Metadiscourse Markers: Frequency and Errors Made by EFL Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.v7i2.14403Keywords:
metadiscourse markers, interactive markers, interactional markersAbstract
To present a skillfully written abstract, an author should apply some strategies. One of them is the application of Metadiscourse Markers, which provides readers with linguistic features that will help them quickly get the gist of the entire research. Studies have examined the metadiscourse markers in abstracts of theses and published article journals written by Indonesian, but only a few used a corpus-based approach and analyzed the errors simultaneously. This study, therefore, aimed at finding the frequency of Metadiscourse Markers and grammatical errors made by Accounting Department students of Kupang State Polytechnic in their final papers’ abstracts. A corpus-based approach was applied by using AntConc Version 3.5.9 concordance tool. The study showed that interactive markers occurred more frequently than interactional resources. Moreover, grammatical errors were related to applying punctuation (comma), plural forms, verb tenses, and modality. This study suggests the teaching material includes the features of Metadiscourse Markers in abstract writing and further emphasizes the grammar on topics where students performed errors.References
Al-Shujairi, Y. B. J., Ya’u, M. S., & Buba, J. A. (2016). Role of moves, tenses, and metadiscourse in the abstract of an acceptable research article. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2016.v7n2s1p379
Alqahtani, S. N., & Abdelhalim, S. M. (2020). Gender-based study of interactive metadiscourse markers in efl academic writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(10), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1010.20
Anthony, L. (2020). AntConc (Version 3.5.9). Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Ashofteh, Z., Shirvan, M. E., & Golparvar, S. E. (2020). The move structure of abstracts in applied linguistics research articles in light of the distribution and functions of metadiscourse markers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 2077–2096. https://doi.org/10.17263/JLLS.851035
Bal-Gezegin, B. (2016). A corpus-based investigation of metadiscourse in academic book reviews. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 713–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.097
Bouchemet, T. (2019). Interactional metadiscourse in applied linguistics master theses: A corpus-based comparative study. مجلة العلوم الإنسانية, 57. https://doi.org/10.34174/0079-000-051-027
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. Peter Lang.
Doró, K. (2015). The rhetoric structure of research article abstracts in English studies journals. Prague Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2014-0013
Fitria, T. N. (2020). Error analysis of English abstract in International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR). Al-Lisan, 5(2), 164–181. https://doi.org/10.30603/al.v6i2.1335
Gholami, J., Nejad, S. R., & Pour, J. L. (2014). Metadiscourse markers misuses; A study of EFL learners’ argumentative essays. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 580–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.454
Hamid, S. F. (2019). Interactive Metadiscourse in Finding and Discussion Section of Theses at English Department Universitas Negeri Jakarta. 254(Conaplin 2018), 564–567. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.320
Huckin, T. (2001). Abstracting from abstracts. In M. Hewings (Ed.), Academic Writing in Context (pp. 93–103). University of Birmingham Press.
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Hussein, K. A. A., Khalil, J. A., & Abbas, N. F. (2018). Metadiscourse markers in master thesis abstracts of American and Iraqi English Theses. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.26
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. Continuum.
Jin, X., & Shang, Y. (2016). Analyzing metadiscourse in the english abstracts of ba theses. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0701.24
Jobling, M. (2014). [Review of the book Writing scientific research articles: Strategy and steps (2nd edition by M. Cargill and P. O’Connor:). Aquaculture International, 22(2), 963–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-013-9689-7
Kaies, S. (2019). A corpus-based comparative study of the use of interactional metadiscourse markers in master theses general conclusions: The case of postgraduates of oum el bouaghi and iowa universities (University of Larbi Ben M’Hidi OEB).
Karami, Y., & Poor, M. L. (2020). a comparative corpus-based analysis of using hedging, boostering, and self-mentioning metadiscourse markers in persian and English psychology books. International Journal of Research in English Education, 5(2), 13-28.
Kawase, T. (2015). Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.006
Kopple, W. J. V. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82–93.
Liu, P., & Huang, X. (2017). A study of interactional metadiscourse in English abstracts of Chinese economics research articles. Higher Education Studies, 7(3), 25. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n3p25
Madkur, A. (2013). Grammatical analysis on the abstract of scientific writing. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 1(1), 52–67.
Mansouri, S., Najafabadi, M. M., & Boroujeni, S. S. (2016). Metadiscourse in research article abstracts: A cross-lingual and disciplinary investigation. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(4), 296–307. www.jallr.com
Maria, A. D. (2020). Grammatical errors analysis in writing english abstract of final report at Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Programme Study Of Politeknik Sekayu. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 2(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v3i2.4447
Mazidah, E. N. (2019). A comparison of the interactive metadiscourse in the abstracts of articles written by Indonesian and NES Scholars. Etnolingual, 3(1), 57–74.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics. In Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data (Vol. 53, Issue 9).
Mocanu, M. (2015). An empirical analysis of metadiscourse in the abstracts of Romanian accounting research articles. Contabilitate Şi Informatică de Gestiune, 14(2), 362–377.
Ngula, R. (2018). Corpus method in language studies. In Perspectives on Conducting and Reporting research in the Humanities (pp. 205–223). University of Cape Coast Press.
Noori, A. (2020). An Investigation of Afghan undergraduate English major students’ academic writing difficulties. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.5249
Novawan, A., Aisyiyah, S., Miqawati, A. H., Wijayanti, F., & Indrastana, N. S. (2020). Exploring the teachers' perspective on morality in an English as a foreign language pedagogy. JER| Journal of ELT Research. 5(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.22236/JER
Nugroho, A. (2019). Exploring metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Journal of English Language and Culture, 9(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v9i2.1689
Nugroho, A. (2020). Investigating the use of metadiscourse markers by American and Indonesian writers in opinion and business articles. Journal of English Language and Culture, 10(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.30813/jelc.v10i2.2138
Pandey, G. P. (2020). Metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts : A case of M . Ed. English. Nepal Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (NJMR), 3(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3126/njmr.v3i2.33019
Rodina, H. (2007). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing by HYLAND, KEN. In The Modern Language Journal (Vol. 91, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00593_9.x
Sharif, F. D., & Hassani, M. (2016). Error analysis of the grammatical patterns in the English translation of the abstracts of the persian articles in the iranian published academic journals. ELT Voices- International Journal for Teachers of English 7(1), 1–10.
Suntara, W., & Chokthawikit, S. (2018). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts: An analysis from public health journals. Language and Linguistics, 36, 31–52. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/joling/article/view/154294
Viera, R. T. (2019). Analysis of abstracts in scientific papers written in English using corpora. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 4(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v4i2.323
Williams, J. (1981). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Scott Foresman.
Yaghi, E., & Abdullah, A. (2015). Review of Learners' Errors: an Error Analysis Perspective. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312595230
Yanto, & Sulistiyo, U. (2017). Students ’ difficulties in writing their thesis in English at English education study program Jambi University. International Seminar and Annual Meeting BKS-PTN Wilayah Barat, 763–765.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, social media account, or on their website) after the article getting published in the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
.png){kind=logo}
