Product Innovation Strategy and Dynamic Environment Against the Improvement of Company Performance at MSME in Kulon Progo

Wulan Dari, Dessy Isfianadewi

Abstract


This study aims to improve company performance at MSME by implementing product innovation strategies supported by dynamic environments. This research used a quantitative approach and the structural equation model (SEM) method. Data collection employed questionnaire methods, and data analysis was tested using AMOS. This study’s population was MSMEs registered at the Cooperatives and MSME Office in Kulon Progo Regency in 2019. Besides, the respondents sampled in this study were 200 MSMEs focusing on the culinary, handicraft, and fashion industry sectors. This study’s results proved that the dynamic environment positively and significantly influenced product innovation strategies. Then, product innovation positively and significantly affected firm performance. Furthermore, the dynamic environment had a positive and significant influence on firm performance. The product innovation strategy mediated the relationship between the dynamic environment and firm performance. This study contributes to the MSMEs’ owners being aware of the importance of improving company performance by continuously implementing product innovation strategies because consumers are smarter to choose and decide where and what products to consume as their needs and desires’ fulfillment. This product innovation strategy could mediate the influence of the dynamic environment and company performance.


Keywords


Product innovation; Dynamic environment; Company performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul. (2019). Kemenkop Perkuat Kemitraan Koperasi dan Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah Kulon Progo Dengan Usaha Besar. Retrieved November 13, 2019, from https://www.indotimes.co.id/14562/2019/03/24/kemenkop-perkuat-kemitraan-kumkm-kulon-progo-dengan-usaha-besar/

Acosta, P. ., Popa, S., & Conesa, I. M. (2018). Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 824–849. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0448

Alexiev, A. S., Volberda, H. W., & Bosch, F. A. J. (2016). Interorganizational collaboration and firm innovativeness: Unpacking the role of the organizational environment. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 974–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.002

Arshad, M. Z., & Arshad, D. (2019). Internal capabilities and SMEs performance: A case of textile industry in Pakistan. Management Science Letters, 9(4), 621–628. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.1.001

BAPPEDA DIY. (2019). Data Jumlah UMKM di Wilayah DIY. Retrieved February 25, 2020, from http://bappeda.jogjaprov.go.id/dataku/data_dasar/index/107-ukm

Boyne, G. A., & Meier, K. J. (2009). Environmental turbulence, organizational stability, and public service performance. Administration and Society, 40(8), 799–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399708326333

Budiarto, D. S., Prabowo, M. A., & Herawan, T. (2017). An integrated information system to support supply chain management & Performance in SMEs. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 10(2), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.2180

Carranza, J. E. (2010). Product innovation and adoption in market equilibrium: The case of digital cameras. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(6), 604–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.02.003

Chang, Y. ., Hughes, M., & Hotho, S. (2011). Internal and external innovation ambidexterity antecedents of SMEs’ outcomes. Management Decision, 49(10), 1658–1676. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111183816

Corsino, M., & Gabriele, R. (2010). Product innovation and firm growth: Evidence from the integrated circuit industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq050

Dibrell, C., Davis, P. S., & Craig, J. (2008). Fueling Innovation through Information Technology in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2008.00240.x

Dinas Koperasi dan UMKM. (2019). Data UMKM Berdasarkan Sektor Ekonomi Kab/Kota Kulon Progo.

Fontana, R., & Nesta, L. (2009). Product innovation and survival in a high-tech industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 34(4), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-009-9210-7

Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Han, C., & Gao, S. (2019). A Chain Multiple Mediation Model Linking Strategic, Management, and Technological Innovations to Firm Competitiveness, 21(5), 879-905. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v21i5.4030

Heimonen, T. (2012). What are the factors that affect innovation in growing SMEs? European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(1), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061211192861

Jansen, J. J. P., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2009). Strategic leadership for exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.008

Kementerian Koperasi. (2019). Rencana strategis sekretariat kementerian koperasi dan usaha kecil dan menengah republik indonesia tahun 2015 - 2019.

