! Historia.id. Retrieved from https://historia.id/kultur/articles/menyesapi-cerita-cerita-tersembunyi-di-pameran-revolusi-vg8gN/page/1

Zarakol, A. (2011). After defeat: How the East learned to live with the West. Cambridge University Press.

Published

2025-09-24

Issue

Section

Articles