A Systematic Mapping Study: What do We Know about Border Area Issues in International Relations?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.81147Keywords:
border areas, international relations, systematic mapping studyAbstract
Systematic mapping study (SMS) in this article is used to structure a research area and analyzed previous literature in International Relations with a research focus in border areas. The most recent guidelines for systematic mapping were in 2008. Meanwhile, there are needs for researchers including doctoral students to conduct the process of systematic mapping to find out a gap and novelty on research related to border areas. It comprises countries in Europe, America, and Asia, which are still on the limelight of the debates. This article aims to identify how the systematic mapping process is conducted (including search, study selection, analysis, and presentation of data, etc.) and improve potentials in conducting a systematic mapping process and updating the guidelines accordingly. The search was done on Scopus database online. SMS offers an overview and contributions to explore more new subjects in international border areas. It creates a map of current literature and can ensure helpful outcomes in practical use to identify gaps in future research. Researchers can use this study as a reference in conducting International Relations studies especially in developing the topics of border areas.
References
Agbiboa, D. E. (2017). Borders that continue to bother us: the politics of cross-border security cooperation in Africa’s Lake Chad Basin. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 55(4), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2017.1312730
Banaeianjahromi, N., & Smolander, K. (2015). What do we know about the role of enterprise architecture in enterprise integration? A systematic mapping study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 29 No, 140–164. https://doi.org/DOI 10.1108/JEIM-12-2014-0114
Barbosa, O., & Alves, C. (2011). A systematic mapping study on software ecosystems. Proceedings of the Workshop on Software Ecosystems 2011, 15–26.
Bonchuk, O. M. (2011). Cross-border trade: An analysis of trade and market integration along the Nigerian – Cameroon borderlands. J. Nig. St., 1 (2).
Catal, C. & Mishra, D. (2013). Test case prioritization: A systematic mapping study. Software Qualitative Journal, 21, 445-478.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications Inc.
Hansen, N. (1977). Border regions: A critique of spatial theory and a European case study. The Annals of Regional Science.
Jørgensen, M. & Shepperd, M. J. (2007). A systematic review of software development cost estimation studies. IEEE Trans Software Engineering, 33, 1, 33–53.
Kitchenham, B. & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, School of Computer Science & Mathematics, Keele University.
Kitchenham, B. (2007). The current state of evidence-based software engineering. In International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering.
Klatt, M., & Wassenberg, B. (2017). Secondary foreign policy: Can local and regional cross-border cooperation function as a tool for peace-building and reconciliation? Regional and Federal Studies, 27(3), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1350652
Koch, K. (2018). The spatiality of trust in EU external cross-border cooperation. European Planning Studies, 26(3), 591–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1393502
Konrad, V. (2012). Conflating imagination, identity, and affinity in the social construction of borderlands culture between Canada and the United States. American Review of Canadian Studies, 42(4), 530–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/02722011.2012.732096
Mahapatra, D. A. (2017). States, locals and cross-border cooperation in Kashmir: Is secondary foreign policy in making in South Asia? Regional and Federal Studies, 27(3), 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1343721
Nadalutti, E. (2012). Is Cross-Border Governance Emerging over the Border between Italy and Slovenia? Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 20(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2012.685390
Nadalutti, E. (2017). Is cross-border cooperation underpinned by an ethical code of values? A theoretical analysis. Regional and Federal Studies, 27(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1261019
Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776403010002004
Perkmann, M., & Sum, N. L. (2002). Globalization, regionalization and trans-border regions: Scales, discourses and governance. NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan.
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2009). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering.
Princen, S., Geuijen, K., Candel, J., Folgerts, O., & Hooijer, R. (2016). Establishing cross-border co-operation between professional organizations: Police, fire brigades and emergency health services in Dutch border regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(3), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776414522082
Sohn, C. (2014). The border as a resource in the global urban space: A contribution to the cross-border metropolis hypothesis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12071
Sousa, L. De. (2013). Understanding European cross-border cooperation: A framework for analysis. Journal of European Integration, 35(6), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.711827
Topak, Ö. E., Bracken-Roche, C., Saulnier, A., & Lyon, D. (2015). From smart borders to perimeter security: The expansion of digital surveillance at the canadian borders. Geopolitics, 20(4), 880–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1085024
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
License
This journal is based on the work at journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/jhi under license from Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You are free to:
- Share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms, which include the following:
- Attribution. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- Non-Commercial. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- No additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Copyright
The author should be aware that by submitting an article to this journal, the article's copyright will be fully transferred to Jurnal Hubungan Internasional. Authors are allowed to resend their manuscript to other journals or intentionally withdraw the manuscript only if both parties (Jurnal Hubungan Internasional and Authors) have agreed on the issue. Once the manuscript has been published, authors are allowed to use their published article under Jurnal Hubungan Internasional copyrights.
All authors are required to deliver the agreement of license transfer once they submit the manuscript to Jurnal Hubungan Internasional. By signing the agreement, the copyright is attributed to this journal to protect the intellectual material for the authors. Authors are allowed to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium and in any circumstances to give appropriate credit and wide readership to the work.
