About the Journal

 

FOCUS AND SCOPE

Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab is a peer-reviewed journal focuses on Arabic education in the world. This journal is published by Program Study of Arabic Education, Faculty of Languages Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. Editors welcome scholars, researchers and academicians who have concern on Arabic Education to submit scholarly articles to be published through this journal. All articles will be reviewed by experts before accepted for publication. Each author is solely responsible for the content of published articles.

This journal encompasses original research articles, review articles, and short communications, including:

  • Teaching Arabic as a Foreign Language
  • Arabic Linguistic
  • Arabic Literature
  • Arabic History
  • History of Arabic Education
  • Strategy of Arabic Teaching
  • Arabic Islamic Culture
  • Media of Arabic Teaching
  • Technology of Arabic Teaching
  • Modern Standard Arabic
  • Arabic Second Language Acquisition
  • Arab Islamic History

 

 

PUBLICATION ETHICS

Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab puts attention on the publication ethics. Therefore, it is important to spread the information about this thing to the whole parties involved in this publication matter including the authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher itself. It aims to prevent such publication malpractice and copyright abuse. It is in accordance with our effort in giving the right code of conduct in the academics publication. Based on the Core Practices presented by COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics), we share the duties of authors, editors, reviewers, and publisher that should be obeyed (https://publicationethics.org/core-practices/)

Duties of Authors

Authors have the obligation to submit the original article. It means that the paper should not be published elsewhere before. The paper’s status is not under review/editing on other journals. It will be considered as an unethical action if the authors submit a paper which is still in review/editing process on other journals.

The data of the research should be presented properly without any acts of data falsification and fabrication.  It is important that the authors have to present the research data accurately. The citation of other works should be done properly. Authors should pay attention on how to cite other people’s works so that it will not be considered as a plagiarism act.

To prevent the dispute regarding the paper publication, it is suggested that authors check the final manuscript before it is published on the journal. If the authors want to retract the paper, it is suggested to contact the journal’s editorial team right before the journal’s publication schedule.

Authors often use the human being as the participant of the research so it is suggested that the authors keep the confidential data of research participants. It is important not to exposure the confidential data of the research participants as a way of preventing legal dispute.

Duties of Reviewers

As a consultant for the journal, reviewers have such vital role in determining whether the paper is accepted or rejected on the journal. Reviewers or often called as referee have to give the constructive feedback to the authors about what should be improved in the paper.

The reviewers should be able to show some sections of the paper that needs to be polished for the better quality. By giving the clear statement or comments in the paper, reviewers have helped the editors in the process of decision making for the paper’s progress. It is a must for the reviewers to conduct the review process objectively. Personal criticism on the paper should be avoided.

If the reviewers feel that they are not capable enough in reviewing particular paper due to the different specialty they have, reviewers should contact the editors. It is a must for the reviewers to keep the confidential review process of a paper.

Reviewers should give competing interest declaration before accepting the review request from the editors. It is a way of preventing such conflict of interest in the paper publication on this journal.

Duties of Editors

Editors have the wide responsibilities in the publication matters. Initial screening of the paper should be done by the Editor-in-Chief to determine whether the article fits for the journal or not. Later, the Section editor who is appointed by the Editor-in-Chief has to choose the right reviewer for the paper.

It is a must for the editors to assess the paper based on its content not to be based on the religion, race, gender, citizenship, or political views of the authors. Editors are required to have such good decision making abilities for the paper publication on the journal.

In the process of editing the paper, the editor should be able to keep the confidential data of the paper and not getting advantage of it. Checking the originality of the paper is the main responsibility of the editors. Contacting the author regarding the paper’s progress is another editor task.

Duties of Publisher

The role of the journal or the publisher is giving the access for authors in publishing their academic works. The journal or the publisher must be able to ensure the authors’ intellectual rights on their works. The process of revision and retraction of a paper should be facilitated well by the journal or the publisher. Journal or publisher should be able to provide the access of scientific dissemination for academic works.  

 

COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE

Copyright Notice

Please find the rights and licenses in Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab. By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. 