Klein, & Sorra. (1996). Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, & Managing Brand Equity. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Kusiak, A. (2009). Innovation: A data-driven approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.025

Lee, S. M., Kim, J., Choi, Y., & Lee, S. (2009). Effects of IT knowledge and media selection on operational performance of small firms. Small Business Economics, 32(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9095-5

Lukas, & Ferrell, O. . (2000). The Effect of Market Orientation on Product Innovation. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 28(2), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Moeheriono. (2012). Competency Based Performance Measurement. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Muchlas, Z. (2015). Strategi Inovasi Dan Daya Saing Industri Kecil Menengah (IKM) Agro Industri Di Kota Batu. Jurnal JIBEKA, 9(2), 78–91. Retrieved from http://galeriukm.web.id/news/kriteria-usaha-mikro-

Munizu, M. (2010). Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor Eksternal dan Internal Terhadap Kinerja Usaha Mikro dan Kecil (UMK) di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 12(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.9744/jmk.12.1.pp.33-41

Omri, W. (2015). Innovative behavior and venture performance of SMEs: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. European Journal of Innovation Management, 18(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2013-0015

Pesalj, Pavlov, & Micheli, P. (2018). The use of management control and performance measurement systems in SMEs: A levers of control perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(11), 2169–2191. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2016-0565

Popa, S., Acosta, P. ., & Conesa, I. (2017). Antecedents, moderators, and outcomes of innovation climate and open innovation: An empirical study in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118(March), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.014

Prajogo, D. I. (2016). The strategic fit between innovation strategies and business environment in delivering business performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.037

Raju, P. S., Lonial, S. C., & Crum, M. D. (2011). Market orientation in the context of SMEs: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1320–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.002

Rehman, M. ., Wong, H. Y., Sultan, P., & Merrilees, B. (2018). How brand-oriented strategy affects the financial performance of B2B SMEs. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 33(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2016-0237

Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002

Sanchez, E. ., Morales, V. J., & Rojas, R. (2017). Analysis of the influence of the environment, stakeholder integration capability, absorptive capacity, and technological skills on organizational performance through corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 345–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0436-9

Schweitzer, F. M., Gassmann, O., & Gaubinger, K. (2011). Open innovation and its effectiveness to embrace turbulent environments. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(6), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919611003702

Tambunan, T. T. H. (2011). Development of micro, small and medium enterprises and their constraints: A story from Indonesia. International Journal of Business, 13(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5492

Tsai, K. H., & Yang, S. Y. (2013). Firm innovativeness and business performance: The joint moderating effects of market turbulence and competition. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8), 1279–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.06.001

Tsai, K. H., & Yang, S. Y. (2014). The contingent value of firm innovativeness for business performance under environmental turbulence. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(2), 343–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0225-4

UU RI No. 20. (2008). Kriteria UMKM.

Valencia, J. C. N., Valle, R. S., & Jimenez, D. J. (2010). Organizational culture as determinant of product innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 466-491. https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2011.05627dad.006

Wheelen, & Hunger, D. J. (2012). Strategic Management and Business Policy Concepts and Cases (Eleventh E). USA: Prentice-Hall International.

Wong, S. K. S. (2014). Impacts of environmental turbulence on entrepreneurial orientation and new product success. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2013-0032

Wu, L. Y. (2010). Applicability of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views under environmental volatility. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.007

Zaefarian, G., Forkmann, S., Mitręga, M., & Henneberg, S. C. (2017). A Capability Perspective on Relationship Ending and Its Impact on Product Innovation Success and Firm Performance. Long Range Planning, 50(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.023

Zahra, S. A., & Das, S. R. (1993). Innovation Strategy and Financial Performance in Manufacturing Companies: an Empirical Study. Production and Operations Management, 2(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.1993.tb00036.x

Zehir, C., Altindag, E., & Acar, A. Z. (2011). The Effects of relationship orientation through innovation orientation on firm performance: An empirical study on Turkish family-owned firms. Procedia-Social and Behavior Sciences, 24. 896-908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.024




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/mb.11294

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Wulan Dari, Dessy Isfianadewi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Office: 

Ruang Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 
Gedung Ki Bagus Hadikusuma (E4) Lantai 2, Kampus Terpadu Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta,
Jalan Brawijaya (Lingkar Selatan), Tamantirto, Kasihan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55183
Website: journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/mb - E-mail: mabis@umy.ac.id
Phone: +62 274 387 656 (ext: 118)

Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)