Treatment of Anterior Crossbite with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion during the Growth Period

Tita Ratya Utari

Abstract


Anterior crossbite is the most common problem in Angle class III malocclusion and is aesthetically disturbing. As individuals get older, an anterior crossbite can worsen, impacting the esthetics of the face and the stomatognathic system’s function significantly and requiring immediate treatment. Due to genetics, habitual postures, ethnicity, and environmental variables, the class III malocclusion’s etiology is multifaceted. In terms of treatment, there are three options: growth modification, camouflage, and orthognathic surgical treatment. This case report aims to describe a non-surgical treatment with simple treatment mechanics in two patients who were still in their growth period. Two patients, a sibling aged 14 and 13 years, experienced an anterior crossbite with a deep overbite, diagnosed with Angle class III with skeletal class III relationships. Besides, the profile revealed a concave, with an overjet of -2mm and an overbite of 4mm. The treatments were then performed employing fixed orthodontic appliances with vertical U-loops for protraction of upper anterior teeth and class III intermaxillary elastics to correct molar relationships. The treatment was completed in two years, in which the anterior crossbite was corrected. The molar and canine relationships, which were originally class III, became class I. Loss of tooth 36 was closed, and tooth 38 has fully erupted. Treatment of anterior crossbite needed to be done as soon as possible to prevent more severe abnormalities. In conclusion, a treatment in the growth period with simple techniques resulted in significant improvements in function and aesthetics.

Keywords


anterior crossbite; class III; fixed orthodontics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Yashwant AV, Rajasekaran UB, Xavier HR, James L, Joseph B. Camouflage Treatment of Skeletal Class III Malocclusion with Anterior Crossbite in Adults: A Case Series. Int J Sci Stud. 2019;7(1):213-218.

Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th Ed. St. Louis, MO, Elsevier Mosby, 2013.

Gawthanman M, Disha P, Mathian V, Vinodh S. A fixed Partial Appliance approach towards treatment of anterior single tooth crossbite: report of two cases. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences.2017.9(2):119-121. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJDS.IJDS_19_17

Reyes A, Serret L, Peguero M, Tanaka O. Diagnosis and Treatment of Pseudo-Class III Malocclusion. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2014. 2014:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/652936

Zere E, Chaudhari PK, Sharan J, Dhingra K, Tiwari N. Developing Class III malocclusions: challenges and solutions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018; 10:99-116, https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S134303

Meeran NA. Correction of anterior crossbite and an unesthetic smile arc in an adult patient. Journal of clinical orthodontics: JCO. 2011.45: 31-37.

Yang C, Tseng YC.The Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion with Anterior Cross Bite and Severe Deep Bite. Taiwanese Journal of Orthodontics. 2020.31(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.30036/TJO.201903_31(1).0006

Mokhtar KI, Bakar AB, Tahir AHBMA. Genetics of malocclusion: A review. IIUM Journal of Orofacial and Health Sciences. 2020.1(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijohs.v1i1.2

Oltramari-Navarro PV, de Almeida RR, Conti AC, Navarro Rde L, de Almeida MR, Fernandes LS. Early treatment protocol for skeletal Class III malocclusion. Braz Dent J. 2013;24(2):167-173. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201301588

Sakoda KLS, Pinzan A, Cury SEN, Bellini-Pereira SA, Castillo AAD, Janson G. Class III malocclusion camouflage treatment in adults: A Systematic Review. Journal of Dentistry Open Access. 2019.1(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.31487/j.JDOA.2019.01.04

Alam MK, Nowrin SA, Shahid F, AlHarby H, Abutayyem H, Alswairki HJ, El-Din Mohamed SK. Orthognathic versus Camouflage Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2022,12:3314. https://doi.org/10.3390/ app12073314

Krishna V, Sivakumar A, Indumathi S, Sam PM, Padmapriya CV. Treatment of 3-prong anterior crossbite and unilateral lingual posterior crossbite malocclusion in an adolescent boy. J Indian Orthod Soc 2017;51:284-288. https://doi.org/10.4103/jios.jios_268_16

Utari TR. Perawatan Maloklusi Klas III Dento-Skeletal Pada Masa Pertumbuhan Menggunakan Alat Cekat (Straight Wire Appliance) (Laporan Kasus). Insisiva Dental Journal: Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Insisiva, 2016;5(1):24-32. https://doi.org/10.18196/di.v5i1.3711

Vineet G, Pooja S. Correction of a Skeletal Class III with Anterior Cross Bite using Maxillary Protraction Therapy. JSM Dent. 2014;2(2): 1028.

Mitchell L. An introduction to orthodontics. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. p. 179–192.

Mai W, He J, Meng H, Jiang Y, Huang C, Li M, Yuan K, Kang N. Comparison of vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2014;145(6):720–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.019




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/di.v11i1.14133

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Insisiva Dental Journal: Majalah Kedokteran Gigi Insisiva are indexed by:

 

Office:

Gedung Siti Walidah F3 4th Floor, Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Phone: +62 274 387656 Ext.217
Email: jurnalkgumy@gmail.com
Website: http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/di/index

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0) International license.