  1. License

The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

  1. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before elsewhere. It contains no unlawful statements, their co-authors authorize them to enter into these arrangements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

  1. User/Public Rights

Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab has a spirit to disseminate the published articles as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, the journal permits users to copy, distribute, display, remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose. Users will also need to attribute authors and Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab to distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  1. Rights of Authors

Authors retain their rights to the published works, in these following rights;

Authors hold the copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
Authors hold the right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
Authors hold the right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
Authors posess the right to self-archive the article or upload it on the author's social media account or website with the link to the journal.

5. Co-Authorship

If more than one author jointly prepared the article, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab will only communicate with the corresponding author.

 

  1. Miscellaneous

Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is completed. The journal editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that seems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published to be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers.

 

 

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

All manuscripts submitted to Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab are subjected to a thorough screening and review process to ensure that they fit within the scope of the journal and are of sufficient academic quality and novelty to appeal to the journal's readership. The journal uses double-blind peer review, which conceals the identities of both the author(s) and the reviewers.

 

Initial Screening. A newly submitted manuscript will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief to ensure that it meets the scope and basic submission requirements of Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab.

 

Peer-review. If the manuscript passes the preliminary screening, it will be assigned to a handling editor, who will then send it to at least two experts in the relevant field for double-blind peer review. Manuscripts that do not pass the preliminary screening will be rejected without further consideration.

 

First Decision. A decision on a peer-reviewed manuscript will be made only after at least two review reports have been received. At this point, a manuscript can be rejected, asked for minor or major revisions, accepted, or recommended for resubmission for a second review process (if significant changes to the language or content are required). If the manuscript is accepted, it will be returned to the submitting author for formatting. The Editor-in-Chief will make the final decision to accept or reject the manuscript based on the recommendation of the handling editor and approval by the board of editors.

 

Stage of revision. A manuscript that needs to be revised will be returned to the submitting author, who will have up to three weeks to format and revise it before it is reviewed by the handling editor. The handling editor will decide whether the changes are adequate and appropriate, as well as whether the author(s) responded sufficiently to the reviewers' comments and suggestions. If the revisions are deemed insufficient, the cycle will be repeated (the manuscript will be returned to the submitting author once more for further revision).

 

Stage of final decision. The revised manuscript will be accepted or rejected at this point. This decision is based on whether the handling editor believes the manuscript has been improved to the point where it is publishable. The manuscript will be rejected if the author(s) are unable to make the required changes or have done so in a manner that falls short of Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab's standards.

 

Estimation time for the duration of peer review process until the manuscript getting accepted in this journal: 12 weeks

 

 

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative

  

Budapest Open Access Initiative

 An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge.

For various reasons, this kind of free and unrestricted online availability, which we will call open access, has so far been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible, that it gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and that it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibility, readership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will all enjoy the benefits of open access.

The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

While  the peer-reviewed journal literature should be accessible online without cost to readers, it is not costless to produce. However, experiments show that the overall costs of providing open access to this literature are far lower than the costs of traditional forms of dissemination. With such an opportunity to save money and expand the scope of dissemination at the same time, there is today a strong incentive for professional associations, universities, libraries, foundations, and others to embrace open access as a means of advancing their missions. Achieving open access will require new cost recovery models and financing mechanisms, but the significantly lower overall cost of dissemination is a reason to be confident that the goal is attainable and not merely preferable or utopian.

To achieve open access to scholarly journal literature, we recommend two complementary strategies. 

  1. Self-Archiving: First, scholars need the tools and assistanceto deposit their refereed journal articles in open electronic archives, a practice commonly called, self-archiving. When these archives conform to standards created by the Open Archives Initiative, then search engines and other tools can treat the separate archives as one. Users then need not know which archives exist or where they are located in order to find and make use of their contents.
  2. Open-access Journals: Second, scholars need the means to launch a new generation of journals committed to open access, and to help existing journals that elect to make the transition to open access. Because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible, these new journals will no longer invoke copyright to restrict access to and use of the material they publish. Instead they will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent open access to all the articles they publish. Because price is a barrier to access, these new journals will not charge subscription or access fees, and will turn to other methods for covering their expenses. There are many alternative sources of funds for this purpose, including the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of journals charging traditional subscription or access fees, or even contributions from the researchers themselves. There is no need to favor one of these solutions over the others for all disciplines or nations, and no need to stop looking for other, creative alternatives.


Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature is the goal. Self-archiving (I.) and a new generation of open-access journals (II.) are the ways to attain this goal. They are not only direct and effective means to this end, they are within the reach of scholars themselves, immediately, and need not wait on changes brought about by markets or legislation. While we endorse the two strategies just outlined, we also encourage experimentation with further ways to make the transition from the present methods of dissemination to open access. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation to local circumstances are the best ways to assure that progress in diverse settings will be rapid, secure, and long-lived.

The Open Society Institute, the foundation network founded by philanthropist George Soros, is committed to providing initial help and funding to realize this goal. It will use its resources and influence to extend and promote institutional self-archiving, to launch new open-access journals, and to help an open-access journal system become economically self-sustaining. While the Open Society Institute's commitment and resources are substantial, this initiative is very much in need of other organizations to lend their effort and resources.

We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars who share our vision to join us in the task of removing the barriers to open access and building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are that much more free to flourish.

February 14, 2002
Budapest, Hungary

Leslie Chan: Bioline International
Darius Cuplinskas: Director, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Michael Eisen: Public Library of Science
Fred Friend: Director Scholarly Communication, University College London
Yana Genova: Next Page Foundation
Jean-Claude Guédon: University of Montreal
Melissa Hagemann: Program Officer, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Stevan Harnad: Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Southampton, Universite du Quebec a Montreal
Rick Johnson: Director, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC)
Rima Kupryte: Open Society Institute
Manfredi La Manna: Electronic Society for Social Scientists 
István Rév: Open Society Institute, Open Society Archives
Monika Segbert: eIFL Project consultant 
Sidnei de Souza: Informatics Director at CRIA, Bioline International
Peter Suber: Professor of Philosophy, Earlham College & The Free Online Scholarship Newsletter
Jan Velterop: Publisher, BioMed Central

 

 

PLAGIARISM POLICY

Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab applies Zero tolerance towards plagiarism and therefore establishes the following policy stating specific actions (pending the publication) when plagiarism is identified in an article that is submitted for publication in this journal.

Definition: Plagiarism involves the "use or close imitation of the language and thoughts of another author and the representation of them as one's own original work."

Policy: Papers must be original, unpublished, and not pending publication elsewhere. Any material taken verbatim from another source needs to be clearly identified as different from the present original text by (1) indentation, (2) use of quotation marks, and (3) identification of the source.

Any text of an amount exceeding fair use standards (herein defined as more than two or three sentences or the equivalent thereof) or any graphic material reproduced from another source requires permission from the copyright holder and, if feasible, the original author(s) and also requires identification of the source; e.g., previous publication.

All submitted manuscripts will be checked of their similarity by Turnitin.

When plagiarism is detected, the Editor in-Chief is responsible for the review of this paper and will agree on measures according to the extent of plagiarism detected in the paper in agreement with the following guidelines:

 Similarity level

Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab practices Zero tolerance towards plagiarism. We use Turnitin to evaluate the similarity index and then the editor decides the case of possible plagiarism (Similarity report will be provided to the author). Editorial board has passed the following actions:
1. Similarity Index above 40%: Article Rejected (due to poor citation and/or poor paraphrasing, article outright rejected, NO RESUBMISSION accepted).
2. Similarity Index (20-40%): Sent back to the author for improvement (provide correct citations to all places of similarity and do a good paraphrasing even if the citation is provided).
3. Similarity index equal or Less than 20%:  Accepted or citation improvement may be required (proper citations must be provided to all outsourced texts).
In case no. 2: the author(s) should revise the article carefully, add required citations, and do a good paraphrasing to the cited text.

Every manuscript that submitted into Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab will be scanned for its similiarity by using Turnitin.

 

 

R-W-C-R-R POLICY

We understand that the authors have worked carefully in preparing manuscripts, and we have carried out peer-review processes. However, sometimes there is the potential for published articles to be withdrawn or even deleted for scientific reasons. It should not be done lightly and can only occur under extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies when needed will be carried out with strict standards to maintain confidence in the authority of its electronic archives. It is our commitment and policy to maintain the integrity and completeness of important scientific records for researchers and librarians’ archives.

