Communicative Language Teaching in the Moroccan Classroom: Perception, Practices, and Difficulties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.5251Keywords:
communicative language teaching, reform, curriculum, practices, factorsAbstract
Research on the teaching practices of EFL teachers has revealed that teachers' beliefs are often at odds with their actual classroom practices. Accordingly, the present investigation compared teachers' perceptions and classroom practices of the Communicative Language Teaching principles (CLT) in the provincial directorate of Jerada. This exploration is an attempt to examine teachers' practices, thereby draw a line between what they think they do and what they do in the classroom. To this end, ten teachers were interviewed. Out of this number, only two teachers were observed. The data gathered via semi-structured interviews have shown that the teacher respondents were well-informed about the principles of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). However, the data collected by the classroom observations revealed that the teachers were not teaching English communicatively. Factors such as learner's language proficiency, lack of knowledge as to how to implement the approach, unsuitable textbooks, and lack of motivation on the part of the learner, contributed enormously to the non-use of the CLT. To overcome these obstacles, the findings of the current study suggest that EFL teachers "should" motivate students, use simple fluency-oriented tasks, simplify, model, and scaffold the learning activities. They also recommend to adapt the textbooks to students' needs, research their practice, and invest more in their professional development. The Ministry of National Education is required to provide high-quality training to help teachers cope with the demands of the Communicative Approach.
References
Adnan, A. H. M & Hazlina, A. (2012). Communicative Language Teaching: Misconstructions and Misunderstandings in the Malaysian Context. English Language Journal, (5), 97, 93.
Ait Hattani, H. (2018). Communicative language teaching in the Moroccan EFL classroom. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, (32), 87-98.
Bedmarm, L.V. (2014). Educational Reforms in Morocco: Evolution and Current Status. International Education Studies, (7), 95-105.
El Karfa, A. (2019). The Communicative Orientation of English Language Teaching Classrooms in Moroccan Secondary Schools. English Language Teaching, (12), 97-112.
Farerell & Lim .(2005). Conceptions of grammar teaching: A case study of teachers' beliefs and classroom practices. Teaching English as a Foreign Language, (9), 1-13.
Fröhlich, M., Spada, N., & Allen, P. (1985). Differences in the communicative orientation of L2 classrooms. In TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 27-57.
Jabeen, S. S. (2014). Implementation of communicative approach. English Language Teaching, (7), 68-74.
Huang, S. (2016). Communicative language teaching: practical difficulties in the rural EFL classrooms in Taiwan. The Journal of Education and Practice, (24), 186-202.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings, Edit, by J.B Pride &J.Holmes. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books.
Ibrahim, N. M., & Takal, M. G (2019). Perceptions and challenges of CLT in the EFL classes- Possible research in Afghan Tertiary EFL context. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, (8), 1159-1164.
Kachru, B. B. (1992). The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Kaymakamoglu, S. E. (2018). Teachers' beliefs, perceived practice, and actual classroom practice in relation to traditional (teacher-centered) and constructivist (learner-centered) teaching (Note1). Journal of Education and Learning, (7), 29-36.
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mutlu, G., & Kashoglu, O. (2015). Examining the role of context in the implementation of CLT in Turkey. International Association of Research in Foreign Language Education and Applied Linguistics., (41), 43-55.
Rao, Z. (2002). Chinese students' perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in EFL classroom. System, (30), 85-105.
Rahman, M. M., Singh, M.K.M., & Pandian, A. (2018). Exploring ESL teacher Beliefs and classroom practices: A case study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 295-310.
Razmjoo, S. A. (2006). Is communicative language teaching practical in the expanding circle? A case study of teachers of Shiraz high schools and institutes. Journal of Language and Learning, (2) 144-171.
Swain, M. (2000). The Output Hypothesis and beyond: Mediating Acquisition through Collaborative Dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Ministry of National Education, the National Charter for Education and Training (1999). Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/11QKJW7txwFnplZTpRnN8H6MKky0QALr7/view.
The Ministry of National Education, the White Book. (2002). Retrieved from http://www.mediafire.com/file/xjqq4r1tw63wrwu/%25D8%25A7%25D9%2584%25D9%2583%25D8%25AA%25D8%25A7%25D8%25A8_%25D8%25A7%25D9%2584%25D8%25A3%25D8%25A8%25D9%258A%25D8%25B6.rar/file.
The Ministry of National Education, English Language Guidelines for Secondary Schools: Common Core, First Year, and Second Year Baccalaureate. (2007). Retrieved from https://ahwaltaalim.blogspot.com/p/redirect_21.html.
Tootkaboni, A. A. (2019). Teachers' beliefs and practices towards communicative language teaching in the expanding circle. Revista Signos. Estudios de Linguistica. (5), 265-289.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, social media account, or on their website) after the article getting published in the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.