Centering Ability and Canal Transportation of Three Reciprocal Files in Moderately Curved Canals

Authors

  • Indra Kanujaya Postgraduate Student of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Trisakti, Kampus B – Jl. Kyai Tapa 260 Grogol, Jakarta, 11440, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3647-0488
  • Wiena Widyastuti Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Trisakti, Kampus B – Jl. Kyai Tapa 260 Grogol, Jakarta, 11440, Indonesia
  • Anastasia Elsa Prahasti Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Trisakti, Kampus B – Jl. Kyai Tapa 260 Grogol, Jakarta, 11440, Indonesia
  • Johan Arief Budiman Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Trisakti, Kampus B – Jl. Kyai Tapa 260 Grogol, Jakarta, 11440, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/di.v14i1.25807

Keywords:

Canal centering, canal transportation, curved canals, reciproc

Abstract

Assessing the complexity of the root canal’s curvature is one of the crucial factors for the root canal procedure to succeed. Iatrogenic complications can happen during the shaping procedure of the curved canal as it can deviate from the original anatomy, such as transportation and ledge. Therefore, maintaining the initial anatomy of the root canal’s curvature and its centering during instrumentation is essential during the shaping procedure. This ex vivo study aims to analyze the centering ability and canal transportation of three reciprocal file systems, with and without a glide path in moderately curved canals. Thirty-six root canals with moderate curvature from freshly extracted maxillary premolar with separated buccal and palatal root canals, first maxillary molar with separated mesiobuccal and distobuccal canals, and first mandibular molar with separated mesial canals were selected then distributed into six random groups (n=6) according to with and without glide path procedure (#15 K-file) before instrumentation with different reciprocal system (GP+WOG, GP+R, GP+RB, NGP+WOG, NGP+R, NGP+RB). The centering ability and transportation were evaluated by CBCT both before and after instrumentation. One-way Analysis of Variances was employed to analyze the data. (p<0.05).  There were significant differences in centering ability at the middle third (p<0.05) and transportation at the apical third and middle third (p<0.05). All techniques showed certain transportation, and none of them had perfect centering ability. Reciproc Blue had better canal centering and transportation compared to Reciproc when glide paths were used prior to instrumentation. All systems can shape the curved canal without iatrogenic complications.

References

Abu Haimed A, Abuhaimed T, Dummer P, Bryant S. The root canal shaping ability of WaveOne and Reciproc versus ProTaper Universal and Mtwo rotary NiTi systems. Saudi Endod J. 2017;7(1):8-15. https://scienceon.kisti.re.kr/srch/selectPORSrchArticle.do?cn=NART130320798

Wang L, Wang Z, Wang Q, Han J, Tian H. The analysis of root canal curvature and direction of maxillary lateral incisors by using cone-beam computed tomography. Medicine. 2022;101(1):e28393. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35029884/

Kaddoura R, Madarati AA, Tayyan M Al. Shaping ability of different single-file rotary systems in simulated S-shaped canals by a new investigation approach: An in vitro study. Saudi Endod J. 2021;11(2):173-180. https://journals.lww.com/senj/fulltext/2021/11020/shaping_ability_of_different_single_file_rotary.7.aspx

Elashiry MM, Saber SE, Elashry SH. Comparison of Shaping Ability of Different Single-File Systems Using Microcomputed Tomography. Eur J Dent. 2020;14(1):70-76. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32005040/

Shahnaz N, Aasim AK, Shah F, Aijaz H. Management of Maxillary Second Premolar with an S-Shaped Root Canal - An Endondontic Challenge.; 2015. www.iaimjournal.com. https://www.iaimjournal.com/storage/2015/05/36-Management-of-a-maxillary.pdf

Orel L, Velea-Barta OA, Sinescu C, et al. Comparative Assessment of the Shaping Ability of Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and ProTaper Gold in Simulated Root Canals. Materials. 2022;15(9). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35591361/

Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Shaping Ability of Reciproc, WaveOne GOLD, and HyFlex EDM Single-file Systems in Simulated S-shaped Canals. J Endod. 2017;43(5):805-809. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28292599/

Alsilani R, Jadu F, Bogari DF, Jan AM, Alhazzazi TY. Single file reciprocating systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature: Comparison of reciproc and WaveOne. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016;6(5):402-409. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27891305/

Keskin C, Demiral M, Sarıyılmaz E. Comparison of the shaping ability of novel thermally treated reciprocating instruments. Restor Dent Endod. 2018;43(2). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29765896/

