PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH PENGGANTI UNDANG-UNDANG OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI

Abstract

Constitutional Court (MK) through Verdict Number 138/PUU-VII/2009 have, conclusion  that authoritative MK to check, to  judging, and breaking application of examination of Regulation of Government of Substitution of Code.  Though  article  24  C  sentence  (1)  Constitution of  Indonesia  State  1945  (III  amendment)  for  example authoritative test  inviter code  to  constitution,  to uphold supremacy of constitution. Assessment  to  regulation of  government of  substitution  of  code  according  to  rule  articles  22  sentence  (2) Constitution of  Indonesia State  1945  conducted  by  Parliament  in  next  conference.This  Research  type  is  research  of  law  of  normative. Approach which utilized in this research is approach of law philosophy, approach of law theory, and constitutional approach. The system based on the Constitution’s attempt to RIS or UUDS,  judicial it does not allow review of product  in the  form of  legislative act because  the product  is a  result of the exercise of  sovereignty,  let alone judicial  review  against  a Perpu.  Similarly a Perpu born based on  the Constitution  of 1945  (original  text) also cannot be done  yudicial  review. After he did  the  amendment to  the Constitution process yudicial review  can be done. Yudicial review against a Perpu can be done, but  the need for the restriction that a Perpu substance should  set  things outside  the  realm of  the  Executive branch  can do  yudicial review.