The Use of Web 2.0 Tools for Learning in EFL Context: Pre-service Teachers’ Voice
Abstract
Information and communication technology (ICT) has always been evolving, and its advancement has affected every aspect of human life, including education. As future teachers, pre-service teachers need to be aware of this development and have to be able to follow suit by learning how to utilize the technology for their teaching and learning processes. In English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context, Web 2.0 tools have been widely used since they provide opportunities for the users to have interaction and collaboration with other people from around the world, and, thus, open the opportunity to global learning. Therefore, this research aims to explore the Web 2.0 tools that have been employed by the pre-service teachers, and it also aims to examine the benefits they perceived in applying some of the Web 2.0 tools for their learning process in the EFL context. The results of the research show that there are five types of Web 2.0 tools that the pre-service teachers used, namely video sharing platforms, social networking tools, social photo tools, blogs, and game-based learning platforms. Concerning the benefits of using Web 2.0 tools in the learning process in the EFL context, the pre-service teachers stated that they could help them to find information more easily, allow them to collaborate with other people, enhance their language skills, and increase their motivation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The internet and higher education, 11(2), 71-80.
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (Indonesian Internet Service Providers Association). (2018). [Infographic from survey results]. Penetrasi & Perilaku Pengguna Internet Indonesia Survey 2017. Retrieved from https://apjii.or.id/survei2017
Aşıksoy, G. (2018). ELT students’ attitudes and awareness towards the use of WEB 2.0 technologies for language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 240-251.
Balbay, S., & Erkan, G. (2018). Perceptions of Instructors on Using Web 2.0 Tools in Academic English Courses. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 45-60.
Barbara N., & Linda B., (2013). Changing academic teaching with Web 2.0 technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(3), 315-325. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2013.796727
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Cochrane, T. D. (2014). Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile Web 2.0. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 65-8.
Eren, Ö. (2012). Students' attitudes towards using social networking in foreign language classes: A Facebook example. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(20), 288-294.
Faizi, R. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions towards using Web 2.0 in language learning and teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1219-1230.
Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational researcher, 38(4), 246-259.
Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: theory and empirical tests. Journal of computing in higher education, 21(3), 183-198.
Huffman, K. (2017). Web 2.0: Beyond the concept practical ways to implement RSS, podcasts, and Wikis. Education Libraries, 29(1), 12-19.
Keleş, U. (2013). The perceptions of ELT students about the use of Web 2.0 tools, particularly wikis, in their future language classrooms (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Bilkent University.
Kızıl, A. Ş. (2017). Exploring EFL learners' use of Web 2.0 tools: Preliminary findings. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 27, 28-40.
O'Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Communications & Strategies, 65(1), 17-37.
Rahimi, E., van den Berg, J., & Veen, W. (2015). Facilitating student-driven constructing of learning environments using Web 2.0 personal learning environments. Computers & Education, 81, 235-246.
Riyanto, A. (2019). [Infographic from survey results]. Hootsuite (We are Social): Indonesian Digital Report 2019. Retrieved from https://andi.link/hootsuite-we-are-social-indonesian-digital-report-2019/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.4243
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Mariska Intan Sari
Address
Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning
KH. Ibrahim Building (E6), 1st Floor, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Jalan Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Yogyakarta, 55183
Phone: +62 274 387656, ext. 447
Email: journalfltl@gmail.com
E-ISSN: 2580-2070
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.