Silva PF, Coelho E, Alves N chagas carvalho, Silva S andrade, Pereira fabio cavalcanti, Albuquerque DS. Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold and ProTaper Next in Simulated Curved Canals. Iran Endod J. 2018;13(4):498-502. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36883021/

Vorster M, van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F. Canal Transportation and Centering Ability of WaveOne Gold in Combination with and without Different Glide Path Techniques. J Endod. 2018;44(9):1430-1435. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30078574/

Cassim I, van der Vyver PJ. The importance of glide path preparation in endodontics: a consideration of instruments and literature. SADJ. 2013;68(7):322, 324-327. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24133951/

De Carvalho GM, Sponchiado Junior EC, Garrido ADB, Lia RCC, Roberti Garcia LDF, Franco Marques AA. Apical Transportation, Centering Ability, and Cleaning Effectiveness of Reciprocating Single-file System Associated with Different Glide Path Techniques. J Endod. 2015;41(12):2045-2049. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26472675/

Bartols A, Robra BP, Walther W. The ability of Reciproc instruments to reach full working length without glide path preparation: a clinical retrospective study. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3583. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28804693/

Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971;32(2):271-275. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5284110/

Gambill JM, Alder M, Del Rio CE. Comparison of Nickel-Titanium and Stainless Steel Hand-File Instrumentation Using Computed Tomography. J Endod. 1996;22(7). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8935064/

Sakkir N, Thaha KA, Nair MG, Joseph S, Christalin R. Management of dilacerated and s-shaped root canals - An endodontist’s challenge. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(6). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25121072/

Maia Filho EM, dos Reis Santos RM, Lima DM, et al. Shaping ability of proTaper next, waveOne, and reciproc in simulated root canals. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2016;17(11):902-906. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27965498/

Goldberg M, Dahan S, Machtou P. Centering Ability and Influence of Experience When Using WaveOne Single-File Technique in Simulated Canals. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:1-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23118749/

El Hage W. Canal transportation and centering ability of Reciproc and Reciproc Blue with or without use of pathfinding instruments. Eur Endod J. Published online 2019. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32766521/

Biasillo V, Castagnola R, Colangeli M, et al. Comparison of shaping ability of the Reciproc Blue and One Curve with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals. Restor Dent Endod. 2022;47(1). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36578274/

Zhang L, Luo H xia, Zhou X dong, Tan H, Huang D ming. The Shaping Effect of the Combination of Two Rotary Nickel-Titanium Instruments in Simulated S-Shaped Canals. J Endod. 2008;34(4):456-458. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18358896/

roshdy nehal, AbdelWahed A. Shaping ability of WaveOne Gold and Reciproc Blue with and without the use of glide path in curved canals: A CBCT study. Egypt Dent J. 2022;68(1):1073-1081. https://journals.ekb.eg/article_218754.html

Vorster M, van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F. Influence of Glide Path Preparation on the Canal Shaping Times of WaveOne Gold in Curved Mandibular Molar Canals. J Endod. 2018;44(5):853-855. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29550012/

Susantio C, Widyastuti W, Prahasti A, Amtha R. Differences in Preparation Results of Two Reciprocal Ni-Ti Files with and Without Glide Path to the Changes on Root Canal Curvature. Sci Dent J. 2021;5(2):84. https://doaj.org/article/b525b17d766e4c6da6a2e6d70315196f

West JD. The endodontic Glidepath: “Secret to rotary safety”. Dent Today. 2010;29(9):86, 88, 90-93.

Coelho MS, Fontana CE, Kato AS, De Martin AS, Da Silveira Bueno CE. Effects of glide path on the centering ability and preparation time of two reciprocating instruments. Iran Endod J. 2016;11(1):33-37. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26843875/

Belladonna FG, Carvalho MS, Cavalcante DM, et al. Micro–computed Tomography Shaping Ability Assessment of the New Blue Thermal Treated Reciproc Instrument. J Endod. 2018;44(7):1146-1150. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29861067/

Kataia MM, Roshdy NN, Nagy MM. Comparative analysis of canal transportation using reciproc blue and wavo one gold in simulated root canals using different kinematics. Future Dental Journal. 2018;4(2):156-159. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314718018300302

Fan B, Wu M, Wesselink PR. Leakage along warm gutta‐percha fillings in the apical canals of curved roots. Dental Traumatology. 2000;16(1):29-33. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016001029.x

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

Issue

Section

Articles