About the Journal

Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis invites study analysts, academicians, and practitioners of business and management to submit research-based manuscripts on various themes, topics, and aspects of management and business, including:

1. Marketing Management

2. Financial and Banking Management

3. Human Resources Management

4. Operation Management & Management of Information System

5. Entrepreneurship

 

Statement

Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis (ISSN: 2086-8200 (print) and 2622-6308 (online)) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal published by Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta in collaboration with the Association of Management Department of Muhammadiyah Universities (APSMA PTM). The journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against publication malpractice. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties included in the act of publishing the manuscripts in the journal, including the authors, the Principal Editors, the Associate Editors, the Editorial Board, the Reviewers, and the Publishers. The statement is based on the Best Practice Guidelines of COPE for Journal Editors. The responsibility of the journal is to publish original work of value to the intellectual community in the best possible form and to the highest possible standards. Similar standards are expected from the Reviewers and authors. Honesty, originality, and fair dealing on the part of the authors, as well as fairness, objectivity, and confidentiality on the part of the Editors and the Reviewers, are among the critical values that enable the journal to achieve its goal. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis is committed to following best practices on ethical matters, errors, and retractions, and also provides a legal review when necessary.

Duties of the Editors

Publication Decisions

The Editors of Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis ensure that the submitted manuscripts considered for publication are subjected to peer review by at least two reviewers who are experts in the field. Furthermore, the Principal Editors are responsible for deciding which of the manuscripts submitted to the journal will be published. This decision is based on the validation of the work in question, the importance to study analysts and readers, the comments of Reviewers, and adherence to legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The Editors may confer with other Editors or Reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play

The Editors evaluate the submitted manuscripts exclusively based on academic merit, such as importance, originality, validity of the study, and clarity. The submitted manuscripts may also be based on their relevance to the scope of the journal, without regard to the race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, religious belief, and political or institutional affiliation of the authors. Decisions to edit and publish are not determined by the policies of governments or any other agencies outside of the journal itself. The Principal Editors have full authority over the entire editorial content of the journal and the timing of publication.

Confidentiality

The Editors and any Editorial Staff must not disclose any information about the submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the corresponding authors, the Reviewers, the Potential Reviewers, other Editorial Advisers, and the Publishers, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

The Editors will not use unpublished information disclosed in the submitted manuscripts for personal study purposes without the explicit consent of the authors. Privileged information or ideas obtained by the Editors as a result of handling the manuscripts are kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Furthermore, the Editors are to abstain from considering manuscripts in which they conflict of interest arises due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships/connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the manuscript. In such instances, they will delegate the responsibility of handling the manuscripts to another member of the Editorial Board.

Management of Unethical Behavior

The Editors and the Publishers should take rationally responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented regarding the submitted or published manuscript. Every reported act of unethical publishing behavior will be examined, even when it is discovered years after publication.

Duties of Authors

Reporting Standards

The authors of the original manuscripts should present an accurate account of the work performed and the results, followed by an objective discussion of the significance of the work. The manuscripts should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Reviewed manuscripts should be accurate, objective, and comprehensive, while editorial ‘opinion’ or perspective pieces should be identified. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

The authors are requested to provide the raw data in connection with the manuscripts for editorial review. Furthermore, the authors should be prepared to provide public access, and in any case, be prepared to retain the data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure the work written is entirely original, and appropriately cite or quote the work of others used. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'passing off' another person manuscript as their own, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts (without attribution), to claiming results from investigations conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Each manuscript will be checked using a plagiarism checker () to ensure its originality. Furthermore, each submitted manuscript should be accompanied by a letter of statement from the authors stating that it is free from plagiarism.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

Manuscripts describing essentially the same study should not be published in more than one journal or primary publication. Therefore, authors should not submit for consideration manuscripts that have already been published in another journal. Submission of the manuscripts concurrently to more than one journal is unethical publishing behavior and unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Authors should ensure that they have properly acknowledged the work of others, and should also cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, either from conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. The authors should not use information obtained in the course of providing confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications unless they have obtained the explicit written permission of the authors of the work.

Authorship of the Manuscripts

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Any individual who contributed significantly to specific aspects of the project should be acknowledged or listed as a contributor. The corresponding authors should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the manuscripts and have agreed to the submission for publication.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works

When the authors discover a significant error or inaccuracy in the published work, the Journal Editors or the Publisher should be notified, and cooperation should be ensured to retract or correct the manuscripts. In a case where the Editors or the Publishers learn from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, the authors must promptly retract or correct the manuscripts or provide evidence to the Editors of the correctness of the original manuscript.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

In a study that includes chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in the use, the authors must clearly identify these elements in the manuscripts. Similarly, when the work uses animal or human subjects, the authors should ensure that the manuscripts contain a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and have been approved by the appropriate institutional committees. The authors should include a statement in the manuscripts that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed. For human subjects, the authors should ensure that the work described has been carried out in accordance with The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Declaration of Competing Interests

The authors should disclose in the manuscripts any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could be viewed as inappropriately influencing (bias) the work. Furthermore, all sources of financial support for the conduct of the study and preparation should be fully disclosed. This includes elucidating the role of the sponsors, if any, in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, report writing, and the decision to submit the manuscripts for publication. In cases where the funding sources had no involvement, the information should be stated. The authors must declare competing interests in the manuscript template.

