Classroom Activities in Content and Language Integrated Learning

Authors

  • Evi Puspitasari English Education Department, Faculty of Language Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.129

Keywords:

Content and Language Integrated Learning, CLIL, classroom activities, students' responses

Abstract

Abstract

Content and Language Integrated Learning is an approach used to teach subjects which focus on learning a new language and content. This approach is usually implemented to teach content through a target language. In an English training program in Indonesia, this approach is applied by using English as a medium of instruction to teach concepts and theory-based subjects. Since the students should accomplish the target language and concepts of pedagogy, they need activities to assist them in the dual-focused process. This research is going to scrutinize what activities are implemented in the program to achieve the learning goal. By interviewing four sophomore students who enrolled two content subjects in semester three, the data were gained. Four classroom activities used were revealed. Those were quiz, group presentation, group teaching and classroom discussion. Students’ responses toward each activity were good. However, some notes regarding teachers’ decision and roles were addressed. It proved a teacher is a factor that brings the CLIL activities into success or failure.

 Keywords: Content and Language Integrated Learning, CLIL, classroom activities, students’ responses

Author Biography

Evi Puspitasari, English Education Department, Faculty of Language Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

She is interested in Material Development, Material Evaluation and Teaching English as a Foreign Language. She is now teaching in English Education Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta (UMY).

References

References

Alavinia, P. & Sehat, R. A Probe into the main demotivating factors among Iranian EFL learners. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 5, 9-35.

Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. A. (2001). Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204.

Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011). The Effectiveness of Feedback for L1-English and L2-Writing Development: A Meta-Analysis. (ETS Research Report RR-11-05). Princeton, NJ: ETS.

Cenoz, J. (2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: the same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum 28(1), 8-24.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?

Dalton-Puffer, C., Huttner, J., Jexenflicker, S., Schindelegger, V., & Smit, U. (2008). Content and language integrated learning an Osterreichs Hoheren Technischen Lehranstalten. Forschungsbericht. Vienna, Austria: Universitat Wien & Bundesministerium fur Unterricht, Kultur und Kunst.

Eurydice Network. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: Retrieved from http://eacea.ec.europa. eu/education/eurydice/thematic_studies_archives_en.php

Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., & Chen, C. C. (2012). An online game approach for improving students' learning performance in web-based problem-solving activities. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1246-1256.

Jack, R.& Rodgers, T. (2001). Approaches and method in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jones, B.D., Ruff, C., Snyder, J.D., Petrich, B., & Koonce, C. (2012). The Effects of Mind Mapping Activities on Students' Motivation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 1-21.

Kuyper, H., van der Werf, M.P.C., & Lubbers, M.J. (2000). Motivation, meta-cognition and self-regulation as predictors of long term educational attainment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(3), 181–201.

Maillat, D. (2010). The pragmatics of L2 in CLIL. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL (pp. 39–60). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Nikula, T. (2010). On effects of CLIL on a teacher’s language use. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 105–124). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Richards, J. C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, T. (2011). Developing first-year students’ critical thinking skills. Asian Social Science, 7, 26-35.

Tomlinson, B. (2011). Material development in language teaching. Edinburg: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.129

Downloads

Published

2018-05-26

How to Cite

Puspitasari, E. (2018). Classroom Activities in Content and Language Integrated Learning. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.129

Issue

Section

Articles