Securitizing e-Waste: Framing Environmental Issue as a Threat to Human Security

Fajar Ajie Setiawan, Fitriana Putri Hapsari

Abstract


Isu limbah elektronik (e-waste), sebagai akibat pesatnya perkembangan teknologi elektronik dan sering melihat produk-produk elektronik dari sisi komersial yang terlepas dari siklus akhirnya, mendorong revolusi keberadaan limbah ini sebagai masalah global karena praktik pembuangan dan penggunaan ulang yang diterapkan seringkali tidak mengindahkan bahaya yang mungkin terjadi. Hal ini terutama menjadi perhatian di dunia bagian selatan karena adanya perspektif umum bahwa polusi dan limbah dipandang sebagai “harga” dari proses pembangunan, serta terkait juga dengan pandangan bahwa pengelolaan limbah elektronik adalah praktik yang mahal, sulit, dan tidak praktis serta asumsi bahwa lingkungan dan masyarakat dapat dipertahankan di masa depan, yang dengan demikian menunda upaya-upaya preventif. Kurangnya kesadaran akan permasalahan e-waste dari perhatian publik menimbulkan ancaman pada dimensi keamanan manusia. Artikel ini berargumen bahwa mencegah limbah elektronik menjadi isu keamanan utama dapat memberikan keuntungan dengan melakukan sekuritisasi masalah ini sebagai ancaman terhadap keamanan manusia. Tulisan ini akan dimulai dengan mengidentifikasi isu global tentang limbah elektronik dan bagaimana hal itu dapat membahayakan kesehatan dan keamanan manusia pada umumnya. Kerangka sekuritisasi kemudian akan diimplementasikan dengan menggunakan konsep komprehensif keamanan manusia dalam menjelaskan fenomena e-waste, karena dapat mengeksplorasi ranah normatif politik dan di sisi lain juga melakukan pendekatan dari berbagai sudut pandang, yang memungkinkan pemahaman dan solusi multidimensional.

 

The issue of electronic waste (e-waste), as an effect of the rapid development of electronic technology and often view products from the commercial side regardless of its end-cycle, evolved its existence as a global problem because of the implemented disposal and reuse practices are often not heeding the dangers that may be resulted. This is especially a concern in the global south due to general perspective that pollution and waste is seen as the price of development, which also linked to the view that the management of electronic waste is a costly, difficult, and impractical practice as well as assumption that the environment and society can be maintained in the future. The omission of e-waste issue from public concern raises an impending threat to human security dimension. This paper argues that preventing e-waste from becoming a major security issue may benefit from securitizing the issue as a threat to human security. This paper will start by identifying the global issue of e-waste and how it can harm human’s health and security in general. Securitization framework will then be implemented using the comprehensive concept of human security in explaining the e-waste phenomenon since it explores the normative realm of politics while also a multi-faceted approach, enabling multidimensional understanding and solutions.

 


Keywords


e-waste; sekuritisasi; keamanan manusia; lingkungan; pendekatan konstruktivis; e-waste; securitization; human security; environment; constructivist approach

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acharya, A., 2014. Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), p. 647–659.

Acharya, A., 2014. Human Security. In: The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 448-462.

Akiyama, N., 2004. Human security at the crossroad: human security in the Japanese foreign policy context. In: Conflict and human security: a search for new approaches of peace-building. Hiroshima: IPHSU Research Report Series, pp. 252-270.

Balde, C. P. et. al., 2015. e-waste statistics: Guidelines on classification, reporting and indicators, Bonn: UNU & IAS - SCYCLE.

Baran, P. A., 1959. Reflections and underconsumption. In: The Allocation of Economic Resources: Essays in Honor of Bernard Francis Haley. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 52-64.

Buzan, B., Wæver, O. & de Wilde, J., 1998. Security: A New Framework of Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner.

Commission on Human Security, 2003. Human Security Now, New York: UN.

Cucchiella, F., D’Adamo, I., Koh, S. L. & Rosa, P., 2015. Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 51, pp. 263-272.

Elwood, J. H. & Patashik, E., 1993. In praise of pork. Public Interest, Volume 132, pp. 19-33.

EU, 2003. Directive 2002/96/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) — joint declaration of the European parliament, the council and the commission relating to article 9, s.l.: s.n.

European Council, 1991. Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991, Brussels: s.n.