Image Integrity

Enhancing, obscuring, moving, removing, or introducing a specific feature within an image is not acceptable. Adjustments of brightness, contrast, or color balance are acceptable as long as no information present in the original was obscured or eliminated. Manipulating images for improved clarity is accepted, but could be seen as scientific ethical abuse for other purposes and will be dealt with accordingly. The authors should comply with any specific policy for graphical images applied by the relevant journal, for example, providing the original images as supplementary material with the manuscripts, or depositing these in a suitable repository.

Duties of the Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The process of peer review assists the Editors in making editorial decisions. Additionally, the editorial communications with the authors may also assist in improving the manuscripts.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the subject reported in the manuscripts or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editors and be excused from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents and must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the Editors.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively and personal criticism of the authors is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. Furthermore, Reviewers should call to the attention of the Editors any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscripts under consideration and other published manuscripts of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers are allowed to refrain from evaluating manuscripts in cases where conflicts of interest arise from competition, other relationships, or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the manuscript.

 

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis is an open-access journal indicating that all content is freely available without charge to users or institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full-text manuscripts in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the authors. This is in accordance with the Budapest Open Access Initiative.

 

The selection process for manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis is conducted through a double-blind peer review, considering two main aspects: the relevance to the journal’s scope and its contribution to management theory and practical development. Editors provide constructive feedback throughout the process.

Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers who are not part of the journal’s editorial board. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis strictly maintains impartiality by assigning different individuals as editors and reviewers for the same manuscript. This journal also adheres to COPE guidelines to ensure ethical and transparent publication practices.

The entire review process typically takes 6 to 12 weeks, depending on the availability and responsiveness of reviewers. Authors may follow up via email at mabis@umy.ac.id if there is no update after a reasonable period.

Review Stages

1. Submission
   Manuscripts must be submitted exclusively through the journal's submission system at https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/mb.
2. Initial Check
   Submitted manuscripts are checked for formatting compliance, language clarity, and alignment with the journal’s scope. Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements will be returned for correction or recommended for submission to another journal.
3. Plagiarism Screening
   All manuscripts undergo a similarity check using Turnitin. Manuscripts with a similarity index above 20% may be rejected during the desk review phase.
4. Editorial Evaluation
   Manuscripts that pass the plagiarism check are reviewed by the editorial team to assess their scientific contribution and relevance to current business and management issues. Qualified manuscripts proceed to peer review.
5. Peer Review
   At least two independent reviewers are assigned to evaluate each manuscript. They provide recommendations (accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject). Final decisions are made by the Editor and Editor-in-Chief, taking into account the reviewers' input.
6. Revision
   Authors are given 4 weeks to revise the manuscript. Extension requests must be sent via email to mabis@umy.ac.id. Failure to respond within the timeframe will be considered as withdrawal of the submission.
7. Final Decision & Publication
   Once accepted, the manuscript will be scheduled for publication in the assigned issue, as determined by the Editor-in-Chief. Authors may request a specific issue (volume and number) by email, but placement is not guaranteed.
8.  

 

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off the compliance of submission with all of the following items:

1. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis accepts manuscripts from results in management, business, and entrepreneurship.
2. The manuscripts sent to Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis should be original works. The implication is that the same must have not been published or accepted for publication in any other journals/books either in full or substantial part. Furthermore, it must not be submitted to any other journal for concurrent publication, being considered for publication, or even being reviewed.
3. The manuscripts are written in English, with the name of the authors, institutional affiliation, and e-mail address.
4. The manuscripts must comply with the following guidelines and should be formatted in accordance with Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis. Any manuscript that does not comply with this requirement may be returned for revision (format/template) before entering the review process.
5. The manuscripts only could be sent through the open journal system (OJS) mechanism in the web address: http://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/mb
6. The Editors of Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis reserve the right to edit the grammar and spelling of the text contained without reducing or changing the intent of the writing.

AUTHOR GUIDELINES

STANDARD REPORTING

Authors should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Furthermore, underlying data should be represented accurately in the manuscript. The manuscripts should contain sufficient detail and references to permit replication by others. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

The submitted manuscript to Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis should be written in English, must be original contributions, and should not be under consideration for any other publication at the same time. The manuscripts must be submitted electronically in MS Word according to the prescribed format that you can download on this link. Furthermore, manuscripts must be typed written single-spaced, and with ample margins, and all pages (including those containing any diagrams and tables) must be numbered consecutively.

