An Analysis of Work Discipline, Work Environment and Employment Satisfaction Towards Performance
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to determine whether work discipline, work environment, and job satisfaction have a real and significant impact on the performance of the Makassar Islamic University Academic Office and identify the most important variables affecting the performance of university academic staff. The research method use Analysis method. Data were collected using a list of questions or questionnaires filled out by respondents and then analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis. The results show that labor discipline (Discipline variable1), work environment variable X2 )and job satisfaction variable X3) also significantly demonstrate the performance of employees at the Islamic University Academic Makassar. The variable that has a significant impact on employee performance is the work discipline variable.
Article Details
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate the changes made. This should be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your usage.
- ShareAlike — When you remix, transform, or build upon the material, the contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Basalamah, J. (2018). Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Journal of Economic, Management and Accounting, 1(1), 54–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.35914/jemma.v1i1.81
Boyne, G. A. 2010. Performance management: Does it work? In Public management and performance: Research directions, eds.
Richard M. Walker, George A. Boyne, and Gene A. Brewer. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Boyne, G. A., & Chen, A. (2007). Performance targets and public service improvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3): 455–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul007
Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, J. D. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 23(4): 269–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.08.002
Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types on organizational performance: A longitudinal study of public services. Journal of Management Studies 46(4): 650–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x
Nitisemito. (2006). Manajemen Personalia, edisi kedua. Ghalia: Jakarta.
Sariyathi, N. K. (2007). Prestasi kerja karyawan (suatu kajian teori). Buletin Studi 2007, Undefined.
Sugiyono. (2013). Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Alfabeta: Bandung.
Walker, R. M., & Damanpour, F. (2008). Innovation type and organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In Managing improvement in public service delivery: Progress and prospects, eds. C. Donaldson, J. Hartley, C. Skelcher, and M. Wallace. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
Walker, R., Damanpour, F., Devece, C. A. (2010). Management Innovation and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Effect of Performance Management, JPART 21(2): 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq043