Creative Teaching in EFL Classrooms: Voices from Afghanistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.5252Keywords:
academic achievements, creative teaching, fostering creativity, student-centered approachAbstract
This qualitative research aims to explore the reported experiences of five Afghan EFL instructors at the English Department, Herat University, concerning the creative teaching of English. It specifically investigated the challenges and the opportunities regarding the creative teaching of English that these teachers have encountered in their courses. The researchers employed constructivist perspectives of learning in which learners make meaning out of their previous experiences and knowledge (Hill, 2014) as the theoretical framework to analyze and interpret the data. The data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed by using thematic analysis. The findings indicated that creative teaching made the learning process fun. It also revealed that creative teaching increased students’ participation and motivation because it put students in the center of the learning process. The findings also demonstrated that some students showed resistance toward change—moving from a teacher-centered approach to a student-centered approach—when creative teaching was implemented. It also showed that some instructors needed the support of higher education administrators to incorporate creative teaching into their courses as there was a conspicuous lack of professional development needs in this regard. The study argued that the creative teaching of English positively impacted students’ academic achievements. This study could serve as a significant way to introduce information and strategies on creative teaching to L2 instructors in similar contexts as Afghanistan. The results provided implications for creative teaching in EFL classrooms as well as for the future of teaching English in ESL and EFL contexts.
References
Babury, M. O., & Hayward, F. M. (2014). Afghanistan higher education: The struggle for quality, merit, and transformation. Planning for Higher Education, 42(2), 1. Retrieved from https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-381056249/afghanistan-higher-education-the-struggle-for-quality
Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. Sage.
Brewer, G. (2015). Introduction: Creativity and education. In Gayle Brewer & Russel Hogarth (Eds.), Creative education, teaching, and learning (pp. 1-8). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Christie, C. (2016). Speaking spontaneously in the modern foreign languages’ classroom: Tools for supporting successful target language conversation. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 74-89.https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.836751
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2013). Creativity: The psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
Doron, E. (2016). Short term intervention model for enhancing divergent thinking among school-aged children. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 372-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1195616
Ferrari, A., Cachia, R., & Punie, Y. (2009). Innovation and creativity in education and training in the EU member state: Fostering creative learning and supporting innovative teaching. JRC Technical Note, 52374, 64.https://doi.org/10.2791/52913
Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. NYU Press.
Guzdial, M., Liao, N., & Riedl, M. (2018). Co-creative level design via machine learning. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.09212.pdf
Hagtvedt, L. P., Dossinger, K., Harrison, S. H., & Huang, L. (2019). Curiosity made the cat more creative: Specific curiosity as a driver of creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.007
Hill, L. H. (2014). Graduate students’ perspectives on effective teaching. Adult learning, 25(2), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1045159514522433
Hong, E., Part, R., & Rowell, L. (2017). Children’s and teachers’ conceptions of creativity: Contradictions and implications in classroom instruction. In Creative Contradictions in Education (pp. 303-331). Springer: Cham.
Miri, M. A. (2016). Integrating writing activities in the English department literature courses at an Afghan University (master’s thesis). The Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
Miri, M. A. (2019). The impact of the English language in Afghanistan: An autoethnography. International Journal of TESOL and Learning, 8(1), 1–14. Retrieved from http://untestedideas.net/journal_article.php?jid=ijt201903&vol=8&issue=1
Miri, M. A., & Joia, J. (2018). Writing anxiety in an Afghan EFL setting: Voices from five Afghan students. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1)14-29. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.3125
Newton, L., & Beverton, S. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions of creativity in elementary school English. Thinking skills and creativity, 7(3), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.02.002
Piasecka, L. (2018). Tinker, tailor: Creativity in foreign language learning and teaching. In Challenges of second and foreign language education in a globalized world (pp. 89-106). Springer: Cham.
Root-Bernstein, Robert, Root-Bernstein, & Michele. (2017). People, passions, problems: The role of creative exemplars in teaching for creativity. In Ronald A. Beghetto & Bharath Sriraman (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education (pp. 143-164). New York, NY: Springer.
Rus, D. (2020). Creative Methodologies in Teaching English for Engineering Students. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 337-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.049
Sale, D. (2015). Creative teaching: An evidence-based approach. New York, NY: Springer.
Sarwari, K. (2018). Effective teaching of English in large multilevel under-resourced classes at an Afghan public university. (Thesis, Indiana University of Pennsylvania).
Soh, K. (2017). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 58-66.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002
Tanggaard, L., & Hjorth, R. (2017). Promoting abduction–A teaching experiment on creative learning processes in a high school classroom context. In Ronald A. Beghetto & Bharath Sriraman (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education (pp. 221-242). Springer.
Wang, L., & Kokotsaki, D. (2018). Primary school teachers’ conceptions of creativity in teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) in China. Thinking skills and creativity, 29, 115-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.06.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories, social media account, or on their website) after the article getting published in the journal, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.