Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif Dan Prosedural Kompensasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Dan Kinerja Paramedis Di Rumah Sakit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jbti.v7i1.2544Keywords:
Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, Job Satisfaction, Employees performance.Abstract
This study discusses the organizational justice include distributive justice compensation and procedural justice compensation to employees performance both directly and indirectly influenced by job satisfaction.
The populations in this study were all para-medic employees in RSJ Prof. Dr. Soerojo Magelang totaling 142 people. Data were collected by survey method is to provide a list of questions or questionnaires directly to the respondent. Data analysis techniques in this study using analysis of SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) program operated by AMOS 21.
The results showed that distributive justice compensation significant positive effect on job satisfaction; procedural justice compensation significant positive effect on job satisfaction; distributive justice compensation are not significantly to employees performance; procedural justice compensation are not significantly to employees performance; job satisfaction significant positive effect on employees performance; job satisfactions as a mediating influence of distributive justice compensation and procedural justice compensation to employees performance.
References
Clayton, S. & Opotow, S. (2003). Justice and identity: changing perspectives on what is fair. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4): 298-310.
Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C. & Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3); 425-445.
Colquitt, J.A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 386-400.
Folger, R. & Konovsky, M.A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1): 115-130.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Jogiyanto, H.M. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis: Salah Kaprah dan Pengalaman-Pengalaman. Yogyakarta: BPFE Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Kinicki, A. & Fulgate, M. (2013). Organizational Behavior. 5th Edition. McGraw Hill Education.
Lind, E.A. & Tyler, T.R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Planum.
Masterson, S.S., Lewis, K.,Goldman, B.M. and Taylor, M.S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: the differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4); 738-748.
McFarlin, D.B. & Sweeney, P.D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3): 626-637.
Palupi, M. (2013). Pengaruh keadilan kompensasi, kebijakan rotasi, karyawan dan komitmen afektif pada perilaku retaliasi PNS dikantor X di Yogyakarta.”Jurnal riset manajemen dan bisnis. Volume 8 No.1.
Palupi, M., Tjahjono, H.K. & Nuri, R. (2014). Pengaruh keadilan distributif karir dan keadilan prosedural karir terhadap perilaku retaliasi karyawan swasta di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY) dengan kepuasan karir sebagai variabel pemediasian. Jurnal Universitas Paramadina, 11(2): 1095-1109.
Roberts, G.E. & Reed, T. (1996). Performance appraisal participation, goal setting and feedback. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Fall: 29-60.
Skarlicky, D.P. & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the work place: the role of distributive, procedural and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3): 434-443.
Sweeney, P.D. & McFarlin, D.B. (1993). Workers’ evaluation of the “Ends” and the “Means”: an examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (55):23-40.
Tang, T.L. & Baldwin, L.J. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment. Sam Advanced Management journal, 25-31.
Taylor, M.S., Tracy, K.B., Renard, M.K., Harrison, J.K. & Carroll, S.J. (1995) Due process in performance appraisal: a quasi-experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly. 40: 495-523.
Thibaut, J. & Walker, L. (1978). A theory of procedure. California Law Review, 66: 541-566.
Tjahjono, H.K. (2005). Praktik-praktik manajemen SDM strategik; pengujian universalistik dan kontijensi dalam menjelaskan kinerja organisasional. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi Kinerja, 9(2):123-134.
Tjahjono, H.K. (2007). Validasi item-item keadilan distributif dan keadilan prosedural: aplikasi structural equation modeling dengan cofirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Manajemen STIE YKPN, 18(2): 115-123.
Tjahjono, H.K. (2008a). Pengaruh keadilan organisasional terhadap perilaku retaliasi (balas dendam) ditempat kerja. Buletin Ekonomi, 6(1): 12-19.
Tjahjono, H.K, (2008b). Studi Literatur Pengaruh Keadilan Distributif dan Keadilan Prosedural pada Konsekuensinya dengan Teknik Meta Analisis. Jurnal Psikologi Volume 35(1),21-40, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta.
Tjahjono, H.K. (2010). The extension of two-factor model of justice: hierarchical regression test and sample split. China-USA Business Review, 9(7): 39-54.
Tjahjono, H.K. (2011). The configuration pattern distributive and procedural justice and its consequences to satisfaction. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 22(1): 87-103.
Tjahjono, H.K. (2014). The fairness of organization’s performance appraisal, social capital and the impact toward affective commitment. International Journal of Administrative Science & Organization, 21(3): 173-179.
Tjahjono, H.K & Riniarti. 2015. Evaluasi keadilan praktik tunjangan kinerja pada kepuasan dan kinerja karyawan di kantor BPS DIY. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 19(2): 124-131.
Tyler, T.R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67(5):850-863.
Tyler, T.R. & Blader, S.L. (2003). The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4):349-361.
Viswesvaran, C. & Ones, D.S. (2002). Examining the construct of organizational justice: A Meta-Analytic evaluation of relations with work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 38: 193-203.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori dan Implementasi is licensed under 
Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
