Pengaruh Konflik Peran Terhadap Kinerja Dengan Self Efficacy Sebagai Variabel Moderasi
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the influence of Role Conflict on Performance with Self Efficacy as a Moderation on the set of Variables the student Department of the Faculty of Economics and Business of Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta (HIMAMA, HIMA and HIMIE). The population or a sample that is used is the caretaker and the third member of the organization which amounted to 156. The data used in this research is the primary data collected through the distribution of questionnaires to our respondents. Analysis of testing data using validity and reliability testing, regression and moderated regression analysis, and test the assumptions of the classical test of normality, multikolonieritas, and heteroskedastisidas. The results showed a negative effect and role conflict significantly to the performance of the organization means that the higher role conflict occurs then the performance is declining. Meanwhile, self efficacy are able to moderate the influence of role conflict on performance where self efficacy are positive and significant effect on performance of the organization. This means the higher self efficacy which belonged to someone then its performance will be better and is able to dampen the conflict of roles.
Article Details
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate the changes made. This should be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your usage.
- ShareAlike — When you remix, transform, or build upon the material, the contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Al Azhar L, 2013, “Pengaruh Konflik Peran, Ketidakjelasan Peran, Kesan Ketidakpastian Lingkungan, Locus of Control dan Motivasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Auditor”, Jurnal Ekonomi, Volume 21, Nomor 4.
Catherina Rosally dan Yulius Jogi, 2015, “Pengaruh Konflik Peran, Ketidakjelasan Peran dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Auditor”, Business Accounting Review, Volume 3 No 2, Universitas Kristen Petra.
Gibson, J. L., et all., 2003, Organizations: Behavior Structure Processes, Edisi kedelapan, Cetakan kesebelas, McGraw-Hill Companies Inc, Singapore.
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., dan Donelly, J. H., 1996, Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi kedelapan, Jilid satu, Binarupa Aksara, Jakarta.
Hellriegel dan Slocum, 2004, Organizations Behavior, Edisi kesepuluh, Cetakan pertama, South-Western, Canada.
Heri Setiawan dan Murphin J Sumbring, 2013, “Pengaruh Konflik Peran dan Stres Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai, di Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Tulungagung”, Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Revitalisasi, Volume 2, Nomor 4.
Luthans, F., 2004, Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Kesepuluh, ANDI, Jakarta.
Rivai dan Basri, 2005, Performance Appraisal, Cetakan pertama, Edisi pertama, PT.Raja Grafindo, Jakarta.
Robbins, S., 2003, Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Indonesia, PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta.
Tjahjono, H.K. 2004. Budaya Organisasional dan Balanced Scorecard: Dimensi Teori dan Praktik. UPFE UMY
Umam, 2010, Performance Appraisal, Edisi Kedua, Cetakan Pertama, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Vanda H., 2012, “Pengaruh Tekanan Peran terhadap Kinerja Akuntan Publik yang Dimoderasi oleh Self Efficacy di Kantor Akuntan Publik”, Skripsi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.