Students’ Reaction and Preferences to Teachers’ Feedback on Weekly Journal Activity at English Education Department of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.3229Keywords:
weekly journal activity, feedback, students’ reaction, preferred feedbackAbstract
The objective of this research was to reveal students’ reaction and preferences to teachers’ feedback on weekly journal activity. This study was qualitative research that the data were compiled from six students batch of 2015 at English Education Department of Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta through in-depth interviews. The results showed that, with regard to the reactions of the students were satisfied with teachers’ feedback, showed enjoyment in learning, felt curious in learning, and got demotivated in learning.
The result also showed that the students preferred written feedback to oral feedback as they were easier to identify their errors, and oral feedback became second choice to comment their work. The students also believed that language and behavior of the teachers became the strongest effect creating the reaction of the students. On giving feedback, the teacher sometimes delivered it by using casual language that made the students easy to understand the feedback. Apparently, the language used by the teacher on delivering the feedback sometimes the teacher used funny words, so it could make the students enthusiasm to learn.
References
Alamis, M. P. (2010). Evaluating students' reactions and responses to teachers' written feedbacks. Philippine ESL Journal, 5, 40-57.
CChandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writting, 12, 267-296.
Eidswick, J. (2009). The influence of interest on reading comprehension in EFL students. Annual Reseach Report of The Language Center, 12, 25-38.
Garrett, T. (2008). Student-centered and teacher-centered-classroom management: a case study of three elementary teachers. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 43(1), 34-47.
Ghani, M., & Asgher, T. (2012). Effects of teacher and peer feedback on students' writing at secondary level. Journal of Educational Reseach, 15(2), 1-13.
Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The Relation Between L2 Reading Comprehension and Schema Theory: A Matter of Text Familiarity. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(2), 1-8.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. Heldref Publication, 99(4), 232-246.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Reseach, 77(1), 81-112.
Hawe , E., Dixon, H., & Watson, E. (2009). Oral feedback in the context of written feedback. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 31(1), 43-58.
Icy, L. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 144-164.
Leibold, N., & Schwarz, L. M. (2015). The art of giving online feedback. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 34-46.
LLipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2008). Response to assessment feedback: the effects of grades, praise, and source of information. ETS, 57(1), 1-65.
Mahdi, D., & Saadany, N. E. (2013). Oral feedback in the EFL classroom. Malmo Hohskoala, 63, 11-27.
Mendez, E. H., & Cruz, M. D. (2012). Teachers' perceptions about oral corrective feedback and their practice in EFL classroom. Bogota, 14(2), 63-75.
Patton, M. Q., & Cochran, M. (2012). A guide to using qualitative research methodology. Medicins Ssns Frontieres, 7(3), 1-36.
Saito Kazuya, & Lyster, R. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 265-302.
Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: a case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46-69.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
Toro, M. F., & Hurd, S. (2014). A model of factors affecting independent learners’ engagement with feedback on language learning tasks. Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia, 35(1), 106-125.
Tuan, L. T. (2010). Enhancing EFL learners' writing skill via journal writing. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 3(3), 81-88.
Xuelian, L., & Jeong-Won, L. (2014). EFL college students’ reactions to their writing teachers’ corrective feedback. English Teaching, 69(3), 81-103.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, social media account, or on their website) after the article getting published in the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
.png){kind=logo}
