Monopoly Analysis of a Limited Liability of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs)

Authors

  • Aris Machmud Law Department, Faculty of Law, University of al Azhar Indonesia, Jakarta http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-1637
  • Djihadul Mubarok Economic and Business Department, Economic and Business Faculty, Muhammadiyah Business Institute
  • Abdul Majid Law Department, Law Faculty, Brawijaya University, Indonesia
  • Nurini Aprilianda Law Department, Law Faculty, Brawijaya University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v3i2.15825

Keywords:

Holding Company, Monopoly, Privatization

Abstract

Monopoly is regulated in the regulation of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) as the right to regulate (bestuur) all state resources as mandated by the constitution of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution and also the BUMN Law Number 19 of 2003 where one of them is a company that is an entity a government-owned business in the form of a limited liability company. The capital is divided into wholly or at least 51 percent of the shares owned by the Republic of Indonesia with the main objective of pursuing profit. In the case of SOEs, corporate actions are determined by the direction of state policies in their economy. Problem formulation based on the above background, is monopolistic and de-monopoly practices against SOEs, inconsistency of the government? This research used normative juridical with a quantitative analytical approach and examines literature studies that conclude. The study results showed that corporate action was not doubt or inconsistency in implementing a state monopoly. However, this holding was to increase the capacity and existence of SOEs as agents of development and the state in managing resources related to many people’s lives.

References

Anggoro, T. (2020). Monopoli & BUMN. Retrieved from https://kppu.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Materi-TeddyAnggoro-MonopoliBUMN.pdf

ANT. (2016). KPPU: Banyak Kebijakan Pemerintah Muluskan Monopoli. Retrieved from hukumonline.com website: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kppu--banyak-kebijakan-pemerintah-muluskan-monopoli-lt582dabf0e432c

Bergsager, H., & Korppoo, A. (2013). China’s State-Owned Enterprises as Climate Policy Actors. Copenhagen. https://doi.org/10.6027/TN2013-527

Coşar, B., Yilmaz, H., & Altindağ, E. (2019). The Role of State‐Owned Enterprises in an Artificial Monopoly Market: The Case of Turkey. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 78(5), 1171–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12299

FHC/ESP. (2022). Menyikapi Monopoli dan Dominasi BUMN. Retrieved from uii.ac.id website: https://www.uii.ac.id/menyikapi-monopoli-dan-dominasi-bumn/

Islami, T. A. (2019). Penetapan Standardisasi Harga oleh Asosiasi Pelaku Usaha (Trade Association) dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. IRTIFAQ: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Syariah, 6(2).

Lubis, A. F., Anggraini, A. M. T., Toha, K., Kagramanto, L. B., Hawin, M., Sirait, N. N., … Silalahi, U. (2009). Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Teks & Konteks (A. F. Lubis & N. N. Sirait, Eds.). Indonesia: GTZ KPPU.

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2018). Arrangment on Officially Supported Export Credits. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=TAD/PG(2018)1&docLanguage=En

Permadi, I. B. K. B., & Sukranatha, A. . K. (2015). Konsep Rule of Reason untuk Mengetaui Praktek Monopoli. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 3(3), 1–6.

Rangkuti, P., Syamsah, T. ., & Yani, A. (2019). Praktek Larangan Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Pada Bank Pemerintah Dalam Memberikan Fasilitas Subsidi Perumahan. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 11(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.30997/jill.v11i2.2112

Samawati, P. (2018). Monopoli BUMN dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Malang: Tunggal Mandiri.

Shanghai Daily. (2013). Experts Call for Break-up of SOE Monopoly. Shanghai Daily. Retrieved from http://www.china.org.cn/business/2013-05/29/content_28964295.htm

Sipayung, J. F., Nasution, B., & Siregar, M. (2013). Tinjauan Yuridis Holdingisasi BUMN dalam Rangka Peningkatan Kinera menurut Perspektif Hukum Perusahaan. TRANSPARENCY, 1(1).

Sirait, N. N. (2006). Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Persaingan Internasional. Medan: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sumatera Utara. Retrieved from https://repository.usu.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/20527/ppgb_2006_ningrum_natasya_sirait.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y

Songmin, G. (2013). China’s SOE Monopoly Fallacy. Retrieved from china.org.cn website: http://www.china.org.cn/opinion/2013-06/03/content_29010446.htm

Suartini, S., & Syafrizal, S. (2021). Al-Ghazali on Social Welfare: In Search of its Relevance in the Context of Village Owned Enterprise. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 21(1), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v21i1.647

Susanto, V. Y. (2020). KPPU minta pemerintah perjelas pengecualian monopoli bagi BUMN. Retrieved from Kontan.co.id website: https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/kppu-minta-pemerintah-perjelas-pengecualian-monopoli-bagi-bumn

Tanaya, P. E. (2016). Divestasi sebagai Alternatif Mempertahankan Viabilitas Perekonomian Indonesia (Dari Perspektif Economic Analysis of Law). Jurnal Advokasi, 6(2), 231–246.

Tjokrowasito, M. (2009). Kebijakan Persaingan Pada Industri Jasa Penerbangan. Jakarta: BAPPENAS.

Wareza, M. (2021). Holding Ultra Mikro Disebut Bakal Monopoli, Ini Kata Erick. Retrieved from CNBC Indonesia website: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20210318174211-17-231235/holding-ultra-mikro-disebut-bakal-monopoli-ini-kata-erick

Regulation

Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 3 Tahun 2010 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Ketentuan Pasal 51 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. (2010).

Presiden Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2016 tentang Percepatan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Ketenagalistrikan. (2016). Republic of Indonesia: Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 8.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-30

Issue

Section

Article