Agenda Setting dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Perbatasan di Kepri Tahun 2015

Eki Darmawan, Achmad Nurmandi

Abstract


Bondary not only separate territories that are owned by different communities or countries but also ensure the safety
and well-being balanced between each area concerned. Riau Islands Province is leading directly adjacent to neighboring
countries such as Malaysia, Singapore, the Philippines, and Thailand. Conditions islands region in Riau (Riau
Islands) are very much separated by an ocean, the area is 252 601 km2 area consisting of 1,350 islands and 96%
Ocean thus making control range of the government in development planning very difficult. This study will look at how
the government’s Agenda Setting in the border area development planning Riau Islands, which will discuss the issue
and political currents flow in the policy agenda to the policies made by the government of Riau islands as border
regions.The method used in this study is qualitative. The study was conducted in Regional Development Planning
Board (Bappeda) Riau Islands Province, the Regional Border Management Agency (BNPPD) Riau Islands Province
and Commission III of the House of Representatives (DPRD) Riau Islands Province. Data collection techniques performed
in this study were interviews, collecting data document written and unwritten, and non-participant observation.
Results from this study is the first, the flow of matter to explain the issues and problems that occur on the border
of Riau Islands namely the problem of limited infrastructure such as facilities and infrastructure such as facilities and
infrastructure of housing, education, health, security, and also facilities and transport infrastructure, telecommunications,
and Other causes of this region have low accessibility and isolated from the surrounding region. Secondly, the
flow of Politics explains the policy process and then view and objectives to be achieved still has a perception about the
construction of the border is still different, the level of public participation, NGOs, academics and NGOs are still
relatively low, the handling is still partial, sectoral and yet integritasi, coordination has not gone good, both among
sectoral, national level and between the central government and local governments, commitment and development
budget in the border area is still relatively minimal. Third, Flow Policy describes several emerging priorities namely,
development of processing industry, fishery and tourism in a sustainable manner in order to support the sector of
maritime, increasing production and agricultural productivity, as well as self-reliance and food security community,
Improved connectivity between regions and between the island and the means and basic infrastructure of society,
Improving the quality of the environment and forestry, natural disaster mitigation and climate change, peningatan
quality human resources and well-being equitable and civilized society, Improving the quality of public services and
good governance.


Keywords


Agenda Setting, Planning Development, Border

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v2i3.2131

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Government and Public Policy



 


Office: 
Master of Government Affairs and Administration (MIP)
Postgraduate Building 2nd Floor UMY

Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 173)

Jl. Brawijaya, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.