KEBIJAKAN LUAR NEGERI DAN KEMAKMURAN EKONOMI
Abstract
A foreign policy of a nation determined by policy capacity. The policy capacity indicators include: a) they whom related in decision making which try to develop national consensus about a goal and a way to reach the goal, focuses systematic understanding in policy making process, avoid doubtful in taking the policy; b) focuses a patience in waiting for results; c) look at other countries which are not as a unity; d) continuously increase policy capacity.
As developing country, the Indonesia‘s foreign policy was become a tool for increasing welfare. A measure of success in Indonesia‘s foreign policy have to be linked to achievements of Indonesia’s welfare during the government’s period. The president’s ability in increasing policy capacity and bargaining is vital. In other words, foreign policy by economic approach is real practice by sharpening vision continuously to get a better result.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bantarto Bandoro, “Democracy and Foreign Policy: Outlook for 2005,” The Jakarta Post, 30 Desember 2004.
Davis B. Bobrow and Steve Chan, “Understanding Anomalous Successes: Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea,” dalam buku, New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, diedit oleh Charles E Herman, Charles W. Kegley Jr., JamesN. Rosenau, Boston: Allen & Unwin Inc., 1987, hal 111.
George A. Lopez and Michael S. Stohl, International Relations: Contemporary Theory and Practice, Washington D.C., Congressional Quarterly Press, 1989, hal. 5.
Hadi Soesastro, “Indonesia’s Evolving Foreign Policy and ASEAN Leadership,” USINDO Open Forum, Washington D.C., April 22, 2003.
Hans J. Morgenthau, Politik Antar Bangsa, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. 1990, hal. 41.
John Funston, “Malaysia: Developmental State Challenged,” dalam Government and Politics in Southeast Asia, John Funston (ed), Singapore: Institute of southeast Asian Studies, 2001, hal. 170
Joseph Chin Yong Liow,” Malaysia-China Relations in the 1990s: The Maturing of a Partnership,” Asian Survey (July/August 2000), hal. 674.
Jerel Rosati and Stephen Twing, “The Presidency and U.S. Foreign Policy after the Cold War,” dalam James M. Scott, Making U.S. Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War World, Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1998, hal. 38
K.J. Hoisti, “The Comparative Analysis of Foreign Policy: Some Notes on the Pitfalls and Paths to Theory,” dalam buku The Political Economy of Foreign Policy in Southeast Asia, diedit oleh David Wurfel dan Bruce Burton, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, The Macmillan Press, Ltd, 1990, hal. 13-14.
Lee H. Hamilton, “A Democract Looks At Foreign Policy,” Foreign Policy (Summer 1992), hal. 36.
Stanley B. Greenberg,”The Mythology of Centrism: Why Clinton and Blair Really Won? The American Prospect, (September 1 — October 1, 1997).
Referensi terkait:
http ://www. df at. goy. aulaib/australia_foreign_trade_policy. html
http://www.kln.gov.my/englishlforeignaffairs/foreignpolicy/myforeign.htm
http://www.worldpress.org/
Kompas, 20 Mei 2005.
The Jakarta Post, 6 Oktober 2003.
The Jakarta Post, Economic Outlook 2005.
The Jakarta Post, 23 Pebruari 2005
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 JESP: Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Office:
Redaksi JESP UMY, Gedung E2 Lantai 2, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Jalan Brawijaya, Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55183
Telp: (0274) 387656 ext.184
Fax: (0274) 387646
Email: jesp@umy.ac.id
Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan (JESP) is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International.