Article Retraction

Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab is committed to keep its responsibility in maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record, therefore on occasion, it is necessary to retract articles. Articles may be retracted if:

  • There is major scientific error that would invalidate the conclusions of the article, for example where there is clear evidence that findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error).
  • The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission, or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication).
  • There are ethical issues such as plagiarism (appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit including those obtained through confidential review of others' manuscripts) or inappropriate authorship.

In order to ensure that retractions are handled according to publication best practice, and in accordance with COPE retraction guidelines, Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab adopts the following retraction process:

  • An article requiring potential retraction is brought to the attention of the journal editor.
  • The journal editor should follow the step-by-step guidelines according to the COPE flowcharts (including evaluating a response from the author of the article in question).
  • Before any action is taken, the editor's findings should be sent to the Advisory Editor in Chief.
  • The final decision as to whether to retract is then communicated to the author and, if necessary, any other relevant bodies, such as the author's institution on occasion.
  • The retraction statement is then posted online and published in the next available issue of the journal. 

Note that if authors retain copyright for an article this does not mean they automatically have the right to retract it after publication. The integrity of the published scientific record is of paramount importance and COPE’s Retraction Guidelines still apply in such cases.

Article Withdrawal

The authors are strongly requested not to withdraw the paper that is being processed at Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab because the withdrawal is a waste of valuable resources that editors and referees spent a great deal of time processing submitted manuscripts and works invested by the publisher. For attention, before the author submits the manuscript through our OJS, the author is obliged to approve the checklist that we provide.

  • If the authors request the withdrawal of their manuscript when the manuscript is still in the peer-reviewing process, the authors would be banned to submit their manuscript to Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab one year after the withdrawal date.
  • If the manuscript's withdrawal after the manuscript is accepted for publication, the authors would be banned to submit their manuscript to Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab two years after the withdrawal date.
  • The authors who do not submit revised manuscripts after the manuscript is "accepted" to publish either with minor or major revision and does not make a confirmation for a long period of time, the editor may punish that the authors have made a withdrawal after the manuscript is accepted.

Article Correction

Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab should consider issuing a correction if:

  • A small part of an otherwise reliable publication reports flawed data or proves to be misleading, especially if this is the result of honest error.
  • The Author or Contributor list is incorrect (e.g. a deserving Author has been omitted or someone who does not meet authorship criteria has been included).

Corrections to peer-reviewed content fall into one of three categories:

  • Publisher correction (erratum): to notify readers of an important error made by publishing/journal staff (usually a production error) that has a negative impact on the publication record or the scientific integrity of the article, or on the reputation of the Authors or the journal.
  • Author correction (corrigendum): to notify readers of an important error made by the Authors which has a negative impact on the publication record or the scientific integrity of the article, or on the reputation of the Authors or the journal.
  • Addendum: an addition to the article by its Authors to explain inconsistencies, to expand the existing work, or otherwise explain or update the information in the main work.

The decision whether a correction should be issued is made by the Editor(s) of a journal, sometimes with advice from Reviewers or Editorial Board members. Handling Editors will contact the Authors of the paper concerned with a request for clarification, but the final decision about whether a correction is required and if so which type rests with the Editors.

Article Removal

In an extremely limited number of cases, it may be necessary to remove a published article from our online platform. This will only happen if an article is clearly defamatory, or infringes others’ legal rights, or where the article is, or we have good reason to expect that it will be, the subject of a court order, or where the article, if acted upon, may pose a serious health risk. In such circumstances, while the metadata (i.e. title and author information) of the article will be retained, the text will be replaced with a screen indicating that the article has been removed for legal reasons.

Article Replacement

In cases where an article, if acted upon, may pose a serious health risk, the Authors of the original paper may wish to retract the flawed original and replace it with a corrected version. Under such circumstances, the above procedures for retraction will be followed with the difference that the article retraction notice will contain a link to the corrected re-published article together with a history of the document.

 

 

ARTICLE PROCESSING CHARGE

Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab is an open access journal supported by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. There is no subscription fees. It does not charge readers or institutes for access. If the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author (s) will be asked to pay an article publication fee to cover the publication costs.

 

Article publication fees (Starts from April 2023 issue):

  • Author from Indonesia: IDR 400.000, -
  • Author from Other Countries: USD 40