English Education Master Students' Perceptions on Their Agency as Future EFL Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.v6i2.11994Keywords:
Agency, future EFL teachers, English Education Master students, narrative inquiryAbstract
This study investigated English Education Master Students’ perceptions of their agency as future EFL teachers. The underlying concern for conducting this study is a shortage of future EFL teachers’ professional development literature exploring the significance of promoting agency in varied second language classroom contexts. The narrative inquiry approach was employed to obtain more overarching depictions about the apparent stories told by the research participants to fulfil this central research objectivity. Ten open-ended written narrative inquiries were harnessed to shed more enlightenment for future EFL teachers’ professional development with the support of robust agency establishment. This set of narrative inquiry questions heed more profound attention to dig out graduate EFL students’ perceptions of their agency as prospective second language educators. The obtained findings overtly revealed that future EFL teachers could elevate their agency and promote holistic second language learning enterprises while their school institutions imparted continuous mutual supports. Eventually, the findings will shed more enlightenment for ELT experts, practitioners, and policymakers to design more unrestricted educational regulations. They supportively substantiate future EFL teachers' agency growth, particularly in Indonesia's EFL learning contexts, emphasizing the text-based learning achievements.References
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Calvert, L. (2016). The Power Of Teacher Agency - Learning Forward. Journal of Staff Development, 37(2), 51–56. https://learningforward.org/journal/april-2016-issue/the-power-of-teacher-agency/
Deveci, I., & Onder, I. (2013). The Students’ Views Related to the Given Homeworks in the Science and Technology Courses: A Qualitative Study. Online Submission, 3(1), 1–9.
Eteläpelto, A. (2017). Emerging conceptualisations on professional agency and learning. In Agency at Work (pp. 183-201). Springer, Cham.
Fithriani, R. (2018). Discrimination Behind Nest and Nnest Dichotomy in ELT Professionalism. KnE Social Sciences, 3(4), 741. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1982
Gao, X. (2017). Language teacher autonomy and social censure. Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching: New Research Agendas, 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52998-5_3
Garcia-Carrion, R., Gomez, A., Molina, S., & Ionescu, V. (2017). Teacher education in schools as learning communities: Transforming high-Poverty Schools through dialogic learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n4.4
Green, C., & Pappa, S. (2021). EFL Teacher Education in Finland: Manifestations of Professional Agency in Teacher Educators’ Work. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(4), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1739128
Gurney, L., & Liyanage, I. (2016). EAL teacher agency: implications for participation in professional development. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 11(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/22040552.2016.1187650
Hamid, M. O., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2016). Globalization, english language policy, and teacher agency: Focus on Asia. International Education Journal, 15(1), 26–43. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1099019
Haneda, M., & Sherman, B. (2016). A Job-Crafting Perspective on Teacher Agentive Action. TESOL Quarterly, 50(3), 745–754. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.318
Hatmanto, E. D., & Purwanti, E. (2020). Strategies in Teaching and Engaging the Millennial Generation. Internasional Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 10(01), 81–88.
https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v10.3945
Kalaja, P. (2015). A review of five studies on learner beliefs about second language learning and teaching: exploring the possibilities of narratives. AFinLA Yearbook, 73, 21–38.
Kayi-Aydar, H. (2015). Teacher agency, positioning, and English language learners: Voices of pre-service classroom teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.009
Kitade, K. (2015). Second language teacher development through CALL practice: The emergence of teachers’ agency. CALICO Journal, 32(3), 396–425. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.26637
Kordabadi, F. S., Aidinlu, N. A., & Davatgari Asl, H. (2021). An Exploratory Study of Iranian EFL Teachers’ Agency: Conceptions and Practices. Internasional Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 9(35). http://jfl.iaun.ac.ir/article_679362.html
Le, M. D., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Burns, A. (2021). English primary teacher agency in implementing teaching methods in response to language policy reform: a Vietnamese case study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1–2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741209
Liyanage, I., Bartlett, B., Walker, T., & Guo, X. (2015). Assessment policies, curricular directives, and teacher agency: quandaries of EFL teachers in Inner Mongolia. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2014.915846
Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally Developing as a Teacher Educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533386
Morales Jaramillo, M. A. (2021). Agency and its connection to a sociocultural perspective on teachers’ professional development: The lived experiences of five EFL teachers (Doctoral dissertation). Kansas State University
Murtiningsih, S. (2019). (Mis)matched Perceptions of EFL Teachers and Students regarding Effective Teachers. 353(IcoSIHESS), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.2991/icosihess-19.2019.16
Nguyen, H. T. M., & Bui, T. (2016). Teachers’ agency and the enactment of educational reform in Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 17(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2016.1125664
Pappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Eteläpelto, A. (2019). Teacher agency within the Finnish CLIL context: tensions and resources. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 593–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1286292
Pertiwi, R. S., Salabiyati, I., Damara, D., & Pratolo, B. W. (2020). The Teacher’s Perspectives About Challenges of Teaching English for Young Learners: A Case Study at English Course for Young Learners. 397(Icliqe 2019), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200129.009
Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A., & Miller, K. (2012). Teacher Agency in Curriculum Making: Agents of Change and Spaces for Manoeuvre. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x
Rogers, R., & Wetzel, M. M. (2013). Studying Agency in Literacy Teacher Education: A Layered Approach to Positive Discourse Analysis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 10(1), 62–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2013.753845
Sahragard, R., & Rasti, A. (2017). Making sense of EFL teacher agency : Insights from an Iran case study. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 9(19), 145–169.
Talmy, S., & Richards, K. (2011). Theorizing qualitative research interviews in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 32(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq045
Toom, A., Husu, J., & Patrikainen, S. (2015). Student teachers’ patterns of reflection in the context of teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.943731
Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., & Rust, F. O. (2015). Teachers professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 615–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044334
Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47(April), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.006
Vanassche, E., Kidd, W., & Murray, J. (2019). Articulating, reclaiming and celebrating the professionalism of teacher educators in England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1628211
Wahyuni Lestari, I. (2017). Demotivating Factors among Indonesian EFL Teachers. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.2115
Xiaolei, R. (2018). Engagement and negotiation: Exploring a tertiary female EFL teacher’s professional agency in her career development in P.R. China. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 4(3), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v4i3.678
Yang, H., & Clarke, M. (2018). Spaces of agency within contextual constraints: a case study of teacher’s response to EFL reform in a Chinese university. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1460252
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, social media account, or on their website) after the article getting published in the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.