Prefectural System Practices in The Indonesian Local Government
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the implementation of the prefectural system in Indonesia, examining its historical development, current application, and future trajectory in regional governance. This study employs a qualitative research design, utilizing a case study approach across several provinces in Indonesia. Data collection involved in-depth interviews, document analysis, and field observations to capture the nuances of the prefectural system's operation within different regional contexts. The prefectural system in Indonesia originated with the enactment of regional government laws and became more prominent after the New Order. It involves dividing the national territory into smaller administrative regions, with governors representing the central government, and features both deconcentration and decentralization. While previous studies have focused on decentralization and autonomy, this research highlights how these processes reinforce the prefectural system. This study provides fresh insights into the prefectural system's evolving role in Indonesia's decentralized governance. Unlike earlier works, it examines how the system balances central and local powers, anticipating its growing importance as Indonesia refines its decentralization policies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adnan, H. R., Hidayanto, A. N., & Kurnia, S. (2021). Citizens’ or Government’s Will? Exploration of Why Indonesia’s Local Governments Adopt Technologies for Open Government. Sustainability, 13(20), 11197. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011197
Aritenang, A. F. (2020). The effect of intergovernmental transfers on infrastructure spending in Indonesia. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 25(3), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2019.1675352
Bjørnå, H., & Jenssen, S. (2006). Prefectoral Systems and Central?Local Government Relations in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29(4), 308–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00154.x
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston, MA, US: Allyn and Bacon. Retrieved from https://www.worldcat.org/title/qualitative-research-for-education-an-introduction-to-theory-and-methods/oclc/7614601
Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (2015). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. (M. DeVault, Ed.) (4th ed.). New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Introduction+to+Qualitative+Research+Methods%3A+A+Guidebook+and+Resource%2C+4th+Edition-p-9781118767214
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. California: SAGE.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://edge.sagepub.com/creswellrd5e
Firman, T. (2009). Decentralization Reform and Local‐Government Proliferation in Indonesia: Towards a Fragmentation of Regional Development. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 21(2–3), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-940X.2010.00165.x
Firman, T. (2014). Inter-local-government partnership for urban management in decentralizing Indonesia: from below or above? Kartamantul (Greater Yogyakarta) and Jabodetabek (Greater Jakarta) compared. Space and Polity, 18(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2014.959252
Fried, R. C. (1963). The Italian Prefects: A Study in Administrative Politics. New Haven, CT, USA. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/Italian-Prefects-Administrative-Politics-Political/dp/B0007EBSBE#detailBullets_feature_div
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing Paradigm in Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). New York, NY, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1994-98625-005
He, B., Wang, J., Wang, J., & Wang, K. (2018). The Impact of Government Competition on Regional R&D Efficiency: Does Legal Environment Matter in China’s Innovation System? Sustainability, 10(12), 4401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124401
He, Z., Zhao, C., Fürst, C., & Hersperger, A. M. (2021). Closer to causality: How effective is spatial planning in governing built-up land expansion in Fujian Province, China? Land Use Policy, 108, 105562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105562
Hoekstra, A., Huberts, L., & van Montfort, A. (2023). Content and Design of Integrity Systems: Evaluating Integrity Systems in Local Government. Public Integrity, 25(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.2014204
Ichimura, S., & Arimoto, Y. (2019). Decentralization, the prefectural system, and local governance in Japan. In Handbook of Research on Sub-National Governance and Development (1st ed., pp. 334–354). Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/environmental-governance-and-decentralisation-9781847203984.html
Kie, S. (2020). Institutional analysis of regionalism in Japan: a sociological case study from Owase, Japan. Japan Forum, 32(2), 284–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09555803.2019.1626471
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-97407-000
Moleong, J. L. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology (8th ed.). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Retrieved from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=1133305
Onitsuka, K., & Hoshino, S. (2018). Inter-community networks of rural leaders and key people: Case study on a rural revitalization program in Kyoto Prefecture, Japan. Journal of Rural Studies, 61, 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.04.008
Ovsiannikov, K. (2017). Corporate Governance Reforms in Japan: Instilling the New Regime. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1300993. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1300993
Pinson, G., & Morel Journel, C. (2016). Beyond Neoliberal Imposition: State–Local Cooperation and the Blending of Social and Economic Objectives in French Urban Development Corporations. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(2), 173–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1153512
Purwanto, E. A., & Pramusinto, A. (2018). Decentralization and functional assignment in Indonesia: the case of health and education services. Policy Studies, 39(6), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1530413
Rahayu, P., Woltjer, J., & Firman, T. (2021). Shared water resources in decentralized city regions: mixed governance arrangements in Indonesia. Urban Water Journal, 18(9), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2021.1931358
Ridley, F. F. (1973). Integrated Decentralization: Models of the Prefectoral System. Political Studies, 21(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1973.tb01414.x
Rizzo, C., Guido, G., Pino, G., Pirotti, T., & Anzilli, L. (2022). A fuzzy expert system for sustainable local development. Regional Studies, 56(5), 808–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1959908
Sarkar, M. S. K., Okitasari, M., Ahsan, M. R., & Al-Amin, A. Q. (2022). Localisation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Bangladesh: An Inclusive Framework under Local Governments. Sustainability, 14(17), 10817. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710817
Shoesmith, D., Franklin, N., & Hidayat, R. (2020). Decentralised Governance in Indonesia’s Disadvantaged Regions: A Critique of the Underperforming Model of Local Governance in Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(3), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420963140
Sousa, D. (2014). Validation in Qualitative Research: General Aspects and Specificities of the Descriptive Phenomenological Method. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.853855
Sutiyono, W., Pramusinto, A., & Prasojo, E. (2018). Introduction to the mini special issue: understanding governance in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 39(6), 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1530416
Suzuki, K., & Han, Y. (2019). Does citizen participation affect municipal performance? Electoral competition and fiscal performance in Japan. Public Money & Management, 39(4), 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1558554
Winarna, J., Muhtar, M., Sutaryo, S., & Amidjaya, P. G. (2021). Government Internal Control System and Local Government Administration Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Local Governments. Pénzügyi Szemle = Public Finance Quarterly, 66(Special edition 2021/2), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.35551/PFQ_2021_s_2_5
Wong, S. W., Tang, B., Liu, J., Liang, M., & Ho, W. K. O. (2021). From “decentralization of governance” to “governance of decentralization”: Reassessing income inequality in periurban China. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(6), 1473–1489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20988013
Yarram, S. R., Tran, C. T. D., & Dollery, B. E. (2022). Administrative intensity in local government: Do administrative scale economies exist in New South Wales local government? Politics & Policy, 50(3), 562–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12467
Yin, R. K. (2012). Case Study Research. Design and Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23279888
Zhang, J., & Yan, W. (2022). The Economic Impact of Public Capital: Evidence from Chinese Prefectures and Firms. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 97, 103818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2022.103818
Zhang, L., Wang, H., Zhang, W., Wang, C., Bao, M., Liang, T., & Liu, K. (2022). Study on the development patterns of ecological civilization construction in China: An empirical analysis of 324 prefectural cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367, 132975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132975
Zou, K., & He, J. (2018). Intra-Provincial Financial Disparity, Economic Disparity, and Regional Development in China: Evidence from Prefecture-Level City Data. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(13), 3064–3080. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1364236
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i3.20224
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Governance and Public Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Office:
Master of Government Affairs and Administration (MIP)
Postgraduate Building 2nd Floor UMY
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 173)
Jl. Brawijaya, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.