Gerstl, A., 2010. The Depoliticisation and ‘ASEANisation’ of Counter-Terrorism Policies in South-East Asia: A Weak Trigger for a Fragmented Version of Human Security. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 3(1), pp. 48-75.

Gourlay, K. A., 1992. World of Waste: Dilemmas of Industrial Development. London: Zed Books.

Greenpeace, 2011. Hidden Consequences - The costs of industrial water pollution on people, planet and profit, Amsterdam: Greenpeace International.

Herat, S. & Agamuthu, P., 2012. E-waste: a problem or an opportunity? Review of issues, challenges and solutions in Asian countries. Waste Management & Research, 30(11), pp. 1113-1129.

Hollander, J., 1998. The waste remains and kills. Social research, 65(1), pp. 3-6.

Huisman, J., 2012. Eco-efficiency evaluation of WEEE take-back systems. In: Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment. Oxford: Woodhead Publishing, pp. 93-119.

Kratochwil, F. V., 1989. Rules, norms, and decisions: On the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kuehr, R. & Williams, E. eds., 2003. Computers and the Environment: Understanding and Managing their Impacts. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Lox, F., 1994. Waste Management - Life Cycle Analysis of Packaging, Brussel: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

McKinney, J. B., 1986. Concepts and definitions. In: J. B. McKinney & M. Johnstone, eds. Fraud, Waste and Abuse in Government: Causes, Consequences and Cures. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Institute for the Study of Human Issues, pp. 1-7.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2000. Statement by Mr. Yukio Takasu, Director-General of Multilateral Cooperation Department, at the Third Intellectual Dialogue on Building Asia's Tomorrow. [Online]

Available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/human_secu/speech0006.html

OECD, 1994. Decision of the Council on the Reduction of Transfrontier Movements of Wastes, Paris: OECD.

OECD, 2001. Extended producer responsibility: a guidance manual for governments, Paris: OECD.

Pinto, V. N., 2008. E-waste hazard: The impending challenge. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 12(2), pp. 65-70.

Pongrácz, E., 1998. The Environmental Effects of Packaging, Tampere: Tampere University of Technology.

Pongrácz, E., 2002. Re-defining the Concepts of Waste and Waste Management: Evolving the Theory of Waste Management, Oulu: Oulu University Press.

Pongrácz, E., Phillips, P. S. & Keiski, R. L., 2004. Evolving the Theory of Waste Management: Defining Key Concepts. In: Waste Management and the Environtment II. s.l.:WIT Press, pp. 471-480.

Puckett, J. & Smith, T., 2002. Exporting harm: the high-tech trashing of Asia, Seattle: Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition.

Schluep, M. et. al., 2009. Recycling - from e-waste to resources, Sustainable innovation and technology transfer industrial sector studies, Paris: UNEP.

Schwarzer, S. et. al., 2005. E-waste, the hidden side of IT equipment’s manufacturing and use, Switzerland: UNEP.

Sinha, D., 2004. The management of electronic waste: a comparative study on India and Switzerland, St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen.

StEP Initiative, 2014. One Global Definition of E-waste, Bonn: UNU.

Suhrke, A., 1999. Human Security and the Interests of States. Security Dialogue, 30(3), pp. 265-276.

UNDP, 1994. Human Development Report, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

UNEP, 1989. Basel Convention on the control of transboundary movement of hazardous wastes and their disposal, Nairobi: s.n.

UNEP, 2009. Recycling: From E-Waste to Resources, Berlin: UNEP.

Vallette, J., 1999. Larry Summers' War Against the Earth. [Online]

Available at: https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/212/45462.html

[Accessed 15 April 2017].

Warner, J., 2012. Human Security and the" Double Jump": A Critical Analysis of Electronic Waste in Ghana. Journal of Human Security, 8(1), pp. 4-19.

Wendt, A., 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, Volume 46, p. 391–425.

Widmer, R. et. al., 2005. Global perspectives on e-waste. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 25, pp. 436-458.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.62115

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Hubungan Internasional

 Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Indexed by:

      


Editorial Office of Jurnal Hubungan Internasional 

Ki Bagus Hadikusumo Building, E4, 1st floor, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Jl. Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, 55183, Indonesia
jurnalhi@umy.ac.id ariekusumapaksi@umy.ac.id

 


Jurnal Hubungan Internasional in collaboration with:

   


Creative Commons License   

Jurnal Hubungan Internasional is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

View My Stats