EXCLUSIVITY OF WORK

The authors should ensure that the work written is entirely original, and cite or quote the work or words of others appropriately. Plagiarism takes many forms, from ‘passing off’ another manuscript as theirs, to copying or paraphrasing substantial parts (without attribution), to claiming results from the study conducted by others. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. The authors should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same study in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, the authors should not submit for consideration in another journal a previously published manuscript. For publication consideration, conference papers are eligible when they constitute an extended and include at least 30% of new material.

AUTHORSHIP OF THE PAPER

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported work. Therefore, all those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Any individual who has participated in certain substantive aspects of the project should be acknowledged or listed as a contributor. The corresponding authors should ensure that all appropriate and inappropriate co-authors are included in the manuscripts and have seen and approved the final version as well as agreed to its submission for publication. 

PLAGIARISM

The manuscripts must represent original contributions and should not be under consideration for any other publications. Furthermore, ensure that the similarity index does not exceed 15% excluding references.

MANUSCRIPT TOPIC

The topics and aspects of management and business include:

1. Marketing Management

2. Financial and Banking Management

3. Human Resource Management

4. Operation Management & Management of Information System 

5. Entrepreneurship

MANUSCRIPT PREPARATION

a. Abstract

An abstract is written in English with a maximum of 250 words and should be clear, giving a short description of the problem being studied. It consists of Study aims, Design/Methodology/Approach, Findings, Theoretical contribution/Originality, Practitioner/Policy implication, and Limitation/Implication.

Keywords: Written in 1 line with a minimum and maximum of 3 and 6 words, respectively.

b. Language

The authors are expected to follow the principles of sound technical writing. The manuscripts that do not meet acceptable English standards or lack clarity may be rejected. Furthermore, the authors whose native language is not English may wish to collaborate with a colleague whose English skills are more advanced.

c. Content

The content of the manuscripts must contain Introduction, Literature Review and Hypotheses Development, Method, Result and Discussion, Conclusion, Appendix (Optional), and References. 

d. Section Formatting (Heading and Sub Heading)

The heading of each section should be typed on a separate line using the appropriate style and must be numbered sequentially. Paragraphs that immediately follow a section heading are leading paragraphs and should not be indented, according to standard publishing style. This is similar to the leading paragraphs of subsections and sub-subsections. In the MS Word template, the Body Text style should be used for leading paragraphs and the Body Text Indented style for all subsequent paragraphs.

e. References

The references should contain the sources referred to in the study and must be written using Harvard style. It is recommended for the authors to write using citation software, such as Mendeley, endNote, Zotero, and others. The examples are provided below.

Journal Article:

Agu, S. U., Okwo, I. M., Ugwunta, O. D., & Idike, A. (2014). Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth in Nigeria: Emphasis on Various Components of Public Expenditure. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics, and Management Studies, 2(12), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.12816/0006800

Magazine Article:

Schaefer, N. K., & Shapiro, B. (2019, September 6). New middle chapter in the story of human evolution. Science, 365(6457), 981–982. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3550

Schulman, M. (2019, September 9). Superfans: A love story. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/09/16/superfans-a-love-story

Newspaper Article:

Carey, B. (2019, March 22). Can we get better at forgetting? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/22/health/memory-forgetting-psychology.html

Whole Book:

Rabinowitz, F. E. (2019). Deepening group psychotherapy with men: Stories and insights for the journey. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000132-000

Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Books.

Edited Book Chapter:

Aron, L., Botella, M., & Lubart, T. (2019). Culinary arts: Talent and their development. In R. F. Subotnik, P. Olszewski-Kubilius, & F. C. Worrell (Eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into domain-specific talent (pp. 345–359). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000120-016

Government Report:

National Cancer Institute. (2019). Taking time: Support for people with cancer (NIH Publication No. 18-2059). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. https://www.cancer.gov/publications/patient-education/takingtime.pdf

Webpage on a Website:

Fagan, J. (2019, March 25). Nursing clinical brain. OER Commons. Retrieved September 17, 2019, from https://www.oercommons.org/authoring/53029-nursing-clinical-brain/view

Table and Figure

The table title is numbered and written at the top of the table, accompanied by the source (if any).

Table 1 Result of test t equation 3

Coefficientsa
Model		Unstandardized Coefficients		Standardized Coefficients	t	Sig.
		B	Std. Error	Beta
1	(Constant)	2.638	1.386		1.904	0.060
	Leadership	0.696	0.054	0.790	12.771	0.000
a. Dependent Variable: job satisfaction

 

Figure 1 Conceptual Model

Copyright