An Analysis of Product Dimensions Out of Specification as Quality Claim Improvement Activity : Application of 8D Method in the Injection Plastic Industry
Abstract
Every company tries to find ways to maintain its market position in an increasingly competitive business environment. In order to be successful, companies need to achieve their objectives and goals to make their vision a reality while adhering to their mission. Company claims report in the few years still hasn’t solved yet. Such complaints are significant because customer
satisfaction can only be improved if the root causes of the problem is clearly identified. In the plastic industry that produces parts for the automotive industry, a systematic method named 8D is used to analyze product conformity to specifications. The 8D method consists of nine disciplines problem-solving. The original purpose of 8D method was to eliminate the defect causing the problem, thus restoring customer satisfaction and level up the quality level of the company. This research established the suitability of the 8D for complaint settlement. 8D involves teamwork to solve the problem and using a 9-step structural approach. This case study resulted that the 8D is effective. The total customer claims at the end of last year until this year in Dec 2020 totaled zero (0) and process rejection for incorrect dimensions were reduced from 0.07 % to 0.01%.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ehie, I. C. and Sawhney, R. Integrating Six Sigma and Lean Manufacturing for Process Improvement: A Case Study. In Badiru, A. B., Handbook of industrial and systems engineering. CRC Press, ch. 2006. 36:1-36:12.
Carlos A. Riesenberger and Sérgio D. Sousa.The 8D Methodology: An Effective Way to Reduce Recurrence of Customer Complaints?.Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2010. Vol III.
Rambaud, L. 8D Structured Problem Solving: A Guide to Creating High-Quality 8D Reports. Phred Solutions, Breckenridge, CO, USA. 2006.
Bosch, V.G. and Enriquez, F.T.TQM and QFD: exploiting a customer complaint management system. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2005, Vol. 22 No. 1.
Lalit Kumar Biban, Deepak Dhounchak, Shakti. 8D Methodology: From Concept to Application Across Manufacturing Industries. IJSRSET. 2017. Volume 3 Issue 6 Print ISSN: 2395-1990 Online ISSN: 2394-4099.
V. Alexa, I. Kiss. Complaint Analysis Using 8d Method Within The Companies In The Field Of Automotive. Analecta Technica Szegedinensia review of faculty of engineering.2016. Vol. 10, No.1.
Keppmann.Hella 8D Report_ Supplier Training Material. Lippstadt 2017-11-20 HCC-PU-QM
Küster, B. Eilert, B. Overmeyer L. Automated Quality Evaluation of 8D Reports in Context of Complaint Processing. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Automated Systems and Technologies. 2016.Vol. 3. pp. 77-80
Zahrami, A. and Benbow, D. Introduction to 8D Problem Solving: Including Practical Applications and Examples. ASQ Quality Press. Milwaukee, Winsconsin.2017
Marcus Larsson Martin Norén. Assessment and improvement of Volvo Powertrain‟s problem-solving process “Quality Journal” vs. “Six Sigma”. Department of Technology Management and Economics Division of Quality Sciences Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg, Sweden. 2011.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jmpm.v4i2.11358
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Editorial Office :
JMPM (Jurnal Material dan Proses Manufaktur)
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
Jl. Brawijaya Tamantirto Kasihan Bantul 55183 Indonesia
Email: jmpm@umy.ac.id
(62)274-387656 (62)274-387656